Changing governments through elections is a rare and a recent practice. Yielding office the first time is foreboding because it entails the risk that the gesture would not be reciprocated, but the habit develops rapidly once the first step is taken. This article provides evidence for these assertions by examining about 3,000 elections in the world since 1788.
BenhabibJ.PrzeworskiA. (2006). The political economy of redistribution under democracy. Economic Theory, 29, 271-290.
5.
BoixC.StokesS. C. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55, 517-549.
6.
BushnellD. (1993). The making of modern Colombia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
CarterD. B.SignorinoC. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18, 271-292.
8.
CercasJ. (2011). The anatomy of a moment. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
9.
CollierS.SaterW. F. (1996). A history of Chile, 1808-1994. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CoxG. W. (2008). Authoritarian elections and leadership succession, 1975–2000. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego.
11.
DunnS. (2004). Jefferson’s second revolution: The election crisis of 1800 and the triumph of republicanism. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
12.
Escribà FolchA. (2014). Accountable for what? Regime types, performance, and the fate of outgoing dictators, 1946–2004. Democratization, 20, 160-185.
13.
FearonJ. (2011). Self-enforcing democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1661-1708.
14.
GeddesB. (2005, September). Why parties and elections in authoritarian regimes?Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
15.
GeddesB. (2009, September). How autocrats defend themselves against armed rivals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
16.
GeddesB.WrightJ.FrantzE. (2013). Autocratic regimes code book. Available from dictators.la.psu.edu
17.
GeddesB.WrightJ.FrantzE. (2014). New data set: Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 305-309.
18.
GettyJ. A. (1991). State and society under Stalin: Constitutions and elections in the 1930s. Slavic Review, 50, 18-35.
19.
GoemansH. E. (2008). Which way out? The manner and consequences of losing office. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 771-794.
20.
HydeS. D. (2011). The pseudo-democrat’s dilemma: Why election monitoring became an international norm?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
LehoucqF. (2002). Can parties police themselves? Electoral governance and democratization. International Political Science Review, 23, 29-46.
MakarenkoB. (in press). The role of elections in democracy. In PrzeworskiA. (Ed.), Democracy in a Russian mirror. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
MozaffarS.SchedlerA. (2002). The comparative study of electoral governance—Introduction. International Political Science Review, 23, 5-27.
25.
NalepaM. (2010). Skeletons in the closet: Transitional justice in post-communist Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Posada-CarbóE. (2000). Electoral juggling: A comparative history of the corruption of suffrage in Latin America, 1830-1930. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32, 611-644.
27.
Posada-CarbóE. (2008, September18-21). Historical sequences and the origins of democracy in Colombia, 1808–1886. Draft for presentation at the Conference “Origins of Democracy in the Americas, 1770s-1870s,” Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, IN.
28.
PrzeworskiA. (1991). Democracy and the market. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PrzeworskiA. (2005). Democracy as an equilibrium. Public Choice, 123, 253-273.
30.
PrzeworskiA.AlvarezM. R.CheibubJ. A.LimongiF. (2000). Democracy and development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
PrzeworskiA.AsadurianT.ThomasA. B. (2012). The origins of parliamentary responsibility. In GinsburgT. (Ed.), Comparative constitutional design (pp. 101-137). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PrzeworskiA.RiveroG.XiT. (2014). Elections as a method of processing conflicts (Working paper, June). Department of Politics, New York University, New York.
RouquieA. (1994). The military in Latin American politics since 1930. In BethellL. (Ed.). The Cambridge history of Latin America, Volume VI, Part 2: 1930 to the present (pp. 233-306). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SimpserA. (2013). More than winning: Why governments and parties manipulate elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SparksA. (1994). Tomorrow is another country. Johannesburg, South Africa: Struik.
38.
VanhanenT. (1997). Prospects of democracy: A study of 172 countries. London, England: Routledge.
39.
WeisbergerB. A. (2000). America afire: Jefferson, Adams, and the first contested election. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
40.
WrightJ.Escribà FolchA. (2012). Authoritarian institutions and regime survival: Transitions to democracy and subsequent autocracy. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 283-309.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
