At the psychological level, ethnic conflict can be seen as an extreme result of normal group identification processes. Bridging perceived intergroup boundaries is therefore key to improving intergroup relations. In contrast to the dominant association of nationalism with racism, chauvinism, xenophobia, and intolerance, we highlight the constructive potential of national identification. In a survey experiment, we find that the increased salience of a shared (Indian) national identity increases donations by members of a dominant ethnic group (Hindus) to members of a rival, minority group (Muslims). This effect is moderated by social status (caste). We suggest that national identification leads to a greater transformation in the behavior of low-status members of an ethnic group because they are more likely to be drawn to national identity as an enhancement of their social standing. Our study has implications for theories of social identity and interethnic cooperation, as well as for the literature on nationalism.
AbramsD.HoggM.MarquesJ. (2005). The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
2.
AlexanderM.ChristiaF. (2011). Context modularity of human altruism. Science, 334, 295-321.
3.
AllportG. (1927). Concepts of trait and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 284-293.
4.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
AndersonB. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.
6.
BantingK.KymlickaW. (2006). Immigration, multiculturalism, and the welfare state. Ethics & International Affairs, 20, 281-304.
7.
Bar-TalD. (1993). Patriotism as fundamental beliefs of group members. Politics and the Individual, 3, 45-62.
8.
Bar-TalD.StaubE. (1997). Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
9.
BarthF. (Ed.). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
10.
BassettR. L.BasingerD.LivermoreP. (1992). Lying in the laboratory: Deception in human research from psychological, philosophical, and theological perspectives. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 34, 201-212.
11.
BaylyS. (1999). Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age. In JohnsonG. (Ed.), The new Cambridge history of India (Vol. 4). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BerinskyA.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.
13.
BernhardH.FischbacherU.FehrE. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442, 912-915.
BortolottiL. (2006). Deception in psychology: Moral costs and benefits of unsought self-knowledge. Accountability in Research, 13, 259-275.
16.
BrassP. R. (2003). The production of Hindu-Muslim violence in contemporary India. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
17.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
18.
BrewerM. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict. In AshmoreR. D.JussimL. J.WilderD. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17-41). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
BrockT. C.BeckerA. L. (1966). “Debriefing” and susceptibility to subsequent experimental manipulations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 314-323.
20.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
21.
CapocciaG.SáezL.de RooijE. (2012). When state responses fail: Religion and secessionism in India 1952-2002. The Journal of Politics, 74, 1010-1022.
22.
CarpenteraJ.VerhoogenE.BurksS. (2005). The effect of stakes in distribution experiments. Economics Letters, 86, 393-398.
23.
ChaddaM. (1997). Ethnicity, security and separatism in India. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
24.
ChristensenL. (1988). Deception in psychological research: When is its use justified?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 664-675.
25.
CirakmanA. (2011). Flags and traitors: The advance of ethnonationalism in the Turkish self-image. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 1894-1912.
26.
CoendersM.ScheepersP. (2003). The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political Psychology, 24, 313-343.
27.
CookT. D.BeanJ. R.CalderB. J.FreyR.KrovetzM. L.ReismanS. R. (1970). Demand characteristics and three conceptions of the frequently deceived subject. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 185-194.
28.
DeshpandeA.SpearsD. (2012). Who is the identifiable victim? Caste interacts with sympathy in India (Working Papers, No. 211). New Delhi, India: Center for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
DeutschK. W. (1966). Nationalism and social communication: An inquiry into the foundations of nationality (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
DevosR.BanajiM. R. (2005). American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447-466.
32.
DiekmannA.PreisendoerferP. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441-472.
DunnJ. (1979). Western political theory in the face of the future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
EllemersN.DoosjeE. J.Van KnippenbergA.WilkeH. (1992). Status protection in high status minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123-140.
36.
FalkA.HeckmanJ. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326, 535-538.
37.
FearonJ. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 195-222.
38.
FehrE.FischbacherU. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 185-190.
39.
FernandesL. (2006). India’s new middle class: Democratic politics in an era of economic reform. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
FeshbachS. (1994). Nationalism, patriotism and aggression: A clarification of functional differences. In HuesmannL. (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Clinical perspectives (pp. 275-291). New York, NY: Putnam.
41.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.AnastasioP. A.BachmanB. A.RustM. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1-26.
42.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.BachmanB. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271-290.
43.
GibsonJ. L.GouwsA. (2002). Overcoming intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in democratic persuasion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
GijsbertsM. I. L.HagendoornA.ScheepersP. (2004). Nationalism and exclusion of migrants: Cross-national comparisons. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
45.
HassinR.FergusonM.ShidlovskiD.GrossT. (2007). Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political thought and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19757-19761.
46.
HoggM. A.HainsS. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309.
47.
HorowitzD. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
HuoY. J.SmithH. J.TylersT. R.LindA. E. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; Is assimilation the answer?Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
50.
JohnstonR.BantingK.KymlickaW.SorokaS. (2010). National identity and support for the welfare state. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43, 349-377.
51.
JuergensmeyerM. (1993). The new Cold War? Religious nationalism confronts the secular state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
KaufmannS. (1996). The Russian problem. Journal of Conflict Studies, 16(2), 7-25.
53.
KocherM. G.MartinssonP.VisserM. (2008). Does stake size matter for cooperation and punishment?Economics Letters, 99, 508-511.
54.
KramerR. M.BrewerM. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057.
55.
KreidieL. H.MonroeK. R. (2002). Psychological boundaries and ethnic conflict: How identity constrained choice and worked to turn ordinary people into perpetrators of ethnic violence during the Lebanese civil war. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 16, 5-36.
56.
LamontM.MolnárV. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167-195.
57.
LawsonC.LenzG. S.BakerA.MyersM. (2010). Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies. World Politics, 62, 561-593.
58.
LiQ.BrewerM. B. (2004). What does it mean to be an American? Patriotism, nationalism, and American identity after 9/11. Political Psychology, 25, 727-739.
59.
LiebermanE. S.SinghP. (2012a). Conceptualizing and measuring ethnic politics: An institutional complement to demographic, behavioral, and cognitive approaches. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47, 255-268.
60.
LiebermanE. S.SinghP. (2012b). The institutional origins of ethnic violence. Comparative Politics, 45, 1-24.
61.
MarquesJ. M.AbramsD.SerodioR. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
62.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 3, 37-68.
63.
McEwenN.ParryR. (2005). Devolution and the preservation of the United Kingdom welfare state. In McEvenN.MorenoL. (Eds.), The territorial politics of welfare (pp. 41-61). London, England: Routledge.
64.
MiguelE. (2004). Tribe or nation? Nation building and public goods in Kenya versus Tanzania. World Politics, 56, 327-362.
65.
MillJ. S. (1875). Considerations on representative government. London, England: Longmans, Green.
66.
MillerD. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Minorities at Risk Project. (2009). Minorities at risk dataset. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management.
MullenB.BrownR.SmithC. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration?European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
70.
NierJ. A.GaertnerS.DovidioJ.BankerB.WardC. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 299-316.
71.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
72.
PekerM.CrispR. J.HoggM. A. (2010). Predictors of ingroup projection: The roles of superordinate category coherence and complexity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 525-542.
73.
PosenB. R. (1993). The security dilemma and ethnic conflict. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 35, 27-47.
74.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137-174.
75.
RobinsonA. L. (2012). Nationalism and inter-ethnic trust: Evidence from an African border region (Working paper). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
76.
RobinsonF. (1974). Separatism among Indian Muslims: The politics of the United Provinces’ Muslims, 1860-1923. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77.
RoccasS. (2003). The effects of status on identification with multiple groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 351-366.
78.
SachsN. B. (2009). “Experimenting with identity: Islam, nationalism and ethnicity.” In Proceedings of the American Political Science Association. .
79.
SaidemanS. M.AyresR. W. (2008). For kin or country: Xenophobia, nationalism, and war. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
80.
Schrock-JacobsonG. (2012). The violent consequences of the nation nationalism and the initiation of interstate war. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 825-852.
81.
SetaC. E.SetaJ. J. (1992). Observers and participants in an intergroup setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 629-643.
82.
SetaC. E.SetaJ. J. (1996). Big fish in small ponds: A social hierarchy analysis of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1210-1221.
83.
ShayoM. (2009). A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 103, 147-174.
84.
SinghP. (2011). We-ness and welfare: A longitudinal analysis of social development in Kerala, India. World Development, 39, 282-293.
85.
SinghP. (2013). Public goods provision. In KohliA.SinghP. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Indian politics (pp. 230-246). Routledge.
86.
SinghP. (2014). Collective Identity and the Common Good: Subnationalism and Social Development in India. Book manuscript under contract with Cambridge University Press. New York.
87.
SkitkaL. J. (2005). Patriotism or nationalism? Understanding post-September 11, 2001, flag-display behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1995-2011.
88.
SleemanJ. (1973). The welfare state: Its aims, benefits and costs. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
89.
SmithA. D. (1999). Ethnic elections and national destiny: Some religious origins of nationalist ideals. Nations and Nationalism, 5, 331-355.
90.
SpencerP.WollmanH. (2002). Nationalism: A critical introduction. London, England: Sage.
91.
SrinivasM. N. (1962). Caste in modern India and other essays. Bombay, India: Asia Publishing House.
92.
TajfelH.FlamentC.BilligM.BundyR. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.
93.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
94.
TamirY. (1993). Liberal nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
95.
Theiss-MorseE. (2009). Who counts as an American? The boundaires of national identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
96.
TillyC. (2005). Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
97.
TingleyD.TomzM. (2014). Conditional cooperation and climate change. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 344-368.
98.
TransueJ. E. (2007). Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a uniting force. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 78-91.
99.
TriversR. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
100.
VarshneyA. (1993). Contested meanings: India’s national identity, Hindu nationalism, and the politics of anxiety. Daedalus, 122, 227-261.
101.
VarshneyA. (2003). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
102.
WaldzusS.MummendeyA. (2004). Inclusion in a superordinate category, in-group prototypicality, and attitudes towards out-groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 466-477.
103.
WaldzusS.MummendeyA.WenzelM. (2005). When “different” means “worse”: In-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 76-83.
104.
WenzelM.MummendeyA.WaldzusS. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331-372.
WilenskyH. (1975). The welfare state and equality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
107.
WilkinsonS. (2004). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
108.
WilkinsonS. (2008). Which group identities lead to most violence? In KalyvasS. N.ShapiroI.MasoudT. E. (Eds.), Order, conflict, and violence (pp. 271-300). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
109.
WilliamsP.BlockL. G.FitzsimonsG. J. (2006). Simply asking questions about health behaviors increases both healthy and unhealthy behaviors. Social Influence, 1, 117-127.
110.
WimmerA. (2008). The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 970-1022.
111.
WolfeA.KlausenJ. (2000). Identity politics and contemporary liberalism. In HinrichsK.KitscheltH.WiesenthalH. (Eds.), Kontingenz und krise: Institutionspolitik in kapitalistischen und postsozialistischen gesellschaften (pp. 79-101). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Vertrag.
112.
World Values Study Group. (1994). World values survey, 1981-1984 and 1990-1993. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
