We evaluate the role of a new type of democratic institution, participatory budgeting (PB), for improving citizens’ well-being. Participatory institutions are said to enhance governance, citizens’ empowerment, and the quality of democracy, creating a virtuous cycle to improve the poor’s well-being. Drawing from an original database of Brazil’s largest cities over the last 20 years, we assess whether adopting PB programs influences several indicators of well-being inputs, processes, and outcomes. We find PB programs are strongly associated with increases in health care spending, increases in civil society organizations, and decreases in infant mortality rates. This connection strengthens dramatically as PB programs remain in place over longer time frames. Furthermore, PB’s connection to well-being strengthens in the hand of mayors from the nationally powerful, ideologically and electorally motivated Workers’ Party. Our argument directly addresses debates on democracy and well-being and has powerful implications for participation, governance, and economic development.
AbersR. (2000). Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
2.
AquinoR.De OlivieraN. F.BaretoM. (2009). Impact of the family health program on infant mortality in Brazilian municipalities. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 87-93.
3.
AvritzerL. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
AvritzerL. (2009). Participatory institutions in democratic Brazil. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
AvritzerL.NavarroZ. (2003). A Inovação Democrática no Brasil: O Orçamento Participativo [Democratic innovation in Brazil: Participatory budgeting]. São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez.
6.
BaiocchiG. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BaiocchiG.HellerP.SilvaM. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BouldingC.WamplerB. (2010). Voice, votes, and resources: Evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being. World Development, 38, 125-135.
BraumoellerB. F. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization, 58, 807-820.
11.
CampbellT. (2003). The quiet revolution: Decentralization and the rise of political participation in Latin American cities. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
CastlesF. G. (2009). What welfare states do: A disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 45-62.
13.
ClearyM. (2010). The sources of democratic responsiveness in Mexico. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
14.
DagninoE.OliveraA. J.PanfichiA. (2006). Para uma Outra Leitura da Disputa Pela Construção Democrática na América Latina [Toward an alternative reading in the dispute over the construction of democracy in Latin America]. In DagninoE.OlveraA. J.PanfichiA. (Eds.), A Disputa Pela Construção Democrática na América Latina (pp. 13-91). São Paulo, Brazil: Paz e Terra.
15.
de Sousa SantosB. (Ed.). (2005). Democratizing democracy: Beyond the liberal democratic canon. New York, NY: Verso.
16.
de TocquevilleA. (1969). Democracy in America. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
17.
DiamondL. (1999). Developing democracy: Towards consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
DonaghyM. (2011). Do participatory governance institutions matter? Municipal councils and social housing programs in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 44, 83-102.
19.
EatonK. (2004). Politics beyond the capital: The design of subnational institutions in South America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
ElkinsZ. (2000). Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 193-200.
21.
EngleN.LemosM. (2010). Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 20, 4-13.
22.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
23.
FallyT.PaillacarR.TerraC. (2010). Economic geography and wages in Brazil: Evidence from microdata. Journal of Development Economics, 91, 155-168.
24.
FerreiraF. H. G.LeiteP. G.RavallionM. (2010). Poverty reduction without economic growth? Explaining Brazil’s poverty dynamics, 1985-2004. Journal of Development Economics, 93, 20-36.
25.
FungA.WrightE. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York, NY: Verso.
26.
GaventaJ.BarrettG. (2012). Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. World Development, 40, 2399-2410.
27.
GibsonC.WoolcockM. (2008). Empowerment, deliberative development, and local-level politics in Indonesia: Participatory projects as a source of countervailing power. Studies in Comparative International Development, 42, 151-180.
28.
GoldfrankB. (2007). The politics of deepening local democracy: Decentralization, party institutionalization, and participation. Comparative Politics, 39, 147-168.
29.
GoldfrankB. (2011). Deepening local democracy in Latin America: Participation, decentralization and the left. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
30.
HansenB. B. (2004). Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the SAT. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 609-618.
31.
HellerP. (2012). Democracy, participatory politics and development: Some comparative lessons from Brazil, India and South Africa. Polity, 44, 642-665.
32.
HellerP.EvansP. (2010). Taking Tilly south: Durable inequalities, democratic contestation, and citizenship in the Southern Metropolis. Theory and Society, 39, 433-450.
33.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political analysis, 15, 199-236.
34.
HuberE.StephensJ. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
HuberE.StephensJ. D.MustilloT. (2008). Politics and social spending in Latin America. Journal of Politics, 70, 420-436.
36.
HuntingtonS. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.
37.
JensenC. (2009). The politics of welfare services. Aarhus, Denmark: Politica.
38.
KarlT.SchmitterP. (1991). What democracy is . . . and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75-88.
39.
KeckM. (1992). The workers party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
KeyV. O. (1964). Politics, parties and pressure groups. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell.
41.
LabonneJ.ChaseR. S. (2009). Who is at the wheel when communities drive development? Evidence from the Philippines. World Development, 37, 219-231.
42.
McNultyS. (2011). Voice and vote: Decentralization and participation in Post-Fujimori Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
MonteroA.SamuelsD. (2004). Decentralization and democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
44.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
NylenW. R. (2003). Participatory democracy versus elitist democracy: Lessons from Brazil. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
PaimJ.TravassosC.AlmeidaC.BahiaL.MacinkoJ. (2011). The Brazilian health system: History, advances and challenges. The Lancet, 377, 21-27.
47.
PatemanC. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10, 7-19.
48.
PutnamR.LeonardiR.NanettiR. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
49.
RibeiroA. C. T.de GraziaG. (2003). Experiência de Orçamento Participativo no Brasil: Periodo de 1997 a 2000 [Brazilian experiences with participatory budgeting: From 1997 to 2000]. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Vozes.
50.
RossM. (2006). Is democracy good for the poor?American Journal of Political Science, 50, 860-874.
51.
SamuelsD. (2004). From socialism to social democracy: Party organization and the transformation of the workers’ party in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 999-1024.
52.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
53.
SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS.BradyH. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Uneven political voice and the broken promises of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
SintomerY.HerzbergC.AllegrettiG.RockeA. (2011). Learning from the south: Participatory budgeting worldwide—An invitation to global cooperation. Bonn, Germany: Dialog Global.
56.
SnyderR. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 93-110.
57.
StudnickaA. (2010). Corruption and human trafficking in Brazil: Findings from a multi-modal approach. European Journal of Criminology, 7, 29-43.
58.
United Nations. (2011). World urbanization prospects. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
59.
WamplerB. (2007). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
60.
WamplerB. (2012). Transforming representation and enhancing social justice through participatory governance. Polity, 44, 666-682.
61.
WamplerB.AvritzerL. (2004). Participatory publics: Civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil. Comparative Politics, 36, 291-312.
62.
WamplerB.AvritzerL. (2005). The spread of participatory democracy in Brazil: From radical democracy to good government. Journal of Latin American Urban Studies, 7, 37-52.
63.
WamplerB.AvritzerL. (2008). The expansion of participatory budgeting in Brazil (Report to the World Bank Institute). Unpublished manuscript.
64.
World Bank. (2008). Brazil: Toward a more inclusive and effective participatory budget in Porto Alegre (Report No. 40144-BR). Washington, DC: Author.
65.
World Bank. (2011). Evaluacion del Presupuesto Participativo y su Relacion con el Presupuesto por Resultados [Evaluation of participatory budgeting and its relationship to performance budgeting] (Report No. 62588). Washington, DC: Author.
