BeckN. (2006). Is causal-process observation an oxymoron?Political Analysis, 14, 347-352.
2.
BeckN. (2010). Causal process “observation”: Oxymoron or (fine) old wine. Political Analysis, 18, 499-505.
3.
BennettA. (2008). Process tracing: A Bayesian perspective. In Box-SteffensmeierJ.BradyH.CollierD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 702-721). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
BradyH. E. (2010). Data-set observations versus causal-process observations: The 2000 presidential election. In BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (2nd ed., pp. 237-242). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
BradyH. E.CollierD.SeawrightJ. (2006). Toward a pluralistic vision of methodology. Political Analysis, 14, 353-368.
6.
CollierD. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, 823-830.
7.
CollierD.BradyH.SeawrightJ. (2010b). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (2nd ed., pp. 161-199). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
DionD. (1998). Evidence and inference in the comparative case study. Comparative Politics, 30, 127-145.
9.
GeddesB. (1991). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. In StimsonJ. A. (Ed.), Political analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 131-150). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
GeorgeA.BennettA. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GerringJ. (2012). Social science methodology: A unified framework (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GoertzG. (2003). The substantive importance of necessary condition hypotheses. In GoertzG.StarrH. (Eds.), Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications (pp. 65-94). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
HaggardS.KaufmanR. R. (2012). Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule. American Political Science Review, 106, 495-516.
15.
HedströmP.YlikoskiP. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49-67.
16.
HollandP. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
17.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD.YamamotoT. (2011). Unpacking the black box of causality. American Political Science Review, 105, 765-789.
18.
KingG.KeohaneR.VerbaS. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
KreuzerM. (2010). Historical knowledge and quantitative analysis: The case of the origins of proportional representation. American Political Science Review, 104, 369-392.
20.
LottJ. R.Jr. (2000, November14). Gore might lose a second round: Media suppressed the Bush vote. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 23A.
21.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MahoneyJ. (1999). Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1154-1196.
23.
MahoneyJ. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods and Research, 41, 560-590
24.
MooreB.Jr. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston, MA: Beacon.
25.
MorganS.WinshipC. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MortonR.WilliamsK. (2010). From nature to the lab: Experimental political science and the study of causality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
NarangV.NelsonR. (2009). Who are these belligerent democratizers? Reassessing the impact of democratization on war. International Organization, 63, 357-379.
28.
NorkusZ. (2004). Mechanisms as miracle makers? The rise and inconsistencies of the mechanistic approach in social science and history. History and Theory, 44, 348-372.
29.
PearlJ. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
RaginC. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
RaginC. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
RaginC. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
RussettB. (1995). The democratic peace: “and yet it moves.” International Security, 19, 164-175.
34.
SambanisN. (2004). Using case studies to expand economic models of civil war. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 259-279.
35.
SekhonJ. (2004). Quality meets quantity: Case studies, conditional probability, and counterfactuals. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 281-293.
36.
SlaterD.SmithB. (2010). Economic origins of democratic breakdown? Contrary evidence from Southeast Asia and beyond. Unpublished manuscript.
37.
SnyderJ.BorghardE. (2011). The cost of empty threats: A penny, not a pound. American Political Science Review, 105, 437-455.
38.
Van EveraS. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
WaltzK. (1979). Theory of international politics. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.