This analysis fills an important lacuna in comparative legislative studies by testing the veto players theory against a newly constructed data set of significant domestic policy legislation passed in the Republic of Ireland between 1949 and 2000. Distinguishing between single-party majority, coalition, and minority governments, the analysis places into sharp relief the ways in which the unique context of Irish political parties and institutional dynamics conflict with the basic tenets of the veto players framework. The results underscore the contextual constraints on applicability of the theory.
Bawn, K. ( 1999). Money and majorities in the Federal Republic of Germany: Evidence for a veto players model of government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 707-736.
2.
Blais, A., Blake, D., & Dion, S. ( 1993). Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 40-62.
3.
Blais, A., Blake, D., & Dion, S. ( 1996). Do parties make a difference? A reappraisal. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 514-520.
4.
Budge, I., Klingemann, H., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. ( 2001). Mapping policy preferences: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945-1998. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. ( 1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Carroll, J. ( 1992, November 2). Collapse of coalition would leave much work unfinished. Irish Times, p. 5.
7.
Castles, F., & Mair, P. ( 1970). The government and politics of Ireland. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Castles, F., & Mair, P. ( 1984). Left-Right political scales: Some expert judgments. European Journal of Political Research, 12, 73-88.
9.
Chubb, B. ( 1970). The government and politics of Ireland. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Collins, N. ( 2004). Parliamentary democracy in Ireland. Parliamentary Affairs, 57, 601-612.
11.
Collins, S. ( 1996). The Cosgrave legacy. Dublin: Blackwater Press.
12.
Connolly, E., & O’Halpin, E. (1999). The government and the governmental system. In J. Coakley & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Politics in the Republic of Ireland (pp. 249-270). New York: PSAI Press.
13.
Cooney, J. ( 1988, February 18). Haughey defeat may spark snap election. The Times.
14.
Coghlan, D. ( 1993a, July 3). Doing business in the Dáil. Irish Times, p. 12.
15.
Coghlan, D. ( 1993b, October 1). Next three months could make or break government . Irish Times, p. 12.
16.
Coghlan, D. ( 1995, 14 December). Government built from modest beginnings: Fine Gael, the Labour Party and democratic left have completed a satisfactory, if uninspiring, first year in government. Irish Times, p. 10.
17.
Coghlan, D. ( 1994, September 2). Spring demands will strain coalition. Irish Times, p. 9.
18.
Debus, M. ( 2007). Pre-electoral alliances, coalition rejections, and multiparty governments. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
19.
Elgie, R. ( 1999). The president and the taoiseach. In J. Coakley & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Politics in the republic of Ireland (pp. 232-248). New York: PSAI Press.
20.
Farrell, D. ( 1999). Ireland: A party system transformed? In D. Broughton & M. Donovan (Eds.), Changing party systems in Western Europe (pp. 30-47). London : Pinter.
21.
Fitzgibbon, C. ( 1973). The life and times of Eamon de Valera. New York: Macmillan.
22.
Ford, R. ( 1987, February 21). Fianna Fáil banking on disorder of opposition. The Times.
23.
Fukumoto, K. ( 2008). Legislative production in comparative perspective: Cross-sectional study of 42 countries and time-Series analysis of the Japan case. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 9, 1-19.
24.
Gallagher, M. ( 1999). Republic of Ireland. In R. Elgie (Ed.), Semi-presidentialism in Europe (pp. 104-23). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
Hardiman, N. ( 2004). From conflict to coordination: Economic governance and political innovation in Ireland. West European Politics, 25, 1-25.
26.
Harvey, B. ( 1978). Cosgrave’s coalition. Harrow, UK: Eureditions.
27.
Hoffman, J. ( 2004). Generalized linear models: An applied approach. New York: Pearson.
28.
Howell, W., Adler, S., Cameron, C., & Riemann, C. ( 2000). Divided government and the legislative productivity of Congress, 1947-94. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 285-312.
29.
Irish statute book 1922-2001: Acts of the Oireachtas, statutory instruments, chronological tables. (2002). Dublin: Lendac Data Systems.
30.
Jitters dissolved with Dáil as phoney war ends. Drapier-An insider’s guide to politics. (1997, May 17). Irish Times , p. 9.
31.
Kennedy, G. ( 1997, January 31). Government’s Dáil programme suggests an election in June. Irish Times, p. 1.
32.
Keogh, D. ( 1994). Twentieth-century Ireland. New York : St. Martin’s.
33.
King, D. ( 1986). The public sector growth and state autonomy in Western Europe: The changing role and scope of the state in Ireland Since 1950. West European Politics, 9, 81-96.
34.
Kreppel, A. ( 1997). The impact of parties in government on legislative output in Italy. European Journal of Political Research, 31, 327-350.
35.
Laver, M., & Benoit, K. ( 2002). Locating TDs in policy spaces using computer word-scoring . Irish Political Studies, 17, 59-72.
36.
Laver, M., & Benoit, K. ( 2003). Estimating Irish party policy positions using computer wordscoring: The 2002 election. Irish Political Studies, 18, 97-107.
37.
Laver, M., & Hunt, W.B. ( 1992). Policy and party competition. London : Routledge.
38.
Laver, M., & Shepsle, K. (Eds.). (1996). Making and breaking governments: Cabinets and legislatures in parliamentary democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Long, J.S., & Freese, J. ( 2003). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press, Stata Corporation.
40.
Lutz, K.G. ( 2003). Irish party competition in the new millennium: Change, or plus ça change?Irish Political Studies, 18, 40-59.
41.
Mair, P., & Weeks, L. ( 2006). The party system. In J. Coakley & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Politics in the Republic of Ireland (4th ed., pp. 135-159). New York: Routledge.
42.
Martin, L.W. ( 2004). The government agenda in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 445-461.
43.
Martin, M. ( 2001). Freedom to choose: The formation of Irish political parties, 1918-1932. Chester Springs, PA: Dufour Editions.
44.
Mayhew, D. ( 1991). Divided we govern: Party control, lawmaking, and investigations 1946-1990. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.
45.
Mr Haughey loses his touch. (1989, June 19). The Independent, p. 20.
46.
Munger, M. ( 2004). Veto players. The Independent Review , 9, 297-299.
47.
Murphy, J.A. ( 1975). Ireland in the twentieth century. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, Ltd.
48.
Murphy, M.C. ( 2006). Reform of Dáil Éireann: The dynamics of parliamentary change. Parliamentary Affairs, 59, 437-453.
49.
O’Connor, K. ( 1999). Sweetie: How Haughey spent the money. Dublin: K.O. Publications.
50.
Shvetsova, O. ( 2003). Review of Tsebelis, veto players. Perspectives on Politics, 1, 444-445.
51.
Sinnott, R. ( 1995). Irish voters decide: Voting behaviour in elections and referendums since 1918. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
52.
Steunenberg, B. ( 2004). Review of Tsebelis, veto players. West European Politics, 27, 535-536.
53.
Strøm, K. ( 1990). Minority government and majority rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Tsebelis, G. ( 1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 289-325.
55.
Tsebelis, G. ( 1999). Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 93, 591-608.
56.
Tsebelis, G. ( 2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Tynan, M. ( 1999a, May 3). Coalition strained by Ahern stance on Sheedy . Irish Times, p. 1.
58.
Tynan, M. ( 1999b, May 6). Problem has been dealt with but scar remains . Irish Times, p. 7.
59.
What the independent TDs said. (1997, June 27). Irish Times , p. 9.
