This article analyzes the formation of a stable dominant party in an authoritarian regime as a commitment problem between two sides: the ruler and other elites. After defining a dominant party regime and outlining the costs and benefits that such a regime entails for each side, the authors examine the efforts made in Russia to establish United Russia as a dominant party and argue that the Kremlin and regional elites have overcome their commitment problem through mutual investment in the United Russia party. In contrast to previous party-of-power projects, United Russia represents an equilibrium arrangement between the federal center and other political and economic elite actors.
Baturin, A.L., Yu., M., Satarov, V.F., Il'in, V.V., Kadatskii, M.A., Kostikov, A., et al. (2001). Epokha Yel'tsina: ocherki politicheskoi istorii. [The Yeltsin epoch: Sketches for a political history]. Moscow: Vagrius.
2.
Belin, L., & Orttung, R. (1997). The Russian parliamentary elections of 1995: The battle for the Duma. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
3.
Brownlee, J. (2004). Durable authoritarianism in an age of democracy . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University , Princeton, NJ.
4.
Chaisty, P. (2005). Majority control and executive dominance: Parliament-president relations in Putin's Russia. In A. Pravda (Ed.), Leading Russia: Putin in perspective. Essays in honour of Archie Brown (pp. 119-138). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
Chaisty, P. (2006). Legislative politics and economic power in Russia . New York: Palgrave.
6.
Colton, T.J., & McFaul, M. (2003). Popular choice and managed democracy: The Russian elections of 1999 and 2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7.
Cox, G.W. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Cox, G.W., & Morgenstern, S. (2002). Epilogue: Latin America's reactive assemblies and proactive presidents. In S. Morgenstern & B. Nacif (Eds.), Legislative politics in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
D'Anieri, P. (2007). Understanding Ukrainian politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
10.
Gandhi, J., & Przeworski, A. (2006). Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships. Economics and Politics , 18(1), 1-26.
11.
Garadzha, N. (Ed.). (2006). Suverenitet. Sbornik. [Sovereignty: A collection]. Moscow : Evropa.
12.
Geddes, B. (1999a, September). Authoritarian breakdown: Empirical test of a game theoretic argument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.
13.
Geddes, B. (1999b). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 115-144.
14.
Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Gel'man, V. (2006). From "feckless pluralism" to dominant power politics? The transformation of Russia's party system. Democratization , 13(4), 545-561.
16.
Golosov, G. (2003). Political parties in the regions of Russia. London: Lynne Rienner.
17.
Hale, H. (2004). Party development in a federal system. In P. Reddaway & R. Orttung (Eds.), The dynamics of Russian politics: Putin's reform of federal-regional relations (Vol. 2, pp. 179-211). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
18.
Hale, H. (2006). Why not parties in Russia? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Harasymiw, B. (1984). Political elite recruitment in the Soviet Union . New York: St. Martin's.
20.
Haspel, M., Remington, T.F., & Smith, S.S. (2006). Lawmaking and decree making in the Russian Federation: Time, space, and rules in Russian national policymaking. Post-Soviet Affairs, 22(5), 249-275.
21.
Hough, J.F. (1969). The Soviet prefects: The local party organs in industrial decision-making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Hough, J.F., & Fainsod, M. (1979). How the Soviet Union is governed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Huntington, S.P. (1970). Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems. In S. Huntington & C. Moore (Eds.), Authoritarian politics in modern society: The dynamics of established one-party systems (pp. 3-47). New York: Basic Books.
24.
Kitschelt, H. (1995). Formation of party cleavages in post-communist democracies. Party Politics, 1(4), 447-472.
25.
Kunicova, J., & Remington, T.F. . (2008). Mandates, parties, and dissent: The effect of electoral rules on parliamentary party cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994-2003. Party Politics.14,555-574.
26.
Kynev, A. (2006). Politicheskii Partii v Rossiskikh Regionakh: Vzglyad cherez prizmu regional'nyi izbiratel'noi reformy. [Political parties in Russian regions: A view through the prism of regional electoral reform]. Polis, 6, 145-160.
27.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2002). Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51-65.
28.
Makarenko, B. (2006). Novyi zakon o vyborakh i evoliutsiia rezhima. [The new law on elections and the evolution of the regime]. Pro et Contra, 10(1), 95-101.
29.
McFaul, M. (2001). Russia's unfinished revolution: Political change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
McMann, K.M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy: Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Migdal, J. (1988). Strong societies and weak states. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Petrov, N. (2006). Naznacheniya Gubernatorov: Itogi Pervogo Goda. [The appointments of governors: Experience of the first year]. Moscow Carnegie Center Briefing, 8(3), 1-8.
33.
Przeworski A., Alvarez, M.E., Cheibub, J.A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Remington, T.F. (1988). The truth of authority: Ideology and communication in the Soviet Union. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
35.
Remington, T.F. (2006). Presidential support in the Russian State Duma . Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31(1), 5-32.
36.
Reuter, O.J. (2007). The origins of dominant parties in authoritarian regimes. Working paper, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
37.
Rigby, T.H. (1968). Communist Party membership in the U.S.S.R., 1917-1967 . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Sakwa, R. (2003). Elections and national integration in Russia. In V. Hesli & W. M. Reisinger (Eds.), The 1999-2000 elections in Russia: Their impact and legacy (pp. 121-141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Schedler, A. (Ed.). (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
40.
Shugart, M.S. (1998). The inverse relationship between party strength and executive strength: A theory of politicians' constitutional choices. British Journal of Political Science, 28, 1-29.
41.
Shvetsova, O. (2003). Resolving the problem of preelection coordination: The 1999 parliamentary election as an elite presidential primary. In V. Hesli & W. M. Reisinger (Eds.), The 1999-2000 elections in Russia: Their impact and legacy (pp. 213-231). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Slider, D. (2005). Politics in the regions. In S. White, Z. Gitleman , & R. Sakwa (Eds.), Developments in Russian politics (6th ed., pp. 168-185). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
Slider, D. (2006, December). United Russia and Russia's governors: The path to a one-party system. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies National Convention, Washington, D.C., November 16-19, 2006.
44.
Smith, B. (2005). Life of the party: the origins of regime breakdown and persistence under single-party rule. World Politics, 57, 421-451.
45.
Smyth, R. (2002). Building state capacity from the inside out: Parties of power and the success of the president's reform agenda in Russia. Politics & Society, 30(4), 555-578.
46.
Smyth, R. (2006). Candidate strategies and electoral competition in the Russian Federation: Democracy without foundation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Sonin, K., & Egorov, G. (2005). Dictators and their viziers: Agency problems in dictatorships. Unpublished paper, New Economic School, Moscow.
48.
Suverennaia demokratiia.Ot idei-k doktrine [Sovereign democracy: From idea to doctrine]. (2007). Moscow: Evropa.
49.
Turovsky, R. (2006). Regionalnye vybori v Rossii: Sluchai atipichnoi demokratii. [Regional elections in Russia: Cases of an atypical democracy] . In B. Makarenko (Ed.), Tekhnologii Politiki (pp. 143-190). Moscow: Center for Political Technologies.
50.
Voslensky, M. (1984). Nomenklatura: Anatomy of the Soviet ruling class . London: Bodley Head.
51.
Way, L. (2005). Authoritarian state building and the sources of regime competitiveness in the fourth wave: The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics, 57, 231-261.
52.
Weldon, J. (1997). Political sources of presidencialismo in Mexico . In S. Mainwaring & M. S. Shugart (Eds.), Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America (pp. 225-258). New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
White, S., Rose, R., & McAllister, I. (1997). How Russia votes. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
54.
Widner, J.A. (1992). The rise of a party-state in Kenya: From Harambee! to Nyayo!Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
Wilson, A. (2205). Virtual politics: Faking democracy in the post-Soviet world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
Wilson, K. (2006). Party-system development under Putin. Post-Soviet Affairs, 22(4), 314-348.
