This article examines how litigation before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has contributed to the development of social rights. It argues that variations in the nature of supranational rights, powers of supranational courts, and ease of access influence the opportunities individuals have to engage these courts to enforce and expand entitlement to social protection. It demonstrates that individuals have pursued social-rights claims at a much higher rate before the ECJ than the ECHR but have also begun to respond to creative ECHR interpretation that extends social rights in directions not available under European Union law. In weaving together a complementary but not a comprehensive set of social protections, the two supranational courts are constructing a safety net that extends well beyond the original intentions of member countries and empowers some of the most vulnerable members of society.
Alter, K. (2001). Establishing the supremacy of European law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Alter, K. (2006). Private litigants and the new international courts. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 22-49.
3.
Alter, K., & Meunier, S. (1994). Judicial politics in the European community. Comparative Political Studies, 26, 535-561.
4.
Alter, K., & Vargas, J. (2000). Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies. Comparative Political Studies, 32, 452-482.
5.
Börzel, T. (2006). Participation through law enforcement: The case of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 128-152.
6.
Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Cichowski, R. (1998). Integrating the environment. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 387-405.
8.
Cichowski, R. (2004). Women’s rights, the European Court, and supranational constitutionalism. Law & Society Review, 38, 489-512.
9.
Cichowski, R. (2006). Courts, rights, and democratic participation. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 50-75.
10.
Cichowski, R., & Stone Sweet, A. (2003). Participation, representative democracy, and the courts. In B. Cain, R. Dalton, & S. Scarrow (Eds.), Democracy transformed? (pp. 192-220). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Commission Regulation 1251/70. (1970, June 30). Right of workers to remain. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 142, 24-26.
12.
Conant, L. (2002). Justice contained. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
Conant, L. (2003). Europe’s no fly zone. In T. Börzel & R. Cichowski (Eds.), The state of the European Union (Vol. 6, pp. 235-250). New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Conant, L. (2004). Contested boundaries. In J. Migdal (Ed.), Boundaries and belonging (pp. 284-317). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Council Directive 221/64. (1964, April 4). Co-ordination of special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 56, 850-857.
16.
Council Directive 360/68. (1968, October 19). Abolition of restrictions on movement and residence. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 257, 13-16.
17.
Council Directive 34/75. (1975, January 20). Right of nationals of a member state to remain. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 14, 10-13.
18.
Council Directive 7/79. (1979, January 10). Progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 6, 24-25.
19.
Council Directive 364/90. (1990, July 13). Right of residence. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 180, 26-27.
20.
Council Directive 365/90. (1990, July 13). Right of residence for persons who ceased their occupational activity. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 180, 28-29.
21.
Council Directive 96/93. (1993, December 18). Right of residence for students. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 317, 59-60.
22.
Council of Europe. (1950, November 4). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11. Rome.
23.
Council of Europe.(1953, December11). Convention on Social and Medical Assistance. Paris.
24.
Council of Europe. (1972, December 14). Convention on Social Security. Paris.
25.
Council Regulation 1612/68. (1968). Freedom of movement for workers. Official Journal of the European Communities, II, 475.
26.
Council Regulation 1408/71. (1971). Application of social security schemes. Official Journal of the European Communities, II, 416.
27.
Council Regulation 1247/92. (1992, June). Amending regulation 1408/71. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 136, 1-6.
28.
Court of First Instance. (1999). Case T-264/97, ECR 1999: FP-IA-1, II-1.
29.
Daly, M. (2002, May). Access to social rights in Europe. Adopted by the European Committee for Social Cohesion. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
30.
Elman, R. (2000). The limits of citizenship. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38, 729-749.
31.
Epp, C. (1998). The rights revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
European Community (EC). (2002, December 24). Treaty establishing the European Community [consolidated version]. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 325, 33-184.
33.
European Court of Human Rights. (1968). Use of languages, Application Nos. 1474/62, 1677/62, 1691/62.
34.
European Court of Human Rights. (1971). De Wilde et al. v. Belgium, Application Nos. 2832/66, 2835/66, 2899/66.
35.
European Court of Human Rights. (1982a). Campbell & Cosans v. United Kingdom, Application Nos. 7511/76, 7743/76.
36.
European Court of Human Rights. (1982b). Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, Application No. 7906/77.
37.
European Court of Human Rights.(1983a). Van der Mussele v. Belgium, Application No. 8919/80.
38.
European Court of Human Rights. (1983b). X & Y v. United Kingdom, Application No. 9369/81.
39.
European Court of Human Rights. (1990). Darby v. Sweden, Application No. 11581/85.
40.
European Court of Human Rights. (1994). Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, Application No. 13580/88.
41.
European Court of Human Rights. (1996). Gaygusuz v. Austria, Application No. 17371/90.
42.
European Court of Human Rights. (1997a). Van Raalte v. Netherlands, Application No. 20060/92.
43.
European Court of Human Rights. (1997b). X, Y, & Z v. United Kingdom, Application No. 21830/93.
44.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002a). Willis v. United Kingdom, Application No. 36042/97.
45.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002b). Sawdenv. United Kingdom, Application No. 38550/97.
46.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002c). Downie v. United Kingdom, Application No. 40161/98.
47.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002d). Loffelman v. United Kingdom, Application No. 44585/98.
48.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002e). Rice v. United Kingdom, Application No. 65905/01.
49.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002f). Matthews v. United Kingdom, Application No. 40302/98.
50.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002g). Buchen v. Czech Republic, Application No. 36541/97.
51.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002h). Vasilopoulouv. Greece, Application No. 47541/99.
52.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002i). Wessels-Bergevoet v. Netherlands, Application No. 34462/97.
53.
European Court of Human Rights. (2002j). Frette v. France, Application No. 36515/97.
54.
European Court of Human Rights. (2003a). Atkinson v. United Kingdom, Application No. 65334/01.
55.
European Court of Human Rights. (2003b). Koua Poirrez v. France, Application No. 40892/98.
56.
European Court of Human Rights. (2004a). Owens v. United Kingdom, Application No. 61036/00.
57.
European Court of Human Rights. (2004b). Asmundssonv. Iceland, Application No. 60669/00.
58.
European Court of Justice. (1972). Frilli, Case C-1/72, European Court Reports, 457.
59.
European Court of Justice. (1985a). Vera Hoeckx, Case C-249/83, European Court Reports, 973.
60.
European Court of Justice. (1985b). Scrivner, Case C-122/84, European Court Reports, 1027.
61.
European Court of Justice. (1986a). Kempf, Case C-0139/85, European Court Reports, 1741.
62.
European Court of Justice. (1986b). Reed, Case C-59/85, European Court Reports, 1283.
63.
European Court of Justice. (1987). Lebon, Case C-216/85, European Court Reports, 2811.
64.
European Court of Justice. (1992). Commission v. Belgium, Case C-326/90, European Court Reports, I-5517.
65.
European Court of Justice. (1996). Commission v. Belgium, Case C-278/94, European Court Reports, I-4307.
66.
European Court of Justice. (1997). Commission v. Germany, Case C-96/95, European Court Reports, I-1653.
67.
European Court of Justice. (1998a). Sala, Case C-85/96, European Court Reports, I-2691.
68.
European Court of Justice. (1998b). Grant, Case C-249/96, European Court Reports, I-621.
69.
European Court of Justice. (2000). Commission v. Italy, Case C-424/98, European Court Reports, I-4001.
70.
European Court of Justice. (2001a). Grzelczyk, Case C-184/99, European Court Reports, I-6193.
71.
European Court of Justice. (2001b). Offermanns & Offermanns, Case C-85/99, European Court Reports, I-2261.
72.
European Court of Justice. (2001c). Khalil et al., Case C-95-98/99 & C-180/99, European Court Reports, I-7413.
73.
European Court of Justice. (2002a). D’Hoop, Case C-224/98, EuropeanCourt Reports, I-6191.
74.
European Court of Justice. (2002b). Baumbast & R, Case C-413/99, European Court Reports, I-7901.
75.
European Court of Justice. (2004a). Trojani, Case C-456-02, European Court Reports, not yet reported.
76.
European Court of Justice. (2004b). Zhu & Chen, Case C-200/02, European Court Reports, not yet reported.
77.
European Court of Justice. (2004c). Collins, Case C-138/02, European Court Reports, not yet reported.
78.
European Court of Justice. (2005). Bidar, Case C-209/03, European Court Reports, not yet reported.
79.
European Union. (2003, July 19). Draft treaty establishing a constitution for Europe (CONV 850/03).
80.
Ferejohn, J., & Weingast, B. (1992). A positive theory of statutory interpretation. International Review of Law and Economics, 12, 263-279.
81.
Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead. Law & Society Review, 9, 95-160.
82.
Garrett, G. (1992). International cooperation and institutional choice. International Organization, 46, 533-560.
83.
Gilliom, J. (2001). Overseers of the poor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84.
Guiraudon, V. (1999). The Marshallian triptych re-ordered (EUI Working Paper EUF No. 99/1). San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy: European University Institute.
85.
Guiraudon, V. (2000). European courts and foreigners rights. International Migration Review, 34, 1088-1125.
86.
Haas, E. (1958). The uniting of Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
87.
Handler, J. (2004). Social citizenship and workfare in the United States and Western Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88.
Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (1992). Pressure through law. New York: Routledge.
89.
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards juristocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90.
Jensen, L. (2003). Patriots, settlers, and the origins of American social policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
91.
Joppke, C. (2001). The legal-domestic sources of immigrant rights. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 339-366.
92.
Kelemen, R. D. (2006). Suing for Europe: Adversarial legalism and European governance. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 101-127.
93.
Moravcsik, A. (2000). The origins of human rights regimes. International Organization, 54, 217-252.
94.
Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95.
Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
96.
Spiller, P., & Gely, R. (1992). The political economy of Supreme Court constitutional settings. International Review of Law and Economics, 12, 45-67.
97.
Stone Sweet, A. (2004). The judicial construction of Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
98.
Weiler, J. (1991). The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal, 100, 2403-2483.
99.
Zürn, M., & Joerges, C. (Eds.). (2005). Law and governance in postnational Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
