What explains low levels of trust in government institutions in democratizing Latin American countries? The authors examine this question in the Dominican Republic, employing data from three surveys conducted over 1994 to 2001. Their analysis finds that trust in government institutions is shaped primarily by perceptions of economic and political performance by government. There is little evidence of a relationship between civic engagement and institutional trust, and no relationship between democratic values and institutional trust. They find a curvilinear effect between socioeconomic status and institutional trust, with middle-sector groups significantly less trusting of government institutions than either the poor or the wealthy. Age has a nonlinear effect as older generations, who experienced authoritarianism as children, are considerably more trusting of democratic institutions, contradicting predictions by culturalist early-life socialization arguments. The authors conclude that low trust per se is not the major challenge for governance.
Bratton, M. (2002, August). Wide but shallow: Popular support for democracy in Africa (AfrobarometerWorking Papers No. 19). Available from www.Afrobarometer.org
2.
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999-1023.
3.
Camp, R. A., (Ed.). (2001). Citizen views of democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
4.
Citrin, J., & Muste, C. (1999). Trust in government. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes(pp. 465-532). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5.
Corporación Latinobarómetro. (2002). Latinobarometer poll 2002. Santiago, Chile: Author. Available from www.latinobarometro.org
6.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
7.
Dalton, R. J. (2000). Value change and democracy. In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries(pp. 252-269). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
Diamond, L., Hartlyn, J., & Linz, J. J. (1999). Introduction: Politics, society, and democracy in Latin America. In L. Diamond, J. Hartlyn, J. J. Linz, & S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Democracy in developing countries: Latin America(2nd ed., pp. 1-70). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
10.
Domínguez, J. I., & Shifter, M. (Eds). (2003). Constructing democratic governance in Latin America(2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Duarte, I., & Brea, R. (2002). ¿Hacia dónde va la democracia dominicana? 1994-2001[Where is Dominican democracy going: 1994-2001]. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra & Asociación Dominicana Pro-Bienestar de la Familia.
12.
Duarte, I., Brea, R.,& Tejada Holguín, R. (1998). Cultura política y democracia en la República Dominicana, 1997[Political culture and democracy in the Dominican Republic, 1997]. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra & Asociación Dominicana Pro-Bienestar de la Familia.
13.
Duarte, I., Brea, R., & Tejada Holguín, R., & Báez, C. (1996). Cultura política y democracia en la República Dominicana: informe final de la Encuesta Cultura Política y Democracia (DEMOS 94)[Political culture and democracy in the Dominican Republic: Final report of the Political Culture and Democracy Survey (DEMOS 94)]. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra.
14.
Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Easton, D. (1975). Areassessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 435-457.
16.
Espinal, R. (1987). Autoritarismo y democracia en la política dominicana[Authoritarianism and democracy in Dominican politics]. San José, Costa Rica: Ediciones Capel.
17.
Espinal, R. (2001). La sociedad civil movilizada y las reformas democráticas en la República Dominicana [Mobilized civil society and democratic reforms in the Dominican Republic]. Revista Espiral, 7(21), 101-132.
18.
Espinal, R., & Hartlyn, J. (1999). Dominican Republic: The long and difficult struggle for democracy. In L. Diamond, J. Hartlyn, J. J. Linz,& S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Democracy in developing countries: Latin America(2nd ed., pp. 469-518). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
19.
Evans, G., & Whitefield, S. (1995). The politics and economics of democratic commitment: Support for democracy in transition societies. British Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 485-514.
20.
Finkel, S. E. (2002). Civic education and the mobilization of political participation in developing democracies. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 994-1020.
21.
Finkel, S. E. (2003). Can democracy be taught?Journal of Democracy, 14(4), 137-151.
22.
Finkel, S. E., Sabatini, C. A., & Bevis, G. C. (2000). Civic education, civil society, and political mistrust in a developing democracy: The case of the Dominican Republic. World Development, 28(11), 1851-1874.
23.
Fiorina, M. P. (1978). Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A microanalysis. American Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 426-443.
24.
Friedrich, R. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 797-833.
25.
Hartlyn, J. (1998). The struggle for democratic politics in the Dominican Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
26.
Inglehart, R. (1999). Postmodernization erodes respect for authority, but increases support for democracy. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 236-256). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Inter-American Development Bank. (2000). Development beyond economics: Economic and social progress in Latin American 2000 report. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
Inter-American Development Bank, Regional Operations Department II. (2001, July 21). Dominican Republic: Country paper. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
Kelly, J. M. (2003). Counting on the past or investing in the future? Economic and political accountability in Fujimori's Peru. Journal of Politics, 65(3), 864-880.
30.
Lagos, M. (2001). How people view democracy: Between stability and crisis in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 137-145.
31.
Lagos, M. (2003). A road with no return?Journal of Democracy, 14(2), 163-173.
32.
Levi, M.,& Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507.
33.
Lewis-Beck, M. (1985). Pocketbook voting in U.S. national election studies: Fact or artifact?American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 348-356.
34.
Lewis-Beck, M., & Paldam, M. (2000). Economic voting: An introduction. Electoral Studies, 19, 113-121.
35.
Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1987). The confidence gap: Business, labor, and government in the public mind(rev. ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
Lozano, W. (2002). Después de los Caudillos[After the Caudillos]. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: FLACSO—Librería La Trinitaria.
37.
MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 597-611.
38.
Miller, A.,& Listhaug, O. (1999). Political performance and institutional trust. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government(pp. 204-216). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. Journal of Politics, 59(2), 418-451.
40.
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust: Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. ComparativePolitical Studies, 34(1), 30-62.
41.
Newton, K. (1999). Social and political trust in established democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government(pp. 169-187). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture, or performance? In S. J. Pharr& R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries(pp. 52-73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Norris, P. (1999a). Conclusions: The growth of critical citizens and its consequences. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government(pp. 257-272). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999b). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
Norris, P. (1999c). Introduction: The growth of critical citizens? In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government(pp. 1-27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
O'Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 137-145.
47.
Payne, M., Zovatto, D. G., Carrillo Florez, F., & Allamand Zavala, A. (2002). Democracies in development: Politics and reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
Pharr, S. J. (2000). Officials’ misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral democracies. In S. J. Pharr& R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 173-201). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Portes, A., & Hoffman, K. (2003). Latin American class structures: Their composition and change during the neoliberal era. Latin American Research Review, 38(1), 41-82.
51.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Putnam, R. (1995a). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 65-78.
53.
Putnam, R. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
54.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
55.
Seligson, M. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408-433.
56.
Tarrow, S. (2000). Mad cows and social activists: Contentious politics in the trilateral democracies. In S. J. Pharr& R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries(pp. 270-290). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Turner, F. C., & Martz, J. D. (1997). Institutional confidence and democratic consolidation in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development, 32(3), 65-84.
58.
Warren, M. E. (Ed.). (1999). Democracy and trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
