The extraordinary success of gender quotas in the 1998 Peruvian municipal elections defies conventional wisdom in electoral studies. This article evaluates several institutional variables that are prominently featured in the literature and several others that were “discovered” in Peru, using pooled ordinary least squares regression models and original data sets. Two of the newly discovered variables—effective quotas and seats guaranteed by the effective quota and the relative magnitude of the largest party—were the most important determinants of female electoral success at the provincial level and in districts outside Lima, whereas collective action stimulated by quota legislation made a difference in the capital. In contrast, district magnitude—widely considered to be the most important variable in party-list systems—had no impact. The article extends its principal findings beyond Peru, argues that quotas can follow diverging logics in different electoral systems, and suggests directions for future research.
Bermúdez Valdivia, V. (1998). Mecanismos legales de promoción de la participación política de la mujer en la región andina [Legal mechanisms for the promotion of women’s political participation in the Andean region]. In Memorias de la cumbre parlamentaria andina sobre la mujer[Memoirs of the Andean parliamentary summit on women] (pp. 25-55). Guayaquil, Ecuador: Fondo de la Comisión Europea para ONGs Latinoamericanas.
2.
Blondet, C. (1999). Percepción ciudadana sobre la participación de la mujer: El poder político en la mira de las mujeres[Citizens’ perception regarding women’s participation: Political power in the (gun) sights of women]. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
3.
4.
Dahlerup, D. (1998). Using quotas to increase women’s political representation. In A. Karam (Ed.), Women in parliament: Beyond numbers(pp. 91-106). Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.
5.
Daley, S. (2001, 4 February). France’s most courted: Women to join the ticket. The New York Times, pp. 1-1, 8-8.
6.
Diario Official. (2003, January). Untitled decree modifying the COFIPE, June 24, 2002. Available http://www.gobernacion.gob.mx/dof/dof_24-06-2002.pdf
7.
Htun, M. N., & Jones, M. P. (2002). Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: Electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In N. Craske & M. Molyneux (Eds.), Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America(pp. 32-56). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
8.
9.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. (1993). Perú: Mapa de necesidades básicas insatisfechas de los hogares a nivel distrital[Peru: Map of unsatisfied basic needs of households at the district level]. Lima, Peru: Author.
10.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2002, December). Women in national parliaments. Available at http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm
11.
Jones, M. P. (1995). Aguide to the electoral systems of the Americas. Electoral Studies, 14, 5-21.
12.
Jones, M. P. (1996). Increasingwomen’s representation via gender quotas: The Argentine ley de cupos. Women and Politics, 16, 75-98.
13.
Jones, M. P. (1998). Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: Lessons from the Argentine provinces. Comparative Political Studies, 31, 3-21.
14.
Jones, M. P. (2000). Gender quotas. In R. Rose (Ed.), International encyclopedia of elections(pp. 143-144). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
15.
Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE). (1997). Elecciones municipales 1995-1996[Municipal elections 1995-1996]. Lima, Peru: Author.
16.
Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE). (1999). Elecciones municipales 1998 y complementarias 1999: Resultados generales[1998 municipal elections and 1999 complementary elections: General results]. Lima, Peru: Author.
17.
Matland, R. E. (1993). Institutional variables affecting female representation in national legislatures: The case of Norway. Journal of Politics, 55, 737-755.
18.
Matland, R. E. (1998). Enhancing women’s political participation: Legislative recruitment and electoral systems. In A. Karam (Ed.), Women in parliament: Beyond numbers(pp. 65-88). Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.
19.
Mujeres en el poder... y el poder de las mujeres [Women in power... and the power of women]. (1999, March 8). El Comercio(Lima).
20.
Nickson, R. A. (1995). Local government in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
21.
PROMUJER. (1998). Poder político con perfume de mujer: Las cuotas en el Perú[Political power with women’s perfume: Quotas in Peru]. Lima, Peru: Movimiento Manuela Ramos and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
22.
PROMUJER. (1999). Se triplica presencia de mujeres en los gobiernos locales [Presence of women in local governments triples]. El Cuarto Femenino, 3, 4-7.
23.
Reynolds, A. (1999). Women in the legislatures and executives of the world: Knocking at the highest glass ceiling. World Politics, 51, 547-572.
24.
Schmidt, G. D. (2001, August). Accounting for unexpected success: Gender quotas without placement mandates in Peruvian municipal elections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
25.
Schmidt, G. D. (2002a, March). All the president’s women: Fujimori and gender equity in Peruvian politics. Paper presented at conference on the Fujimori legacy sponsored by the North-South Center of the University of Miami and the University of Delaware, Washington, DC.
26.
Schmidt, G. D. (2002b, August). Dale uno a la mujer: Preference voting and gender quotas in Peru. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
27.
United Nations Development Programme. (2001). Human development report 2001. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Valdivia Cano, R. (2000). Diccionario de derecho electoral peruano[Dictionary of Peruvian electoral law]. Lima, Peru: Editorial Gráfica Faval.
29.
Women’s Leadership Conference of the Americas. (2001). Women and power in the Americas: A report card. Washington, DC: Inter-American Dialogue and International Center for Research on Women.
30.
Yáñez, A. M. (1999). Participación política y liderazgo de la mujer [Political participation and leadership of women]. Socialismo y Participación, 85, 107-114.
