The authors demonstrate that interpersonal trust is an important factor in motivating protest participation and raising the intensity of protest. They suggest that high levels of trust make individuals likely to anticipate low expected costs of participation while leading to optimistic estimates of the potential benefits of protest. Using 1990 World Values Survey data for 33 countries, a series of multinomial logistic regressions confirms that interpersonal trust plays an important role in determining both militant and nonmilitant forms of protest. These findings hold at the individual level in both free and nonfree societies. The authors also find some evidence that the same relationships hold at the national level. In addition, trust and postmaterialist values are shown to have complementary roles in fostering protest, whereas education is largely insignificant. Interpersonal trust, therefore, serves as both a personal and a social capital resource that fosters collective action in the form of protest.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (Eds.). (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Burgess, P.,& Lawton, R. (1972). Indicators of international behavior: An assessment of events data research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Chong, D. (1991). Collective action and the civil rights movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
7.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
8.
Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 49-72). New York: Blackwell.
9.
DeNardo, J. (1985). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Finkel, S. E., Muller, E. N., & Opp, K. D. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 885-903.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
14.
Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust in trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213-237). New York: Blackwell.
15.
Gamson, W.,& Meyer, D. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy,& M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 275-290). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 1420-1443.
17.
Guttman, L. (1945). Abasis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrica, 10(4), 255-282.
18.
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relations: Forms and facades of trust. In C. Lane & R. Bachman (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications (pp. 64-87). New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Jackman, R. W., & Miler, R. A. (1998). Social capital and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 47-73.
22.
Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57-85.
23.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583-600.
24.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.
25.
Lichbach, M. I. (1998). Contending theories of contentious politics and the structure-action problem of social order. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 401-424.
26.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Muller, E. N. (1972). Atest of a partial theory of potential for political violence. American Political Science Review, 66(3)m 928-959.
29.
Muller, E. N. (1979). Aggressive political participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567-576.
31.
Opp, K. D. (1988). Grievances and social movement participation. American Sociological Review, 53(6), 853-864.
32.
Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
33.
Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science & Politics, 28, 664-683.
34.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35.
Rochon, T. R. (1990). TheWest European peace movement and the theory of new social movements. In R. J. Dalton& M. Kuechler (Eds.), Challenging the political order: Newsocial and political movements in Western democracies (pp. 105-121). New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Rochon, T. R. (1998). Culture moves: Ideas, activism, and changing values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
38.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1996). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
WorldValues Study Group. (1994). WorldValues Survey, 1981-1984and 1990-1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Available at http://wvs.isr.umich.edu
