This article presents the first attempt to examine the political consequences of internationally funded programs that target local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Although the purported mission of NGOs is often economic, humanitarian, or environmental, the authors suggest that their impact is also profoundly political. Injections of international resources into underdeveloped, often clientelistic societies can fundamentally change the nature of the local political arena, affecting access to economic resources, social benefits, and ultimately the quality of democratic representation. The authors analyze the impact external resources have on politics by examining a series of World Bank-funded projects based in the Brazilian Amazon from 1995 to 1997. They show that World Bank funding designed to channel resources to local groups had powerful effects in the political arena, increasing electoral support for the Left in the 1998 presidential race. This article has important implications for the growing role of NGOs and their influence on politics in the developing world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abers, R. (1996). From ideas to practice: The Partido dos Trabalhadores and participatory governance in Brazil. Latin America Perspectives, 23(4), 35-54.
2.
Achen, C. (1986). The statistical analysis of quasi-experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Ames, B. (1994). The reverse coattails effect: Local party organization in the 1989 Brazilian presidential election. American Political Science Review, 88, 95-111.
4.
Ames, B. (2000). The deadlock of democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
Ames, B. , & Keck, M. (1997). Brazilian politics and environmental policy. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 39(4), 5-40.
6.
Amnesty International . (1998). Corumbiara and Eldorado de Carajas—Rural violence, police brutality and impunity. London: Author.
7.
Aparicio, T. , & Garrison, J. (1999). The challenges of promoting participatory development in the Amazon. Washington, DC: World Bank.
8.
Bebbington, A. , & Thiele, G. (Eds.). (1993). NGOs and the state in Latin America: Rethinking roles in sustainable agricultural development. London: Routledge.
9.
Becker, G. (1975). Human capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10.
Carroll, T. F. (1992). Intermediary NGOs: The supporting link in grassroots development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
11.
Clarke, G. (1998). Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and politics in the developing world. Political Studies, 46, 36-52.
12.
Edwards, M. , & Hulme, D. (Eds.). (1992). Making a difference: NGOs and development in a changing world. London: Earthscan.
13.
Edwards, M. , & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961-973.
14.
Fisher, J. (1998). Non governments: NGOs and the political development of the third world. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
15.
Fox, J. (1994). The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship. World Politics, 46(2), 151-184.
16.
Frank, A. G. , & Fuentes, M. (1990). Civil democracy: Social movements in recent world history. In S. Amin, G. Arrighi, A. Gunder-Frank, & I. Wallerstein (Eds.), Transforming the revolution: Social movements and the world system. New York: Monthly Review.
17.
Hall, A. (1997). Sustaining Amazonia: Grassroots action for productive conservation. New York: Manchester University Press.
18.
Hecht, S. , & Cockburn, A. (1990). The fate of the forest. New York: Harper Perennial.
19.
Hulme, D. , & Edwards, M. (Eds.). (1997). NGOs, states and donors. London: Macmillan.
20.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
22.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica . (1996). Contagem da População [Count of population]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Author.
23.
Korten, D. (1990). Third generation NGO strategies: A key to people-centered development. World Development, 15(suppl.), 145-159.
24.
Lehman, D. (1990). Democracy and development in Latin America: Economics, politics and religion in the post-war period. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
25.
Loveman, B. (1991). NGOs and the transition to democracy in Chile. Grassroots Development, 15(2), 8-19.
26.
Mathews, J. T. (1997). Power shift. Foreign Affairs, 76(1), 50-66.
27.
Ministry of the Environment. (2001). G7 subprojects approved in Rondonia. Unpublished internal financial report, Ministry of the Environment, Brasilia, Brazil.
28.
Nylen, W. (1997). Reconstructing the workers' party (PT): Lessons from north-eastern Brazil. In Douglas A. Chalmers, Caros M. Vilas, Katherine Hite, Scott B. Martin, Kerianne Piester, & Monique Segarra (Eds.), The new politics of inequality in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Overseas Development Institute. (1996). The impact of NGO development projects (Briefing Paper 1996[2] May). Retrieved July 18, 2001, from http:// www.odi.org.uk/briefing/2_96/html
30.
Piven, F. , & Cloward R. (1977). Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.
31.
Planafloro . (1996). Quadro demonstrativo de metas e beneficiários de Projectos de Iniciativa Communitária conveniados em 1996 [Chart of goals and beneficiaries of the Community Initiative Projects approved in 1996]. Porto Velho, Brazil: Author.
32.
Planafloro . (1997). Progama de apoio às iniciativas comunitárias PAIC: cartilha informativa [Program of support for community initiatives (PAIC): information booklet]. Porto Velho, Brazil: Rondônia, Secretaria de Estado do Plan, e Coord. Geral, Coord. Geral de Planafloro.
33.
Planafloro . (1998a). Relatário No 01 de acompanhamento da execução orçamentária/financeira dos Programas de Apoio ás Iniciativas Communitárias—PAIC's—1997 [Budget/financial execution report no. 01 of the Programs of Support for Community Initiatives—PAIC's—1997]. Porto Velho, Brazil: Author.
34.
Planafloro . (1998b). Relatário No 03 de acompanhamento da execução orçamentária/financeira dos Programas de Apoio ás Iniciativas Communitárias—PAIC's—1997 [Budget/financial execution report no. 03 of the Programs of Support for Community Initiatives—PAIC's—1997]. Porto Velho, Brazil: Author.
35.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). Returns to education: An updated international comparison. Journal of Human Resources, 20, 321-341.
36.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
Rivera, T. (1992). The new world order: Problems and prospects for the people's movement in the Philippines. In Carmencita Karagdag & Augusto Miclat (Eds.), Beyond the cold war: Philippine perspectives on the emerging world order. Quezon, the Philippines: People's Training Program for Philippine NGOs.
39.
Robinson, M. (1993). Governance, democracy, and conditionality: NGOs and the new policy agenda. In Andrew Clayton (Ed.), Governance, democracy and conditionality: What role for NGOs?Oxford, UK: The International NGO Training and Research Centre.
40.
Segarra, M. (1997). Redefining the public/private mix; NGOs and the emergency social investment fund in Ecuador. In Douglas A. Chalmers, Caros M. Vilas, Katherine Hite, Scott B. Martin, Kerianne Piester, & Monique Segarra (Eds.), The new politics of inequality in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Sethi, H. (1992). Action groups in the new politics. In Carmencita Karagdag & Augusto Miclat (Eds.), Beyond the cold war: Philippine perspectives on the emerging world order. Quezon, the Philippines: People's Training Program for Philippine NGOs.
42.
Sins of the secular missionary. 2000, January 27. The Economist.
43.
Uphoff, N. (1993). Grassroots organizations and NGOs in rural development: Opportunities with diminishing states and expanding markets. World Development, 21, 607-622.
44.
World Bank . (2000). The World Bank, NGOs and civil society. Washington, DC: Author.
