Scholars have devoted substantial research to political parties, but comparativists have not explored how presidentialism and parliamentarism differently affect party development, organization, and behavior. The parties' literature developed from explorations of European parliamentary systems, in which constitutional structure is not an independent variable, or from the U.S. case, in which the presidentialism is sometimes not related to party development. The result is a serious gap in the literature. In this article, the author argues that the institutions of presidentialism generate incentives for parties to organize and behave differently than they would otherwise under parliamentarism. The author explores the consequences for party behavior of a shift from pure parliamentarism to semipresidentialism in France in 1958 and Israel in 1992. Given the paucity of research on how the separation of powers creates “presidentialized parties,” the argument suggests scholars rethink parties' actual role in both within presidential systems as well as across democratic regime types
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beck, P. A. (1997). Party politics in America (8th ed.). New York: Longman.
2.
Beer, S. (1953). Les partis politiques. Western Political Quarterly, 6(3), 512-517.
3.
Bick, E. (1998). Sectarian party politics in Israel: The case of Yisrael Ba'Aliya, the Russian Immigrant Party. In D. Elazar & S. Sandler (Eds.), Israel at the polls (pp. 121-145). London: Frank Cass.
4.
Cole, A. (1990a). The evolution of the party system, 1974-1990. In A. Cole (Ed.), French political parties in transition (pp. 3-24). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
5.
Cole, A. (1990b). The return of the Orleanist right: The Union for French Democracy. In A. Cole (Ed.), French Political Parties in Transition (pp. 106-139). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
6.
Cole, A. (1993). The presidential party and the Fifth Republic. West European Politics, 16(2), 49-66.
7.
Cole, A. , & Campbell, P. (1989). French electoral systems and elections since 1789. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
8.
Cox, G. (1997). Making votes count. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Dix, R. (1989). Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 22(1), 23-37.
10.
Epstein, L. (1967). Political parties in Western democracies. New York: Praeger.
11.
Epstein, L. (1986). Political parties in the American mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
12.
Frears, J. (1991). Parties and voters in France. New York: St. Martin's.
13.
Gaffney, J. (1990). The emergence of a presidential party: The Socialist Party. In A. Cole (Ed.), French political parties in transition (pp. 61-90). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
14.
Goldberg, G. (1998). The electoral fall of the Israeli left. In D. Elazar & S. Sandler (Eds.), Israel at the polls 1996 (pp. 53-72). London: Frank Cass.
15.
Hazan, R. (1999). The electoral consequences of political reform. In A. Arian & M. Shamir (Eds.), The elections in Israel 1996 (pp. 163-185). Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
Hazan, R. (in press). The Israeli mixed electoral system: Unexpected reciprocal and cumulative consequences. Comparative Political Studies.
17.
Hazan, R. , & Rahat, G. (2000). Representation, electoral reform, and democracy: Theoretical and empirical lessons from the 1996 elections in Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 33(10), 1310-1336.
18.
Knapp, A. (1990). Un parti comme les autres: Jacques Chirac and the rally for the republic. In A. Cole (Ed.), French political parties in transition (pp. 140-184). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
19.
Linz, J . (1993). Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? In J. Linz & A. Valenzuela (Eds.), The failure of presidential democracy: The case of Latin America (pp. 3-87). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Lipset, S. M. , & Rokkan, S. (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press.
21.
Machin, H . (1989). Stages and dynamics in the evolution of the French party system. West European Politics, 12(4), 59-81.
22.
Mahler, G. S. (1997). The forming of the Netanyahu government: Coalition formation in a quasi-parliamentary setting. Israel Affairs, 3, 3-27.
23.
Mainwaring, S. , & Scully, T. (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
Mainwaring, S. , & Shugart, M. S. (1997). Juan Linz, presidentialism, and democracy: A critical appraisal. Comparative Politics, 29(4), 449-472.
25.
McCormick, R. P. (1979). Political development and the second party system. In W. N. Chambers & W. D. Burnham (Eds.), The American party systems: Stages of political development (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Mendilow, J. (1999). The Likud's double campaign: Between the devil and the deep blue sea. In A. Arian & M. Shamir (Eds.), The elections in Israel 1996 (pp. 187-210). Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Müller, W. , & Strøm, K. (Eds.). (2000). Policy, office, or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Northcutt, W. (1989). The 1988 French presidential election: François Mitterand's campaign strategy. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History, 16, 291-301.
29.
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Pierce, R. (1995). Choosing the chief: Presidential elections in France and the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-268.
32.
Schlesinger, J. (1991). Political parties and the winning of office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Shugart, M. , & Carey, J. (1992). Presidents and assemblies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Stellman, H. (1996). Electing a prime minister and a parliament: The Israeli election of 1996. Parliamentary Affairs, 41(4), 648-660.
35.
Stokes, S. (1999). Political parties and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 243-267.
36.
Strøm, K. (1990). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565-598.
37.
Torgovnik, E. (2000). Strategies under a new electoral system: The Labor Party in the 1996 Israeli elections. Party Politics, 6(1), 95-106.
