How political parties select their candidates for public office profoundly affects the types of people who are elected as well as how these people behave in office. This selection process also provides important insights on how parties function internally and on where political power is located within a country. Only a few comparative studies of nomination procedures exist, and none explain why some parties at some points in time select candidates via direct primaries and others do not. The authors analyze an original data set of 610 district-level nomination processes for the biennial Argentine Chamber of Deputies elections held between 1983 and 2001. They conclude that several specific institutional and partisan features have a prominent effect on the probability that a political party will choose its candidates at the ballot box (direct primary) rather than in a smoke-filled back room (elite arrangement).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carey, John M. , & Shugart, Matthew Soberg. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14, 417-439.
2.
Crotty, William J. , & Jackson, John S. (1985). Presidential primaries and nominations. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
3.
Eaton, Kent. (2000). Legislating adjustment: Politicians and economic reform in developing democracies. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
4.
Epstein, Leon D. (1980). Political parties in Western democracies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
5.
Gallagher, Michael . (1980). Candidate selection in Ireland: The impact of localism and the electoral system. British Journal of Political Science, 10, 489-503.
6.
Gallagher, Michael . (1988). Conclusion. In Michael Gallagher & Michael Marsh (Eds.), Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics (pp. 236-283). London: Sage.
7.
Gallagher, Michael , & Marsh, Michael. (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics. London: Sage.
8.
Gibson, Edward L. (1997). The populist road to market reform: Policy and electoral coalitions in Mexico and Argentina. World Politics, 49, 339-370.
9.
Gibson, Edward L. , & Calvo, Ernesto. (2000). Federalism and low-maintenance constituencies: The territorial dimension of economic reform in Argentina. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(5), 32-55.
10.
Hazan, Reuven Y. (1997). The 1996 intraparty elections in Israel: Adopting party primaries. Electoral Studies, 16, 95-103.
11.
Jewell, Malcolm E. , & Morehouse, Sarah M. (2001). Political parties and elections in American states (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
12.
Jones, Mark P. (1997). Evaluating Argentina's presidential democracy: 1983-1995. In Scott Mainwaring & Matthew Soberg Shugart (Eds.), Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America (pp. 259-299). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Jones, Mark P., Sanguinetti, Pablo, & Tommasi, Mariano. (2001). Voters as fiscal liberals. Unpublished manuscript, Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Institucional.
14.
Katz, Richard S. , & Mair, Peter. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1, 5-28.
15.
Key, V. O., Jr . (1956). American state politics: An introduction. New York: Knopf.
16.
Key, V. O., Jr . (1964). Politics, parties, and pressure groups (5th ed.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
17.
King, Gary , Tomz, Michael, & Wittenberg, Jason. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 341-355.
18.
Kristijánsson, Svanur . (1998). Electoral politics and governance: Transformation of the party system in Iceland, 1970-1996. In Paul Pennings & Jan-Erik Lane (Eds.), Comparing party system change (pp. 167-182). New York: Routledge.
19.
Levitsky, Steven . (1998). Crisis, party adaptation, and regime stability in Argentina: The case of Peronism, 1989-1995. Party Politics, 4, 445-470.
20.
Levitsky, Steven . (2001). An organized disorganization: Informal organization and the persistence of local party structures in Argentine Peronism. Journal of Latin American Studies, 33, 29-65.
21.
Luna, Félix . (1984). Perón y su tiempo [Perón and his time]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Sudamericana.
22.
Mainwaring, Scott , & Shugart, Matthew Soberg. (1997). Conclusion: Presidentialism and the party system. In Scott Mainwaring & Matthew Soberg Shugart (Eds.), Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America (pp. 394-439). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Mansilla, César . (1983). Los partidos provinciales [The provincial parties]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro Editor de América Latina.
24.
Manzetti, Luigi . (1993). Institutions, parties, and coalitions in Argentine politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
25.
Martz, John D. (1999). Political parties and candidate selection in Venezuela and Colombia. Political Science Quarterly, 114, 639-659.
26.
McGuire, James W. (1997). Peronism without Perón: Unions, parties, and democracy in Argentina. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
Obler, Jeffrey . (1974). Intraparty democracy and the selection of parliamentary candidates: The Belgian case. British Journal of Political Science, 4, 163-185.
28.
Ranney, Austin , (1981). Candidate selection. In David Butler, Howard R. Penniman, & Austin Ranney (Eds.), Democracy at the polls. A comparative study of competitive national elections (pp. 75-106). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
29.
Remmer, Karen L. , & Wibbels, Erik. (2000). The subnational politics of economic adjustment: Provincial politics and fiscal performance in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 419-451.
30.
Sartori, Giovanni . (1976). Parties and party systems. A frameworkfor analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
32.
Schlesinger, Joseph A. (1991). Political parties and the winning of office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Siavelis, Peter . (1998, September). The hidden logic of candidate selection for Chilean parliamentary elections. Paper presented at the 21st Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, IL.
34.
Spiller, Pablo T. , & Tommasi, Mariano. (2000). Las fuentes institucionales del desarrollo Argentino: Hacia una agenda institucional [The institutional origins of Argentine development: Toward an institutional agenda]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires and Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.
35.
Tula, María Inés , & De Luca, Miguel. (1999). Listas sábana, preferencias y tachas: Algunas reflexiones a propósito de la reforma electoral en la Argentina [Closed lists, preferences, and cross-outs: Some reflections for electoral reform in Argentina]. POSTData, 5, 97-146.
36.
Ware, Alan . (1996). Political parties and party systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
World Bank . (1990). Argentina: Provincial government finances. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Wu, Chung-li . (2001). The transformation of the Kuomintang's candidate selection system. Party Politics, 7, 103-118.
