To what degree can Western countries “purchase” civic engagement and participation in less developed countries that do not share the Western liberal tradition? Drawing on interview data as well as internal documents, this article looks at the effects of Western and international assistance on building civil society and, hence, democracy in Russia by focusing on the Russian nongovernmental organization (NGO) community. Although Western assistance has provided tangible equipment and training for NGOs, overall funding designed to facilitate the growth of civil society has had unintended consequences. Institutions, interests, and incentive structures impede successful collective action toward building a civic community by encouraging both funders and NGO activists to pursue short-term benefits over long-term development. The result is the creation of patron-client ties between the international donor and the Russian recipient rather than horizontal networks of civic engagement among Russian NGOs and their domestic audience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arrow, Kenneth . (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.
2.
Berman, Sheri . (1997). Civil society and political institutionalization. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 562-574.
3.
Carothers, Thomas . (1999). Aiding democracy abroad: The learning curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
4.
Chisholm, Stewart. (1997). Report to USAID. Unpublished manuscript for USAID/Russia, Moscow, Russia.
5.
Christie, Maggie. (1996). Constraints on Russia's NGO sector. Unpublished manuscript for USAID/Russia, Moscow, Russia.
6.
Clark, Anne Marie , Friedman, Elisabeth J., & Hochstetler, Kathryn. (1998). The sovereign limits of global civil society: A comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights, and women. World Politics, 51, 1-35.
7.
Diamond, Larry . (1995). Promoting democracy in the 1990s: Actors and instruments, issues and imperatives. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
8.
Diamond, Larry . (1997). Promoting democracy in the 1990s: Actors, instruments, and issues. In Axel Hadenius (Ed.), Democracy's victory and crisis (pp. 311-370). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Eisenstadt, S. N. , & Roniger, L. (1994). Patrons, clients, and friends: Interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Ford Foundation . (1998). Ford Foundation 1997 annual report. New York: Author.
11.
Goble, Paul A. (Ed.). (1999, June 2). Regions make more progress on reducing pension arrears than wage backlog [Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) Newsline]. Available from http://www.rferl.org/newsline/
12.
Hardin, Russell . (1982). Collective action. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
Hyden, Goran . (1997). Civil society, social capital, and development: Dissection of a complex discourse. Studies in Comparative International Development, 32, 3-30.
14.
Inglehart, Ronald . (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political changes in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Keck, Margaret E. , & Sikkink, Kathryn. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
Kenneth, Newton . (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 575-586.
17.
Lindemann, Sarah. (1999, May 26). Response to Paul Goble. Johnson's List, online news/discussion group, issue 3305, article 11.
18.
Linz, Juan J. , & Stepan, Alfred. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Lubin, Nancy . (1997). U.S. assistance to the newly independent states: When good things come in smaller packages. In Karen Dawisha (Ed.), The international dimension of post-Communist transitions in Russia and the new states of Eurasia (pp. 350-378). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
20.
Lumsdaine, David Halloran . (1993). Moral vision in international politics: The foreign aid regime, 1949-1989. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Melia, Thomas O. (1998, September 23). Retreats with partners [Internal memo]. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute.
22.
Mendelson, Sarah E. , & Glenn, John K. (2000). Democracy assistance and NGO strategies in post-communist societies. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
23.
North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Olson, Mancur . (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Olson, Mancur . (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Ostrom, Elinor . (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Ottaway, Marina , & Chung, Theresa. (1999). Debating democracy assistance: Toward a new paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 4, 99-113.
Polishchuk, Leonid. (1997). Russian civil society: Report for the World Bank. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector, University of Maryland, College Park.
30.
Putnam, Robert . (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Richter, James . (1998). Promoting activism or professionalism in Russia's civil society? (Program on New Approaches to Russian Security Policy Memo Series, No. 51). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Richter, James . (1999). Civil society or the third sector?Give & Take, 4, 1-4.
33.
Sharlet, Robert . (1997). Bringing the rule of law to Russia and the newly independent states: The role of the west in the transformation of the post-Soviet legal systems. In Karen Dawisha (Ed.), The international dimension of post-Communist transitions in Russia and the new states of Eurasia (pp. 322-349). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
34.
Smith, Brian H. (1990). More than altruism: The politics of private foreign aid. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Sperling, Valerie . (1998). Foreign funding of social movements in Russia (Program on New Approaches to Russian Security Policy Memo Series, No. 26). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Sperling, Valerie . (1999). Organizing women in contemporary Russia. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Taylor, Michael . (1982). Community, anarchy, and liberty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Tisch, Sarah J. , & Wallace, Michael B. (1994). Dilemmas of development assistance: The what, why, and who of foreign aid. Boulder, CO: Westview.
39.
Tocqueville, Alexis de . (1969). Democracy in America. New York: Anchor.
40.
USAID/Russia . (1998). USAID/Russia activity descriptions as of March 31, 1998. Moscow: Author.
41.
Wedel, Janine . (1998). Collision and collusion: The strange case of western aid to Eastern Europe 1989-1998. New York: St. Martin's.
42.
Whitehead, Laurence (1996). The imposition of democracy: The Caribbean. In Laurence Whitehead (Ed.), The international dimensions of democratization: Europe and the Americas (pp. 59-92). New York: Oxford University Press.
