This article argues that researchers must broaden their definition of representation if they are to expand their understanding of electoral reform. The authors use the 1996 case of inter- and intraparty electoral reform in Israel to illustrate their claim. These reforms were designed either to enhance the circle of participation or to improve governability, without damaging representation. However, the type of representation that was supposed to be maintained by the reforms was different in each case. Party primaries were supposed to preserve representation as presence, whereas direct election of the prime minister was supposed to uphold the representation of ideas. The reformers did not perceive this distinction and felt that representation (defined as proportionality) would not be affected by both reforms. The result of the 1996 elections in Israel was that both reforms damaged representation, and both missed their targets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arian, Asher , & Amir, Ruth. (1997). HaBechirot HaBaot: BeAizo Shita Nivchar? [The next elections in Israel: How should we vote?]Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute.
2.
Arian, Asher , & Shamir, Michal. (Eds.). (1999). The elections in Israel 1996. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
Aronoff, Myron J. (1993). Power and ritual in the Israel labor party: A study in political anthropology. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
4.
Bar, Aliza . (1996). “Primaries”: Bechirot Makdimot VeShitot Acherot [Primaries and other methods of candidate selection]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Ha'Kibbutz Ha'Meuchad.
5.
Birch, Anthony . (1971). Representation. New York: Praeger.
6.
Birch, Anthony . (1993). The concepts of modern democracy. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
7.
Bogdanor, Vernon . (1993). The electoral system, government, and democracy. In Larry Diamond & Ehud Sprinzak (Eds.), Israeli democracy under stress (pp. 83-106). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
8.
Diamond, Larry , & Sprinzak, Ehud. (Eds.). (1993). Israeli democracy under stress. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
9.
Diskin, Abraham , & Diskin, Hanna. (1991). Bechira Yeshira Shel Rosh HaMemshala [Changing the system of government in Israel: The direct vote for the prime minister] (Jerusalem Institute for Israeli Studies Background Papers for Policy Makers no. 5). Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israeli Studies.
10.
Diskin, Hanna , & Diskin, Abraham. (1995). The politics of electoral reform in Israel. International Political Science Review, 16, 31-46.
Doron, Gideon , & Goldberg, Giora. (1990). No big deal: Democratization of the nominating process. In Asher Arian & Michal Shamir (Eds.), The elections in Israel—1988 (pp. 155-171). Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Doron, Gideon , & Kay, Barry. (1995). Reforming Israel's voting schemes. In Asher Arian & Michal Shamir (Eds.), The elections in Israel—1992 (pp. 299-320). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
Fiorina, Morris P. (1992). Divided government. New York: Macmillan.
15.
Gallagher, Michael . (1991). Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies, 10, 33-51.
16.
Goldberg, Giora . (1980). Democracy and representation in Israeli political parties. In Asher Arian (Ed.), The elections in Israel—1977 (pp. 101-117). Jerusalem: Academic Press.
Goldberg, Giora , & Hoffman, Steven. (1983). Nominations in Israel: The politics of institutionalization. In Asher Arian (Ed.), The elections in Israel—1981 (pp. 61-87). Tel Aviv, Isarael: Ramot.
19.
Hazan, Reuven Y. (1996). Presidential parliamentarism: Direct popular election of the prime minister, Israel's new electoral and political system. Electoral Studies, 15, 21-37.
20.
Hazan, Reuven Y. (1997a). The 1996 intra-party elections in Israel: Adopting party primaries. Electoral Studies, 16, 95-103.
21.
Hazan, Reuven Y. (1997b). Executive-legislative relations in an era of accelerated reform: Reshaping government in Israel. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22, 329-350.
22.
Hazan, Reuven Y. (1999). The electoral consequences of political reform: In search of the center of the Israeli party system. In Asher Arian & Michal Shamir (Eds.), The elections in Israel 1996 (pp. 163-185). Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
Hazan, Reuven Y. , & Diskin, Abraham. (2000). The 1999 Knesset and prime minister elections in Israel. Electoral Studies, 19, 628-637.
24.
Herzog, Hanna . (1996). “HaAcherim” BaPolitica—Hashpaat Shinuy Shitat HaBechirot Al Yitsug Nashim VeAravim [The “Others” in politics—The influence of the change in the electoral system on the representation of women and Arabs]. In Gideon Doron (Ed.), HaMahapecha HaElectoralit [The electoral revolution] (pp. 123-138). Tel Aviv, Israel: Ha'Kibbutz Ha'Meuchad.
25.
Horowitz, Dan , & Lissak, Moshe. (1989). Trouble in utopia: The overburdened polity of Israel. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
Jacobson, Gary C. (1991). The politics of divided government. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27.
Korn, Dani . (Ed.). (1998). Kets HaMiflagot [The demise of parties in Israel]. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Ha'Kibbuts Ha'Meuchad.
28.
Lijphart, Arend . (1969). Consociational democracy. World Politics, 21, 207-225.
29.
Lijphart, Arend . (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
30.
Lijphart, Arend . (1985). The field of electoral systems research: A critical survey. Electoral Studies, 4, 3-14.
31.
Lijphart, Arend . (1993). Israeli democracy and democratic reform in comparative perspective. In Larry Diamond & Ehud Sprinzak (Eds.), Israeli democracy under stress (pp. 107-123). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
32.
Lijphart, Arend . (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
Loosemore, John , & Hanby, Victor J. (1971). The theoretical limits of maximum distortion: Some analytical explanations for electoral systems. British Journal of Political Science, 1, 467-477.
34.
Manin, Bernard . (1997). The principals of representative government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Nachmias, David , & Sened, Itai. (1999). The bias of pluralism: The redistributive effects of the new electoral law in Israel's 1996 election. In Asher Arian & Michal Shamir (Eds.), The elections in Israel 1996 (pp. 269-294). Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
Pennock, Roland J. (1968). Political representation: An overview. In Ronald J. Pennock & John W. Chapman (Eds.), Representation (pp. 3-27). New York: Atherton.
37.
Phillips, Anne . (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
38.
Pitkin, Hanna . (1968). Commentary: The paradox of representation. In Ronald J. Pennock & John W. Chapman (Eds.), Representation (pp. 38-42). New York: Atherton.
39.
Pitkin, Hanna . (1976). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
Putnam, Robert . (1976). Comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
Rae, Douglas W. (1971). The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
Rahat, Gideon , & Sher-Hadar, Neta. (1999a). Aich Nivcharim Chavrey HaKnesset [Intra-party selection of candidates for the Knesset list and for prime-ministerial candidacy 1995-1997]. Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute.
43.
Rahat, Gideon , & Sher-Hadar, Neta. (1999b). The 1996 party primaries and their political consequences. In Asher Arian & Michal Shamir (Eds.), The elections in Israel 1996 (pp. 241-268). Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
Riedwyl, Hans , & Steiner, Jurg. (1995). What is proportionality anyhow?Comparative Politics, 27, 357-369.
45.
Sartori, Giovanni . (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Sartori, Giovanni . (1994). Comparative constitutional engineering: An inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. New York: New York University Press.
47.
Sartori, Giovanni . (2000). The party effects of electoral systems. In Reuven Y. Hazan & Moshe Maor (Eds.), Parties, elections and cleavages: Israel in comparative and theoretical perspective (pp. 13-28). London: Frank Cass.
48.
Shamir, Michal , & Arian, Asher. (1999). Collective identity and electoral competition in Israel. American Political Science Review, 93, 265-277.
49.
Shugart, Matthew S. , & Carey, John M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Shugart, Matthew S. , & Taagepera, Rein. (1994). Plurality versus majority elections of presidents: A proposal for a “double complement rule.”Comparative Political Studies, 27, 323-348.
51.
Strom, Kaare . (1997). Rules, reasons and routines: Legislative roles in parliamentary democracies. Journal of Legislative Studies, 3, 155-174.
52.
Susser, Bernard . (1997). The direct election of the prime minister: A balance sheet. Israel Affairs, 4, 237-257.
53.
Taagepera, Rein , & Shugart, Matthew S. (1989). Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
Weiss, Shevah . (1998). 14,729 Kolot Chaserim: Tamtsit Nituach Totsaot HaBechirot LaKnesset HaArba Esrei VeLeRashut HaMemshala [14,729 missing votes: An analysis of the 1996 elections in Israel]. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Ha'Kibbutz Ha'Meuchad.
