Scholars have long recognized the importance of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as an active court and an engine of European integration. Few, however, have peered inside the black box of the institution to look at the individuals who do the work or to analyze the ECJ as an organization. Law clerks at the ECJ, called référendaires, are drawn from the ranks of lawyers, legal academics, legal administrators, and judges. They provide valuable legal and linguistic expertise, ease the workload of their members, participate in oral and written interactions between cabinets, and provide continuity as members rapidly change. Although they have more power than their counterparts in the United States Supreme Court, they are not the puppeteers of the members, but their agents. Focusing on the purported unchecked power of clerks distracts us from examining the important institutional consequences of changes in workload or an expansion of members.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, J. B. (1980). Should a clerk ever reveal confidential information?Judicature, 63, 361-404.
2.
Adler, R. (1979, December 16). The justices and the journalists. New York Times Book Review, 1, 24.
3.
Alchian, A. , & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information cost, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
4.
Alter, K. (1998). Explaining national court acceptance of European Court jurisprudence: A critical evaluation of theories of legal integration. In A. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet, & J. Weiler (Eds.), The European court and national courts doctrine and jurisprudence: Legal change in its social context (pp. 227-252). Oxford, UK: Hart.
5.
Ashman, A. (1980). The Court's latest portrait: Overexposed, underdeveloped. Judicature, 63, 346-348.
6.
Armstrong, K. A. (1998). New institutionalism and European Union legal studies. In P. Craig & C. Harlow (Eds.), Lawmaking in the European Union (pp. 89-110). London: Kluwer Law International.
7.
Baum, L. (1993). Case selection and decisionmaking in the U.S. Supreme Court. Law & Society Review, 27, 443-459.
8.
Bendor, J. , Taylor, S., & Gaalen, R. V. (1987). Stacking the deck: Bureaucratic mission and policy design. American Political Science Review, 81, 873-896.
9.
Bickel, A. M. (1958, April 17). The Court: An indictment analyzed. New York Times Magazine, p. 16.
10.
Brenner, S. (1992). The memos of Supreme Court law clerk William Rehnquist: Conservative tracts or mirrors of his Justice's mind?Judicature, 76, 77-81.
11.
Brenner, S. , & Palmer, J. (1990). The law clerks' recommendations and Chief Justice Vinson's vote on certiorari. American Politics Quarterly, 18, 68-80.
12.
Brigham, J. (1987). The cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13.
The bright young men behind the bench. (1957, July 12). U.S. News & World Report, 45-48.
14.
Brown, L. N. (1989). The Court of Justice of the European Communities (3rd ed). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
15.
Brown, M. R. (1996). Gender discrimination in the Supreme Court's clerkship selection process. Oregon Law Review, 75, 359-388.
16.
Burgess, S. (1993). Beyond instrumental politics: The new institutionalism, legal rhetoric, and judicial supremacy. Polity, 25, 445-459.
17.
Burley, A. , & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the Court: A political theory of legal integration. International Organization, 47, 41-76.
18.
Bzdera, A. (1992). The Court of Justice of the European Community and the politics of institutional reform. Judicial Politics and Policy-Making in Western Europe, 15, 123-136.
19.
Caldeira, G. A. (1992). Review of Deciding to Decide. Law & Politics Book Review, 2, 78-82.
20.
Caldeira, G. A. , & Gibson, J. L. (1995). The legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Community: Models of institutional support. American Political Science Review, 89, 356-376.
21.
Cappelletti, M. (1987). Is the European Court of Justice “running wild”?European Law Review, 12, 3-17.
22.
Chen, J. (1994). The mystery and the mastery of the judicial power. Missouri Law Review, 59, 281-306.
23.
Coffin, F. M. (1985). Reflections from the appellate bench: Deciding appeals, work cycle, and collaborating with law clerks. In M. W. Cannon & D. M. O'Brien (Eds.), Views from the bench: The judiciary and constitutional politics (pp. 55-63). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
24.
Cook, B. J. (1989). Principal-agent models of political control. American Political Science Review, 83, 965-978.
25.
Court of Justice of the European Communities . (1975). Formal sittings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, 1974 and 1975. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
26.
Court of Justice of the European Communities . (1991). Formal sittings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, 1990. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
27.
Crump, D. (1986a). How judges use their law clerks. New York State Bar Journal, 58, 43-48.
28.
Crump, D. (1986b). Law clerks: Their roles and relationships with their judges. Judicature, 69, 236-240.
29.
Douglas, W. O. (1980). The Court years, 1939-75. New York: Random House.
30.
Drewry, G. (1991). British law journals as a resource for political studies. Political Studies, 39, 560-567.
31.
Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. In R. Posner & K. Scott (Eds.), Economics of corporation law and securities regulation (pp. 56-66). Boston: Little, Brown.
32.
Feld, W. (1963). The judges of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Villanova Law Review, 91, 37-58.
33.
Garrett, G. (1995). The politics of legal integration in the European Union. International Organization, 49, 171-181.
34.
Gibson, J. L. , & Caldeira, G. A. (1995). The legitimacy of transnational legal institutions: Compliance, support, and the European Court of Justice. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 459-489.
35.
Gibson, J. L. , & Caldeira, G. A. (1996). The legal cultures of Europe. Law & Society Review, 30, 55-85.
36.
Hartley, T. C. (1988). The foundations of European Community law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
37.
Helm, S. (1996, Oct. 28). Britania faces her judges. The Independent, p. 14.
38.
Johnson, C. A. (1990). Strategies for judicial research: Soaking and poking in the judiciary. Judicature, 73, 192-193.
39.
Kennedy, T. (1993). First steps towards a European certiorari?European Law Review, 18, 121-137.
40.
Kennedy, T. (1996). Thirteen Russians! The composition of the European Court of Justice. In A. Campbell & M. Voyatzi (Eds.), Legal reasoning and judicial interpretation of European Law: Essays in honor of Lord Mackenzie Stuart (pp. 69-91). Gosport, UK: Ashford Colour Press.
41.
Kenney, S. J. (1998a). The European Court of Justice: Integrating Europe through law. Judicature, 81, 250-255.
42.
Kenney, S. J. (1998b). The members of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Columbia Journal of European Law, 5, 101-133.
43.
Kenney, S. J. (1999). The judges of the European Court of Justice. In S. J. Kenney, W. Reisinger, & J. Reitz (Eds.), Constitutional dialogues in comparative perspective (pp. 143-171). London: Macmillan.
44.
Kenney, S. J. (2000). Puppeteers or agents? What Lazarus's closed chambers adds to our understanding of law clerks at the U.S. Supreme Court. Law & Social Inquiry, 25(1), 185-226.
45.
Kester, J. (1983). The law clerk explosion. Litigator, 9, 20-24.
46.
Kilroy, B. (1995, August 31). Member state control or judicial independence: The integrative role of the European Court of Justice, 1958-1994. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
47.
Koopmans, T. (1986). The role of law in the next stage of European integration. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35, 925-931.
48.
Kozinski, A. (1991). Confessions of a bad apple. Yale Law Journal, 100, 1707-1730.
49.
Krasner, S. D. (1972). Are bureaucracies important? (Or Allison Wonderland). Foreign Policy, 7, 159-179.
50.
Krislov, S. , Ehlermann, C., & Weiler, J. (1986). The political organs and the decision-making process in the United States and the European Community. In M. Cappelletti, M. Seccombe, & J. Weiler (Eds.), Integration through law (pp. 3-110). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
51.
The law clerk's duty of confidentiality . (1981). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 129, 1230-1266.
52.
Lazarus, E. (1998). Closed chambers: The first eyewitness account of the epic struggles inside the Supreme Court. New York: Times Books.
53.
Lenaerts, K. (1990). Constitutionalism and the many faces of federalism. American Journal of Comparative Law, 38, 205-263.
54.
Mahoney, J. D. (1988). Law clerks: for better or for worse?Brooklyn Law Review, 54, 321-345.
55.
Mancini, G. F. (1989). The making of a constitution for Europe. Common Market Law Review, 26, 595-614.
56.
Mancini, G. F. , & Keeling, D. T. (1994). Democracy and the European Court of Justice. Modern Law Review, 57, 175-190.
57.
March, J. G. , & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734-749.
58.
McCree, W. H., Jr. (1981). Bureaucratic justice: An early warning. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 129, 777-797.
59.
Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 739-777.
60.
Moe, T. M. (1987). An assessment of the positive theory of “Congressional dominance.”Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10, 475-520.
61.
Newland, C. A. (1961). Personal assistants to Supreme Court justices: The law clerks. Oregon Law Review, 40, 299-317.
62.
Oakley, J. B. , & Thompson, R. S. (1980). Law clerks and the judicial process: Perceptions of the qualities and function of law clerks in American courts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
O'Brien, D. M. (1993). Storm center: The Supreme Court in American politics (3rd ed.). New York: Norton.
64.
O'Connor, K. , & Hermann, J. R. (1993, April). The clerk connection: A history and analysis of clerk participation before the U.S. Supreme Court. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
65.
O'Connor, K. , & Hermann, J. R. (1995). The clerk connection: Appearances before the Supreme Court and former law clerks. Judicature, 78, 247-249.
66.
Perry, H. W. (1990). Interviewing Supreme Court personnel. Judicature, 73, 199-200.
67.
Perry, H. W. (1991). Deciding to decide: Agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
Pollack, M. (1998). The engines of integration? Supranational autonomy and influence in the European Union. In W. Sandholtz & A. S. Sweet (Eds.), European integration and Supranationa governance (pp. 217-249). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
69.
Posner, R. A. (1985). The federal courts: Crisis and reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70.
Posner, R. A. (1995). Overcoming law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
Pratt, J. W. , & Zeckhauser, R. J. (Eds.). (1985). Principals and agents: The structure of business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
72.
Rasmussen, H. (1986). On law and policy in the European Court of Justice: A comparative study in judicial policymaking. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
73.
Rasmussen, H. (1988). Between self-restraint and activism: A judicial policy for the European Court. European Law Review, 13, 28-38.
74.
Rehnquist, W. H. (1957, December 13). Who writes decisions of the Supreme Court?U.S. News & World Report, 74-75.
75.
Rehnquist, W. H. (1987). The Supreme Court: How it was, how it is. New York: William Morrow.
76.
Rhinehart, L. K. (1994). Is there gender bias in the judicial law clerk selection process?Georgetown Law Journal, 83, 575-603.
77.
Rogers, W. (1958, February 21). Clerks' work is not decisive of ultimate result. U.S. News & World Report, 114-116.
78.
Rudden, B. (1987). Basic Community cases. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
79.
Sandalow, T. , & Stein, E. (Eds.). (1982). Courts and free markets: Perspectives from the United States and Europe. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
80.
Sandholtz, W. , & Sweet, A. S. (Eds). (1998). European integration and supranational governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81.
Scheingold, S. A. (1965). The rule of law in European integration: The path of the Schuman Plan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82.
Shapiro, M. (1987). Review of Rasmussen's On law and policy in the European Court of Justice. American Journal of International Law, 81, 1008-1009.
83.
Shapiro, M. , & Stone, A. (1994). The new constitutional politics of Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 26, 397-420.
84.
Shapiro, M., & Stone, A. (Eds). (1994). The new constitutional politics of Europe [Special issue]. Comparative Political Studies, 26(4).
85.
Smith, G. (1990). The European Court of Justice: Judges or policy makers?London: Bruge.
86.
Smith, R. (1988). Political jurisprudence, The “new institutionalism” and the future of public law. American Political Science Review, 82, 89-108.
87.
Stein, E. (1981). Lawyers, judges and the making of a transnational constitution. American Journal of International Law, 75, 1-27.
88.
Stern, R. , Gressman, E., & Shapiro, S. (1986). Supreme Court practice (6th ed). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
89.
Stone, A. (1992). The birth of judicial politics in France: The Constitutional Council in comparative perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
90.
Stone, A. S. (1995). Governing with judges: The new constitutionalism in Europe. In J. Hayward & E. C. Page (Eds.), Governing the new Europe. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
91.
Stow, M. L. , & Spaeth, H. J. (1992). Centralized research staff: Is there a monster in the judicial closet?Judicature, 75, 216-221.
92.
Sturley, M. F. (1992). Cert pool. In K. Hall (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (p. 133). New York: Oxford University Press.
93.
Swann, M. (1992). Clerks of the justices. In K. Hall (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (pp. 159-161). New York: Oxford University Press.
94.
Sweet, A. S. , & Brunell, T. L. (1998). Constructing a supranational constitution: Dispute resolution and governance in the European Community. American Political Science Review, 92, 63-82.
95.
Sweet, A. S. , & Caporaso, J. A. (1998). From free trade to supranational polity: The European Court and integration. In W. Sandholtz & A. S. Sweet (Eds.), European integration and supranational governance (pp. 92-133). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
96.
Tate, C. N. (1987). Judicial institutions in cross-national perspective: Toward integrating courts into the comparative study of politics. In J. R. Schmidhauser (Ed.), Comparative judicial systems (pp. 7-33). Boston: Butterworths.
97.
University of Chicago Legal Forum . (1992). Europe and America in 1992 and beyond: Common problems... common solutions?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98.
Volcansek, M. L. (1986). Judicial politics in Europe. New York: Peter Lang.
99.
Volcansek, M. L. (1992). The European Court of Justice: Supranational policy-making. Western European Politics, 15, 109-121.
100.
Wald, P. M. (1990). Selecting law clerks. Michigan Law Review, 89, 152-163.
101.
Wasby, S. L. (1984). The Supreme Court in the federal judicial system. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
102.
Weiden, D. (1998, June). The new institutionalism and the Supreme Court law clerk: Notes for a theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Aspen, Colorado.
103.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1986). Eurocracy and distrust: Some questions concerning the role of the European Court of Justice in the protection of fundamental human rights within the legal order of the European Communities. Washington Law Review, 61, 1103-1142.
104.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
105.
Wood, B. D. (1989). Principal-agent models of political control of bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 83, 965-978.
106.
Woodward, B. , & Armstrong, S. (1981). The brethren: Inside the Supreme Court. New York: Avon.
