Through the examination of one of the most successful cases of a European Community (EC) law litigation strategy, this article develops a general framework for understanding when and how the EC legal system will be successfully used by domestic groups to challenge national policy. The authors show how the European legal system actually shifted the domestic balance of power in favor of equality actors, allowing a previously weak domestic group to influence the United Kingdom's gender equality policy at the height of Conservative Party rule. Expanding beyond the British case, the article develops a series of hypotheses about when the EC legal tool is likely to be used by groups to influence national policy, hypotheses that could account for cross-national variation in the impact of European Court of Justice jurisprudence on domestic policy in areas outside of equality policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alter, K. J. (1998a). Explaining national court acceptance of European court jurisprudence: A critical evaluation of theories of legal integration. In A.-M. Slaughter, A. Stone-Sweet, & J. Weiler (Eds.), The European courts and national courts (pp. 225-250). Oxford, UK: Hart.
2.
Alter, K. J. (1998b). Who are the masters of the treaty?: European governments and the European court of justice. International Organization, 52(1), 125-152.
3.
Alter, K. J. (in press). The European legal system and domestic policy: Spillover or backlash?International Organization.
4.
Alter, K. J. , & Meunier-Aitsahalia, S. (1994). Judicial politics in the European Community: European integration and the pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon decision. Comparative Political Studies, 24(4), 535-561.
5.
Barnard, C. (1995). A European litigation strategy: The case of the equal opportunities commission. In J. Shaw & G. More (Eds.), New legal dynamics of European Union (pp. 254-272). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
6.
Bassett, P. (1996, May 15). Penalties rising for bias at work. Times of London.
7.
Blom, J. , Fitzpatrick, B., Gregory, J., Knegt, R., & O'Hare, U. (1995). The utilisation of sex equality litigation procedures in the member states of the European community, a comparative study. Report given by the Commission of the European Union, DG V.
8.
Bourn, C. , & Whitmore, J. (1997). Anti-discrimination law in Britain (3rd ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell.
9.
Brown, K. (1995, February 2). Government to demand curb on European Court. Financial Times, p. 9.
10.
Burley, A.-M. , & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the court. International Organization, 47(1), 41-76.
11.
Caporaso, J. , & Jupille, J. (in press). The Europeanization of social policy and domestic structural change. In M. Green Cowles, J. Caporaso, & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
Carter, A. (1988). The politics of women's rights. London: Longman Group.
13.
Conant, L. (1998). Contained justice: The politics behind Europe's rule of law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
14.
Costa v. ENEL, E.C.R. 585 ECJ (1964).
15.
Craig, P. (1998). Report on the United Kingdom. In A.-M. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet, & J. Weiler (Eds.), The European courts and national courts (pp. 195-226). Oxford, UK: Hart.
16.
Defrenne v. Sabena, I.C.R. 547 (1976).
17.
Defrenne v. Société Anonyme Belge de Navigation Aérienne Sabena, E.C.R. 1365 ECJ (1978).
18.
Dekker v. Stichting Vormingcentrum voor Jonge Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum Plus), I.R.L.R. 27 ECJ (1991).
19.
Drake v. Chief Adjudication Officer, Case 150/85, 3 All ER 65 (1985).
20.
Duke v. GEC Reliance, I.R.L.R. 118 HL (1988).
21.
Dyer, C. (1995, October 6). “Hijacked” tribunal. Guardian, p. 8.
22.
Ellis, E. (1988). Sex discrimination law. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
23.
Ellis, E. (1991). European community sex discrimination law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
24.
Fitzpatrick, B. , Gregory, J., & Szyszczak, E. (1993). Sex equality litigation in the member states of the European Community, a comparative study (V/407/94). Report given by the Commission of the European Union, DG V.
25.
Foster, P. (1996, April 26). Director wins £140,000. Times of London.
26.
Golub, J. (1996). The politics of judicial discretion: Rethinking the interaction between national courts and the European court of justice. West European Politics, 2, 360-385.
27.
Gormley, L. (1986). The application of community law in the United Kingdom, 1976-1985. Common Market Law Review, 23, 287-323.
28.
Gregory, J. (1987). Sex, race and the law: Legislating for equality. London: Sage.
29.
Harlow, C. (1992, May). A community of interests? Making the most of European law. Modern Law Review, 55, 331-351.
30.
Harlow, C. , & Rawlings, R. (1992). Pressure through law. London: Routledge.
31.
Hayes v. Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute, I.R.L.R. 367 EAT (1985).
32.
Holland, D. (1994). Women and equalities (Memorandum 940252). Transport and General Workers Union.
33.
Horowitz, D. (1977). Courts and social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
34.
Kahn, P. (1985). Unequal opportunities: Women, employment and the law. In S. Edwards (Ed.), Gender, sex and the law (pp. 79-101). London: Croom Helm.
35.
Kalanke v. Frei Hansestadt Bremen, ECJ case c450/95 (October 17, 1995).
36.
Kenney, S. J. (1992). For whose protection?: Reproductive hazards and exclusionary policies in the United States and Britain. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Kilpatrick, C. (1992). Effective utilisation of equality rights. In F. Gardiner (Ed.), Sex equality policy in Western Europe (pp. 25-45). New York: Routledge.
38.
Leonard, A. M. (1987). Judging inequality. London: Cobden Trust.
39.
Lester Q. C. , A. (1994, Summer). Discrimination: What can lawyers learn from history. Public Law, 224-237.
40.
Lovenduski, J. (1986). Women and European politics: Contemporary feminism and public policy. Sussex, UK: Harvester.
41.
Lovenduski, J. , & Randall, V. (1993). Contemporary feminist politics: Women and power in Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
Marsh, D. (1992). The new politics of British trade unionism: Union power and the Thatcher legacy. London: Macmillan.
43.
Marshall v. Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching), I.C.R. 335 ECJ (1986).
44.
Marshall v. Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (No. 2), E.C.R. (1993).
45.
Mattli, W. , & Slaughter, A.-M. (1998). Revisiting the European court of justice. International Organization, 177-209.
46.
Mazey, S. (1995, Winter). The development of EU equality policies: Bureaucratic expansion on behalf of women?Public Administration, 73, 591-609.
47.
Mazey, S. (1998). The European Union and women's rights: From the Europeanization of national agendas to the nationalization of a European agenda?Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 131-152.
48.
McCann, M. W. (1994). Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
McCrudden, C. (1987). Women, employment and European equality law: Some tentative conclusions and issues for the future. In C. McCrudden (Ed.), Women, employment and European equality law (pp. 178-187). London: Eclipse.
50.
McIlroy, J. (1991). The permanent revolution? Conservative law and the trade unions. Nottingham, UK: Spokesman.
51.
Meehan, E. , & Collins, E. (1996). Women, the European Union and Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 49(1), 221-234.
52.
Meehan, E. M. (1985). Women's rights at work: Campaigns and policy in Britain and the United States. New York: St. Martin's.
53.
Morris, A. E. , & Nott, S. M. (1991). Working women and the law: Equality and discrimination in theory and practice. London: Routledge/Sweet & Maxwell.
54.
O'Donovan, K. , & Szyszczak, E. (1988). Equality and sex discrimination law. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
55.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
56.
Olson, S. M. (1981). The political evolution of interest group litigation. In R.A.L. Gambitta, M. L. May, & J. C. Foster (Eds.), Governing through courts (pp. 225-258). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57.
Pannick, D. (1985). Sex discrimination law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
58.
Prescal, S. , & Burrows, N. (1990). Gender discrimination law in the European community. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
59.
Rasmussen, H. (1986). On law and public policy in the European court of justice. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
60.
Regina v. Secretary of State for Employment ex parte EOC and Another, I.R.L.R. 178 HL (1994).
61.
Rosenberg, G. (1991). The hollow hope. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Rubenstein, M. (1991). Beyond the whinge. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 254-263.
63.
Sacks, V. (1986). The equal opportunities commission—ten years on. Modern Law Review, 49, 560-592.
64.
Scharpf, F. (1988, Fall). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66, 239-278.
65.
Schepel, H. (1998). The mobilisation of European community law. Unpublished manuscript.
66.
Shaw, J. (1994). European Union legal studies in crisis? Towards a new dynamic. EUI Working Papers, RSC 95/23.
67.
Smith, G. (1990). The European court of justice: Judges or policy makers?London: The Bruge Group.
68.
Stone, A. , & Brunell, T. (1998). The European court and the national courts: A statistical analysis of preliminary references, 1961-95. Journal of Public European Policy, 5(1).
69.
Stone Sweet, A. (1999). Judicialization and the construction of governance. Comparative Political Studies, 32(2): 147-184.
70.
Stone Sweet, A. , & Brunell, T. (1998). Constructing a supranational constitution: Dispute resolution and governance in the European community. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 63-80.
71.
Streek, W. (1995). From market making to state building? Reflections of the political economy of European social policy. In P. Pierson & S. Leibfried (Eds.), European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration (pp. 389-431). Washington, DC: Brookings.
72.
Szyszczak, E. (1997). Remedies in sex discrimination cases. In J. Lonberg & A. Biondi (Eds.), Remedies for breach of EC law (pp. 105-115). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
73.
Taylor, R. (1996, June 1). Forced birth of a flexible employer. Financial Times, p. 7.
74.
Trade Union Congress . (1991). Using European equality legislation. Paper presented at the European Equality Legislation Seminar, Congress House, London.
75.
Vargas, J. (1995). Shifting the balance of power between domestic groups: The European court and British equal treatment policy. Honor's thesis for a Bachelor of Arts degree, Harvard University.
76.
Vogel-Polsky, E. (1985). National institutional and non-institutional machinery established in the Council of Europe Member States to promote equality between women and men. Report from the Council of Europe, Committee for Equality Between Men and Women.
77.
Webb v. EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd., I.R.L.R. 124 EAT (1990).
