1. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1975;56:610-611.
2.
2. Task Force on Circumcision. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1989;84:388-391.
3.
3. Wisell T, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics. 1985;75:901-903.
4.
4. Kaplan GW. Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin North Am. 1983; 10:543-549.
5.
5. Johnsonbaugh RE. Complication of a circumcision performed with a plastic disposable circumcision device: longterm follow-up. Am J Dis Child. 1979; 133:438-438.
6.
6. Rubenstein MM, Bason WM. Complication of circumcision done with a plastic bell clamp. Am JDis Child. 1968; 116:381-382.
7.
7. Malo T. Hazards of plastic bell circumcisions. Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 33:869-869.
8.
8. Al-Samarrai AYI, Mofti AB, Crankson SJ, et al. A review of a Plastibell' device in 2,000 instances. Surg Cynecol Obstet. 1988;167:341-343.
9.
9. Datta NS, Zinner NR. Complication from PlastibellO circumcision ring. Urology. 1977;9:57-58.
10.
10. Millar AJW, Roberts D. Complications of circumcision using the Plastibell' device. South Am Medj1987;72:438-438.
11.
11. Fraser IA, Allen MJ, Bagshaw PFJohnstone M. A randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell O device compared to a conventional dissection technique. Br J Surg. 1981;68:593-595.
12.
12. Gee WF, Ansell JS. Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the Gomco O clamp and the Plastibellim device. Pediatrics. 1976; 58:824-827.
