Assessing Parental Utilization of the Poison Center: An Emergency Center-Based Survey

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize caretakers who fail to utilize the poison center for unintentional poisonings involving children. We interviewed 210 caretakers of children evaluated for unintentional poisoning in the emergency center of an urban, universitybased teaching hospital to determine (1) whether demographic differences exist between those caretakers who contacted a poison center prior to the emergency center visit and those who did not and (2) whether differences exist in prevalence of poison prevention knowledge and behaviors between the two groups. Ninety-six (46%) of caretakers did not contact the poison center prior to the emergency center visit. Significant differences were found between the two groups for the following caretaker variables: race/ethnicity, language preference, age, level of education, country in which schooling occurred, and type of insurance coverage for the child. When logistic regression was used to control for confounding, the two variables associated with failure to use the poison center were black race and schooled outside the United States (primarily in Mexico). Poison center callers reported a higher prevalence of poison prevention knowledge and behaviors than noncallers. Educational interventions should be targeted to the groups of caretakers identified who do not use the poison center.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Litovitz TL , Felbert L , Soloway RA , et al. 1994 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillence System. Am JEmerg Med. 1995;13:551-597.

2. Chafee-Bahamon C , Lovejoy FH . Effectiveness of a regional poison center in reducing excess emergency room visits for children's poisonings. Pediatrics. 1983;72:164-169.

3. Yamamoto LG , Wiebe RA , Matthews WJ . Toxic exposures and ingestions in Honolulu: I. A prospective pediatric ED cohort; II. A prospective poison center cohort. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1991;7:141-148.

4. King WD , Palmisano PA . Poison control centers: can their value be measured? South Medj. 1991;84:722-726.

5. Litovitz TL , Kearney TE , Holm KC , et al. Poison control centers: is there an antidote for budget cuts? Am J Emerg Med. 1994;2:585-599.

6. Malloy MH , Rhodes GG . Syrup of ipecac: the case for distribution from physicians' offices. Am J Dis Child. 1988;142:640-642.

7. Rosner B . Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 3rd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company; 1990.

8. Hosmer DW , Lemeshow S . Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1989.

9. King WD , Palmisano PA . Ingestion of prescription drugs by children: an epidemiologic study. South Med J. 1989;82:1468-1472.

10.

10. Litovitz T , Manoguerra A . Comparison of pediatric poisoning hazards: an analysis of 3.8 million exposure incidents. A report from the American Association of Poison Control Centers. Pediatrics. 1992;89:999-1006.

11.

11. Kelly NR. Who utilizes a poison control center for ingestions in children? M.P.H. thesis, University of Texas Houston Health Science Center, 1994.