The techniques for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are described. Indications are given for the two procedures as well as the rationale for selection of one or the other in evaluation of the pediatric central nervous system. The benefits derived from each one are illustrated by a series of representative reproductions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Villafana T. Physics and instrumentation: CT and MRI. In: Lee SH, Rao KC, eds. Cranial computed tomography and MRI. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987:1-69.
2.
Brant-Zawadski M., Davis PL, Crooks LE, et al. NMR demonstration of cerebral abnormalities: comparison with CT. AJR1983;140:847-54.
3.
Deck MD, Henschke C., Lee BC, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: a collaborative interinstitutional study. Clin Imaging1989;13:2-15.
4.
Zimmerman RA , Bilaniuk LT, Hackney DB, et al. Head injury: early results of comparing CT and high-field MR. AJNR1986;7:757-64.
5.
Kangerloo H. , Dietrich RB, Taira RT, et al. MR imaging of bone marrow in children . J Comput Assist Tomogr1986;10:205-9.
6.
Vogler JB III, Murphy RABone marrow imaging. Radiology1988 ;168:679-93.
7.
Atlas SW, Grossman RI, Hackney DB, et al. Calcified intracranial lesions: detection with gradient echo acquisition rapid MR imaging. AJNR1988;9:253-59.
8.
Dooms GC, Uske A., Brant-Zawadski M., et al.Spin-echo MR imaging of intracranial hemorrhage. Neuroradiology1986;28:132-7.
9.
Gomori JM, Grossman RI, Goldberg HI, et al. Intracranial hematomas: imaging by high-field MR. Radiology1985;57:87-93.
10.
Axel L.Blood flow effects in magnetic resonance imaging. AJR1984;143:1157-66.
11.
Fram EK, Dimick R., Hedlund LW, et al. Parameters determining the signal of flowing fluid in gradient refocused MR imaging: flow velocity, TR and flip angle. Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Book of Abstracts. Fifth Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, August 1986 , pp 84-85.
12.
Barkovich AJ , Kjos BO, Jackson DE, et al. Normal maturation of the neonatal infant brain: MR imaging at 1.5T. Radiology1988;166:173-80.
13.
Nowell MA, Grossman RI, Hackney DB, et al. MR imaging of white matter disease in children. AJNR1988;9:503-9.
14.
Byrd SE, Naidich TPCommon congenital brain anomalies. Radiol Clin North Am1988;26:755-72.
15.
Zimmerman RA , Bilaniuk LTImaging of tumors of the spinal canal and cord. Radiol Clin North Am1988;26:965-1007.
16.
Whelan MA, Hilal SKCT as a guide in the diagnosis and follow-up of brain abscesses. Radiology1980;135:663-71.
17.
Wing SD, Norman D., Pollock JA, et al. Contrast enhancement of cerebral infarcts in computed tomography . Radiology1976;121:89-92.
18.
Powers TA, Partain CL, Kessler RM, et al. Central nervous system lesions in pediatric patients: Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology1988;169:723-6.
19.
Elster AD, Rieser GDGd-DTPA-enhanced cranial MR imaging in children: initial clinical experience and recommendations for its use. AJNR1989 ;10:1027-30.
20.
Bird CR, Drayer BP, Medina M., et al. Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging in pediatric patients after brain tumor resection. Radiology1988;169:123-6.
21.
Healy ME, Hesselink JR, Press GA, et al. Increased detection of intracranial metastases with intravenous Gd-DTPA. Radiology1987;165:619-24.
22.
Bryan RNNeurological clinical experience with Gd-DTPA. Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Book of Abstracts. Eighth Annual Meeting, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, August 1989, p. 340.
23.
Sze G., Soletsky S., Broner R., et al.MR imaging of the cranial meninges with emphasis on contrast enhancement and meningeal carcinomatosis. AJNR1989;10:965-75.
