Objective. This study assessed safety culture and staff communication with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) to identify system-level approaches to increasing interpreter use and reducing health care disparities. Methods. An electronic survey and 7 focus groups were conducted with health care professionals in pediatrics and obstetrics/gynecology. Survey data were examined with univariate descriptive analysis. Focus group transcripts were coded through an iterative consensus process. Results. Survey participants (n = 68) reported less confidence in their ability to communicate effectively (74%) and form therapeutic relationships (56%) with LEP patients versus English-proficient patients. Focus groups identified knowledge as a facilitator of interpreter use. Workflow constraints, supply-demand mismatch, variable interpretation quality, and gaps in communication with interpretation services management were barriers. Conclusion. Knowledge gaps may not be a primary cause of interpreter underuse. Strategies to address workflow barriers and engage with interpretation services are critical to move from knowledge to action to improve LEP patient care.
DiviCKossRGSchmaltzSPLoebJM. Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: a pilot study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:60-67.
3.
HampersLCMcNultyJE. Professional interpreters and bilingual physicians in a pediatric emergency department: effect on resource utilization. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1108-1113.
4.
NgaiKMGrudzenCRLeeRTongVYRichardsonLDFernandezA. The association between limited english proficiency and unplanned emergency department revisit within 72 hours. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;68:213-221.
5.
WilburMBMannschreckDBAngaritaAM, et al. Unplanned 30-day hospital readmission as a quality measure in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143:604-610.
6.
SteinbergEMValenzuela-AraujoDZickafooseJSKiefferEDeCampLR. The “battle” of managing language barriers in health care. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016;55:1318-1327. doi:10.1177/0009922816629760
7.
LindholmMHargravesJLFergusonWJReedG. Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1294-1299.
8.
KarlinerLSPérez-StableEJGregorichSE. Convenient access to professional interpreters in the hospital decreases readmission rates and estimated hospital expenditures for patients with limited English proficiency. Med Care. 2017;55:199-206.
9.
FloresGLawsMBMayoSJ, et al. Errors in medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences in pediatric encounters. Pediatrics. 2003;111:6-14.
10.
KuLFloresG. Pay now or pay later: providing interpreter services in health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:435-444.
11.
BetancourtJRRenfrewMRGreenARLopezLWassermanM. Improving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Guide for Hospitals. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
12.
GutmanCKCousinsLGrittonJ, et al. Professional interpreter use and discharge communication in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Pediatr. 2018;18:935-943. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2018.07.004
13.
National Committee for Quality Assurance. A practical guide to implementing the National CLAS Standards: for racial, ethnic and linguistic minorities, people with disabilities and sexual and gender minorities. https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/OMH/Downloads/CLAS-Toolkit-12-7-16.pdf. Published December 2016. Accessed August 13, 2018.
14.
DiamondLCWilson-StronksAJacobsEA. Do hospitals measure up to the national culturally and linguistically appropriate services standards?Med Care. 2010;48:1080-1087.
15.
LópezLRodriguezFHuertaDSoukupJHicksL. Use of interpreters by physicians for hospitalized limited English proficient patients and its impact on patient outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:783-789.
16.
DeCampLRKuoDZFloresGO’ConnorKMinkovitzCS. Changes in language services use by US pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e396-e406.
17.
DiamondLCSchenkerYCurryLBradleyEHFernandezA. Getting by: underuse of interpreters by resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:256-262. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0875-7
18.
EvansYNRaftonSAMichelEEbelBE. Provider language proficiency and decision-making when caring for limited English proficiency children and families. J Natl Med Assoc. 2018;110:212-218. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2017.06.002
19.
HernandezRGCowdenJDMoonMBrandsCKSissonSDThompsonDA. Predictors of resident satisfaction in caring for limited English proficient families: a multisite study. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14:173-180. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2013.12.002
20.
KenisonTCMaduAKrupatETiconaLVargasIMGreenAR. Through the veil of language: exploring the hidden curriculum for the care of patients with limited English proficiency. Acad Med. 2017;92:92-100. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001211
Dedoose [computer software]. Version 8.0.35, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC; 2018. www.dedoose.com. Accessed January 2, 2020.
26.
PattonM. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
27.
BarbourRS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?BMJ. 2001;322:1115-1117.
28.
DiamondLCTuotDSKarlinerLS. The use of Spanish language skills by physicians and nurses: policy implications for teaching and testing. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:117-123.
29.
DiamondLCJacobsEA. Let’s not contribute to disparities: the best methods for teaching clinicians how to overcome language barriers to health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(suppl 2):S189-S193.
30.
JacobsEADiamondLCStevakL. The importance of teaching clinicians when and how to work with interpreters. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:149-153.
31.
MihalicAPMorrowJBLongRBDobbieAE. A validated cultural competence curriculum for US pediatric clerkships. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79:77-82.
32.
LieDALee-ReyEGomezABereknyeiSBraddockCH3rd. Does cultural competency training of health professionals improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and proposed algorithm for future research. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:317-325.
33.
PronovostPJ. Navigating adaptive challenges in quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:560-563. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000026
PronovostPJBerenholtzSMNeedhamDM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:a1714. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1714
36.
HeifetzRGrashowALinskyM. The theory behind the practice. In: The Practice of Adaptive Leadership. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2009:13-40.
37.
GoenkaPK. Lost in translation: impact of language barriers on children’s healthcare. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016;28:659-666. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000404
38.
AnttilaARappaportDITijerinoJZamanNSharifI. Interpretation modalities used on family-centered rounds: perspectives of Spanish-speaking families. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7:492-498. doi:10.1542/hpeds.2016-0209
39.
ChestonCCAlarconLNMartinezJFHadlandSEMosesJM. Evaluating the feasibility of incorporating in-person interpreters on family-centered rounds: a QI initiative. Hosp Pediatr. 2018;8:471-478. doi:10.1542/hpeds.2017-0208
40.
NathensonRASalonerBRichardsMRRhodesKV. Spanish-speaking immigrants’ access to safety net providers and translation services across traditional and emerging US destinations. Milbank Q. 2016;94:768-799. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12231
41.
ColemanJSAngostaAD. The lived experiences of acute-care bedside registered nurses caring for patients and their families with limited English proficiency: a silent shift. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26:678-689. doi:10.1111/jocn.13567
42.
VanderWielenLMEnurahASRhoHY, et al. Medical interpreters: improvements to address access, equity, and quality of care for limited-English-proficient patients. Acad Med. 2014;89:1324-1327. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000296
43.
NápolesAMSantoyo-OlssonJKarlinerLSO’BrienHGregorichSEPérez-StableEJ. Clinician ratings of interpreter mediated visits in underserved primary care settings with ad hoc, in-person professional, and video conferencing modes. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21:301-317. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0269
44.
YinHSKhanARamotarM, et al. Impact of an inpatient family-centered communication intervention on preventable adverse events highest among families with limited English proficiency. Paper presented at: Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting; April 24–May 1, 2019; Baltimore, MD. Publication 4455.5.
45.
KahnASpectorNDBairdJD, et al. Patient safety after implementation of a coproduced family centered communication programme: multicenter before and after intervention study. BMJ. 2018;363:k4764. doi:10.1136/bmj.k4764
46.
StarmerAJSpectorNDSrivastavaR, et al; I-PASS Study Group. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1803-1812. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1405556
47.
StarmerAJSectishTCSimonDW, et al. Rates of medical errors and preventable adverse events among hospitalized children following implementation of a resident handoff bundle. JAMA. 2013;310:2262-2270. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281961
US Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; KohnLTCorriganJMDonaldsonMS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
50.
BakerDPGustafsonSBeaubienJMSalasEBarachPBattlesJ. Medical Teamwork and Patient Safety: The Evidence-Based Relation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research; 2003.
51.
WeaverSJLubomksiLHWilsonRFPfohERMartinezKADySM. Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5pt 2):369-374. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00002
52.
KingHBBattlesJBakerDP, et al. TeamSTEPPS™: team strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety. In: HenriksenKBattlesJBKeyesMAGradyML, eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
53.
HayashiASSeliaEMcDonnellK. Stress and provider retention in underserved communities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20:597-604. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0163
54.
EisensteinL. To fight burnout, organize. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:509-511. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1803771
55.
OlayiwolaJNWillard-GraceRDubéK, et al. Higher perceived clinic capacity to address patients’ social needs associated with lower burnout in primary care providers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29:415-429. doi:10.1353/hpu.2018.0028
56.
PantellMSDe MarchisEBuenoAGottliebLM. Practice capacity to address patients’ social needs and physician satisfaction and perceived quality of care. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17:42-45. doi:10.1370/afm.2334
57.
ChoYIJohnsonTPVangeestJB. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36:382-407. doi:10.1177/0163278713496425
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
