The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of access to communication technology on caregiver quality of life, neurodevelopmental, and medical outcomes (eg, rehospitalization, emergency room visits, or surgeries) in preterm infants, and enrollment in public assistance programs. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed families of preterm infants in a high-risk infant-follow-up clinic. We estimated associations of access to various modes of communication technology with outcomes, adjusting for sociodemographic and infant characteristics using linear and unconditional logistic regression. Access to email, text messaging, and smartphones was associated with higher quality of life scores on the Multicultural Quality of Life Index, and email and smartphone access was significantly associated with increased enrollment in early intervention. Evaluating smartphone and email access on neonatal intensive care unit discharge is important when considering enrollment in community programs and caregiver quality of life.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1119-1126.
2.
TurnerMWinefieldHChur-HansenA.The emotional experiences and supports for parents with babies in a neonatal nursery. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013;13:438-446.
3.
PurdyIBCraigJWZeanahP.NICU discharge planning and beyond: recommendations for parent psychosocial support. J Perinatol. 2015;35(suppl 1):S24-S28.
4.
HynanMTMountsKOVanderbiltDL.Screening parents of high-risk infants for emotional distress: rationale and recommendations. J Perinatol. 2013;33:748-753.
5.
AagaardHUhrenfeldtLSpliidMFegranL.Parents’ experiences of transition when their infants are discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13:123-132.
6.
SingerLTSalvatorAGuoSCollinMLilienLBaleyJ.Maternal psychological distress and parenting stress after the birth of a very low-birth-weight infant. JAMA. 1999;281:799-805.
7.
GarfieldCFLeeYKimHN.Paternal and maternal concerns for their very low-birth-weight infants transitioning from the NICU to home. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2014;28:305-312.
8.
CroninCMShapiroCRCasiroOGCheangMS.The impact of very low-birth-weight infants on the family is long lasting. A matched control study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:151-158.
9.
EnlowEFahertyLJWallace-KeeshenSMartinAESheaJALorchSA.Perspectives of low socioeconomic status mothers of premature infants. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20161310.
10.
SmithA.US Smartphone Use in 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015.
11.
DhillonASAlbersheimSGAlsaadSPargassNSZupancicJA.Internet use and perceptions of information reliability by parents in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2003;23:420-424.
12.
GabbertTIMetzeBBührerCGartenL.Use of social networking sites by parents of very low birth weight infants: experiences and the potential of a dedicated site. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172:1671-1677.
13.
De RouckSLeysM. Illness trajectory and Internet as a health information and communication channel used by parents of infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:1489-1499.
14.
ThorenEMMetzeBBuhrerCGartenL.Online support for parents of preterm infants: a qualitative and content analysis of Facebook “preemie” groups. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98:F534-F538.
15.
GundASjoqvistBAWigertHHentzELindecrantzKBryK.A randomized controlled study about the use of eHealth in the home health care of premature infants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:22.
16.
PlantinLDanebackK.Parenthood, information and support on the Internet. A literature review of research on parents and professionals online. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10:34.
MezzichJECohenNLRuiperezMABanzatoCEZapata-VegaMI.The Multicultural Quality of Life Index: presentation and validation. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:357-364.
19.
Zapata-VegaMIRiveraJTarlinNBijanIMaurerM.Using a brief 10-item generic measure of quality of life in English and Spanish speaking diabetic patients. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2010;40:399-411.
20.
AndersonPJBurnettA.Assessing developmental delay in early childhood—concerns with the Bayley-III scales. Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;31:371-381.
21.
BelfortMBSantoEMcCormickMC.Using parent questionnaires to assess neurodevelopment in former preterm infants: a validation study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27:199-207.
MeertKSlomineBSChristensenJR. et al. Burden of caregiving after a child’s in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018;127:44-50.
24.
Rose-JacobsRFioreJGde CubaSE. et al. Children with special health care needs, supplemental security income, and food insecurity. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016;37:140-147.
25.
BlackMMQuiggAMCookJ. et al. WIC participation and attenuation of stress-related child health risks of household food insecurity and caregiver depressive symptoms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:444-451.
26.
FleeglerEWLieuTAWisePHMuret-WagstaffS.Families’ health-related social problems and missed referral opportunities. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e1332-e1341.
27.
LakshmananAAgniMLieuT. et al. The impact of preterm birth <37 weeks on parents and families: a cross-sectional study in the 2 years after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:38.
28.
HassanABloodEPikcilingisA. et al. Improving social determinants of health: effectiveness of a web-based interventionAm J Prev Med. 2015;49:822-831.
29.
HassanABloodEAPikcilingisA. et al. Youths’ health-related social problems: concerns often overlooked during the medical visit. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53:265-271.
30.
WylieSAHassanAKrullEG. et al. Assessing and referring adolescents’ health-related social problems: qualitative evaluation of a novel web-based approach. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18:392-398.
31.
WildevuurSESimonseLW.Information and communication technology-enabled person-centered care for the “big five” chronic conditions: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e77.
32.
BusharJAFishmanJGarfinkelDPirrettiA. Enrolling underserved women in mHealth programs: results from Text4baby outreach campaigns. Health Promot Pract. 2019;20(2):292-299. doi:10.1177/1524839918763589
33.
EvansWDWallaceJLSniderJ.Pilot evaluation of the Text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1031.
34.
WhittakerRMatoff-SteppSMeehanJ. et al. Text4baby: development and implementation of a national text messaging health information service. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:2207-2213.
35.
BusharJAKendrickJSDingHBlackCLGrebySM.Text4baby influenza messaging and influenza vaccination among pregnant women. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53:845-853.
36.
RocheMISkinnerD.How parents search, interpret, and evaluate genetic information obtained from the Internet. J Genet Couns. 2009;18:119-129.
37.
AllenKRainieL.Parents Online. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2002.
38.
BapatRMcCleadRShepherdERyshenGBartmanT.Challenges, successes and opportunities for reducing readmissions in a referral-based children’s hospital NICU. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2016;9:433-440.
39.
WelchCDCheckJO’SheaTM.Improving care collaboration for NICU patients to decrease length of stay and readmission rate. BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6:e000130.
40.
ClementsKMBarfieldWDKotelchuckMWilberN.Maternal socio-economic and race/ethnic characteristics associated with early intervention participation. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12:708-717.
41.
MillerJE.Developmental screening scores among preschool-aged children: the roles of poverty and child health. J Urban Health. 1998;75:135-152.
42.
Shapiro-MendozaCKotelchuckMBarfieldW. et al. Enrollment in early intervention programs among infants born late preterm, early term, and term. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e61-e69.
43.
LittleAAKamholzKCorwinBKBarrero-CastilleroAWangCJ.Understanding barriers to early intervention services for preterm infants: lessons from two states. Acad Pediatr. 2015;15:430-438.
44.
DolJDelahunty-PikeASianiSACampbell-YeoM.eHealth interventions for parents in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15:2981-3005.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
