StrasburgerVCDonnersteinEBushmanB. Why is it so hard to believe that media influence children and adolescents?Pediatrics. 2014;133:571-573.
2.
JeongSChoHHwangY. Media literacy interventions: a meta-analytic review. J Commun. 2012; 62:454-472.
3.
McCannonB. Media literacy/media education: solution to big media? A review of the literature. In: StrasburgerVCWilsonBJJordanAB, eds. Children, Adolescents, the Media. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014:507-558.
4.
Council on Communications and Media. Media use by children younger than 2 years. Pediatrics. 2011;128:1040-1045.
AndersonCABerkowitzLDonnersteinE. The influence of media violence on youth. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003;4:81-110.
7.
CarnageyNLAndersonCA. The role of theory in the study of media violence: the General Aggression Model. In: GentileD, ed. Media Violence and Children. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2003:87-106.
8.
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, American Psychological Association, American Medical Association; American Academy of Family Physicians, American Psychiatric Association. Joint statement on the impact of entertainment violence on children: Congressional public health summit—July 26, 2000. http://www2.aap.org/advocacy/releases/jstmtevc.htm. Accessed August 29, 2015.
9.
BushmanBJAndersonCA. Media violence and the American public: scientific facts versus media misinformation. Am Psychol. 2001;56:477-489.
10.
Council on Communications and Media. Media violence (policy statement). Pediatrics. 2009;124:1495-1503.
11.
GentileD, ed. Media Violence and Children: A Complete Guide for Parents and Professionals. 2nd ed.Westport, CT: Praeger, 2014.
12.
HuesmannLRDubowEFYangG. Why it is hard to believe that media violence causes aggression? In: DillK, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013:159-171.
13.
Media Violence Commission, International Society for Research on Aggression (ISRA). Report of the media violence commission. Aggr Behav. 2012;38:335-341.
14.
MurrayJP. Media violence: the effects are both real and strong. Am Behav Sci. 2008;51:1212-1230.
15.
StrasburgerVCWilsonBJ. Television violence: 60 years of research. In: GentileDA, ed. Media Violence and Children. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2014:57-86.
GuernseyL. Garbled in translation: getting media research to the press and public. J Child Media. 2014;8:87-94.
19.
KennedyDOverholserG, eds. Science and the Media. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences; 2010. http://www.amacad.org/pdfs/scienceMedia.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2015.
20.
MooneyH. More “responsible” science reporting is needed, Leveson inquiry hears. BMJ. 2011;343:d8051. doi:10.1136/bmj.d8051.
21.
SullivanRPurushothamA. Analysis of media reporting of The Lancet Oncology Commission. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:12-13.
22.
StrasburgerVC. Should babies be watching screens? The answer is surprisingly complicated. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:967-968. doi:10.1111/apa.13105.
23.
PearlDBouthiletLLazarJ. Television and Behavior: Ten Years of Scientific Progress and Implications for the Eighties. Vol 2. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1982.
24.
RichM. Moving from child advocacy to evidence-based care for digital natives. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:404-406.
25.
GerbnerGMorganM. Against the Mainstream: The Selected Works of George Gerbner. New York, NY: Peter Lang; 2002.
26.
StrasburgerVC. Media matter: But “old” media may matter more than “new” media. Adolesc Med: State of the Art Rev. 2014:25:643-669.
27.
StrasburgerVC. Why isn’t there more media research?Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013;52:583-584.
28.
StrasburgerVCJordanABDonnersteinE. Children, adolescents, and the media: health effects. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012;59:533-588.
29.
StrasburgerVCWilsonBJJordanAB. Children, Adolescents, and the Media. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
30.
FritschlerALHoeflerJM. Smoking and Politics: Policy Making and the Federal Bureaucracy. 6th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2006.