Objective. We used online structured reflection to improve residents’ understanding of care delivery in the medical home. Methods. Third-year pediatric residents participated in an online curriculum on delivering effective, patient-centered primary care in the medical home to children with special health care needs. Residents were prompted to respond to questions designed to stimulate reflection. We qualitatively assessed their responses, graded their depth of reflection, and provided structured feedback. Results. Residents identified aspects of their practice consistent with medical home principles. Depth of reflection increased over time. Residents realized they needed to better understand families’ financial, emotional, and social needs and increase families’ involvement in care planning. Residents identified systems issues and practice changes to improve care delivery. Conclusions. Online reflective writing with feedback is a powerful strategy to improve residents’ learning. Residents identified and began to make practice changes to provide patient-centered care in a medical home.
Arauz BoudreauADVan CleaveJMGnanasekaranSKKurowskiDSKuhlthauKA. The medical home: relationships with family functioning for children with and without special health care needs. Acad Pediatr. 2012;12:391-398.
2.
StricklandBBJonesJRGhandourRMKoganMDNewacheckPW. The medical home: health care access and impact for children and youth in the United States. Pediatrics. 2011;127:604-611.
3.
National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. NS-CSHCN 2009/10. Data query from the Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative, Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health Web site. http://childhealthdata.org. Accessed January 22, 2013.
4.
LongWEBauchnerHSegeRDCabralHJGargA. The value of the medical home for children without special health care needs. Pediatrics. 2012;129:87-98.
NazarianBLGladerLChoueiriRShipmanDLSadofM. Identifying what pediatric residents are taught about children and youth with special health care needs and the medical home. Pediatrics. 2010;126(suppl 3):S183-S189.
7.
DobieS. Viewpoint: reflections on a well-traveled path: self-awareness, mindful practice, and relationship-centered care as foundations for medical education. Acad Med. 2007;82:422-427.
8.
SchonDA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1984.
9.
WearDZarconiJGardenRJonesT. Reflection in/and writing: pedagogy and practice in medical education. Acad Med. 2012;87:603-609.
10.
BoudD. Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. In: EnglishLMGillenMA, eds. Promoting Journal Writing in Adult Education (New Directions in Adult and Continuing Education, No. 90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001:6-18.
11.
BranchWTParanjapeA. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77:1185-1188.
12.
SchonDA. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1990.
13.
ChretienKGoldmanEFaselisC. The reflective writing class blog: using technology to promote reflection and professional development. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:2066-2070.
14.
SongPStewartR. Reflective writing in medical education. Med Teach. 2012;34:955-956.
15.
ToyECHarmsKPMorrisRK JrSimmonsJRKaplanALOwnbyAR. The effect of monthly resident reflection on achieving rotation goals. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21:15-19.
16.
McPhersonMArangoPFoxH. A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 1998;102:137-139.
17.
AronsonLNiehausBLindowJRobertsonPAO’SullivanPS. Development and pilot testing of a reflective learning guide for medical education. Med Teach. 2011;33:e515-e521.
18.
O’SullivanPAronsonLChittendenENiehausBLearmanL. Reflective ability rubric and user guide. MedEdPORTAL;2010. http://www.mededportal.org/publication/8133. Accessed January 22, 2013.
19.
SaldanaJ. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
20.
CreswellJW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.
21.
MaxwellJ. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.
22.
LongWECabralHJGargA. Are components of the medical home differentially associated with child health care utilization, health, and health promoting behavior outcomes?Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013;52:423-432.
23.
ChunchuKMaukschLCharlesCRossVPauwelsJ. A patient centered care plan in the EHR: improving collaboration and engagement. Fam Syst Health. 2012;30:199-209.
24.
WinkelAFHermannNGrahamMJRatanRB. No time to think: making room for reflection in obstetrics and gynecology residency. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2:610-615.
25.
EiffMPWallerEFogartyCT. Faculty development needs in residency redesign for practice in patient-centered medical homes: a P4 report. Fam Med. 2012;44:387-395.
26.
ChangABowenJLBuranoskyRA. Transforming primary care training—patient-centered medical home entrustable professional activities for internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:801-809.
27.
WittichCMReedDAMcDonaldFSVarkeyPBeckmanTJ. Perspective: Transformative learning: a framework using critical reflection to link the improvement competencies in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2010;85:1790-1793.
