The objective of this study was to determine perceived benefits, detriments, and barriers to communication between pediatric providers and home visitors. The authors performed a cross-sectional, qualitative study consisting of 3 focus groups with paraprofessional home visitors (n = 12), 6 with parents receiving home visiting (n = 33), and 4 with pediatric providers whose patients received home visiting (n = 19). Emerging themes were generated by an inductive analytic approach. Perceived benefits included home visitors assisting parents with communication, giving providers family information, and reinforcing providers' guidance. Detriments included parental concern of sharing confidential information and providers becoming aware of family issues for which they are unprepared to act. Barriers included parental consent, logistics of home visitor—provider communication, and providers' lack of knowledge about home visitor programs/roles. Greater coordination between home visitation programs and pediatric providers may strengthen home visiting services and reinforce advice and anticipatory guidance given by providers.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Medical Home Initiative for Children with Special Health Care Needs Project Advisory Committee.The medical home. Pediatrics. 2002;110:184-186.
2.
US Department of Health and Human Services.Healthy People 2010. Vols 1 and 2. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
3.
McPherson M. , Arango P., Fox H., et al. A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 1998 ;102:137-140.
4.
Weiss HBHome visits: necessary but not sufficient. Future Child. 1993;3:113-128.
5.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Child and Adolescent Health.The role of home-visitation programs in improving health outcomes for children and families. Pediatrics. 1998;101:486-489.
6.
Safe and Sound Campaign.A Comprehensive Family Support Strategy. Baltimore, MD: The Safe and Sound Campaign; 1999.
7.
Sheppard VB, Williams KP, Richardson JTWomen's priorities for lay health home visitors: implications for eliminating health disparities among underserved women. J Health Soc Policy . 2004;18:19-35.
8.
Jack SM, DiCenso A., Lohfeld L.A theory of maternal engagement with public health nurses and family visitors . J Adv Nurs. 2005;49:182-190.
9.
Baltimore's Safe and Sound Campaign.Success by 6. http://safeandsound.org/page.php?id=77. Accessed on April 17, 2008.
10.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Community Health Advisors: Models, Research, and Practice: Selected Annotations-United States. Vol I. Atlanta, GA : US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994.
11.
Task Force on the Future of Pediatric Education.The future of pediatric education II. Organizing pediatric education to meet the needs of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults in the 21st century. A collaborative project of the pediatric community. Pediatrics. 2000;105:157-212.
12.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Early Childhood and Adoption, and Dependent Care.The pediatrician's role in family support programs. Pediatrics . 2001;107:195-197.
13.
Rushton FE Jr; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Community Health Services. The pediatrician's role in community pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1092-1094.
14.
Stille CJ, Jerant A., Bell D., Meltzer D., Elmore JGCoordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:700-708.
15.
Sia C., Tonniges TF, Osterhus E., Taba S.History of the medical home concept. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1473-1478.
16.
Stille CJ, McLaughlin TJ, Primack WA, Mazor KM, Wasserman RCDeterminants and impact of generalist-specialist communication about pediatric outpatient referrals. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1341-1349.
17.
Stille CJ, Korobov N., Primack WAGeneralist-subspecialist communication about children with chronic conditions: an analysis of physician focus groups. Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3:147-153.
18.
Stille CJ, Primack WA, McLaughlin TJ, Wasserman RCParents as information intermediaries between primary care and specialty physicians . Pediatrics. 2007;120:1238-1246.
19.
Green LW, Kreuter MWHealth Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2005.
20.
Sofaer S.Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health Serv Res. 1999;34:1101-1118.
21.
Morgan DLThe Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
22.
2003 KIDS COUNT Factbook for Baltimore City.Baltimore, MD: Advocates for Children & Youth; 2003.
23.
Baltimore City Data Collaborative.Success by 6 Community Indicator Trends, 1998-2003. Baltimore, MD: Baltimore City Data Collaborative; 2005.
24.
Baltimore City Data Collaborative.Baltimore's Children: Citywide Statistics of Well-being. Baltimore, MD: Baltimore City Data Collaborative; 2003.
25.
National Healthy Start Association.The Healthy Start Program. Baltimore, MD: National Healthy Start Association; 2004.
Miles MB, Huberman AMQualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
28.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln Department of Psychology Research Design and Data Analysis Archive.Cohen's kappa. http://www.-class.unl.edu/psycrs/handcomp/hckappa.PDF . Accessed April 16, 2008.
29.
Landis JR, Koch GGThe measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33: 159-174.
30.
Kendrick D., Pritchard A., Cloke J., Barley M.Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of increasing information to health visitors about children's injuries. Arch Dis Child . 2001;85:366-370.
31.
Solomon BS, Minkovitz CS, Mettrick JE, Carraccio C.Training in community pediatrics: a national survey of program directors. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4:476-481.
32.
van Ryn M., Burke J.The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:813-828.
33.
Miller VA, Drotar D., Burant C., Kodish E.Clinician-parent communication during informed consent for pediatric leukemia trials. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005;30:219-229.
34.
Cooley WC, McAllister JWBuilding medical homes: improvement strategies in primary care for children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1499-1506.
35.
Hardy JB, Streett R.Family support and parenting education in the home: an effective-extension of clinic-based preventive health care services for poor children. J Pediatr. 1989;115:927-931.
