Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information. Results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003;289:2400-2406.
2.
Spielberg AR. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1998;280:1353-1359.
3.
Health on the Net Foundation (HON). HON code of conduct (HONcode) for medical and health web sites: principles. Available at: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html. Accessed May 27, 2003.
4.
Hi-Ethics, Inc.Health Internet ethics: ethical principles for offering Internet health services to consumers. Available at: http://www.hiethics.com/Principles/index.asp. Accessed May 27, 2003.
5.
Internet Healthcare Coalition. eHealth code of ethics. eHealth ethics initiative2000. Available at: http://www.ihealthcoalition.org/ethics/code0524.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2003.
6.
Ward BO. “Internet-positive patients” driving you crazy? Find out how to get online and cope. Internet Med. 1999;4:1-6.
7.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Americans in the information age falling through the net. October 2000. Available at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide. Accessed May 27, 2003.
8.
HIPAA Training Handbook for the Medical Staff: An overview of HIPAA. Marblehead, MA: Opus Communications, 2001.
9.
American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations. Opinions # E-5.025 Physician Advisory or Referral Services by Telecommunication. Chicago, IL: AMA, 1996.
10.
Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, et al.Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet: principles governing AMA web sites. JAMA. 2000;283:1600-1606.
11.
American Medical Association House of Delegates Annual Meeting. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs Report 3-A-02. Ethical Guidelines for the Use of Electronic Mail Between Patients and Physicians.”Chicago, IL, June 2002.
12.
eRisk Working Group for Healthcare: Guidelines for Online Communication. November 2002. Available at http://www.medem.com/phy/phy_eriskguidelines.cfm. Accessed June 30, 2003.
13.
American Academy of Pediatrics. The Internet and your family. Available at: http://www.aap.org/family/interfamily.htm. Accessed May 27, 2003.
14.
Public Workshop on Consumer Privacy on the Global Information Infrastructure. December 1996 Chapter IV. Children and privacy online. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy/privacy5.htm. Accessed May 27, 2003.
15.
US Code Collection. Children’s online privacy protection. Legal Information Institute. 15 U.S.C. 6501-6506, P.L. No 105-277, 122 Stat 2681-728. Available at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/ch91.html. Accessed June 30, 2003.
16.
American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations. Opinions # E-5.055 confidential care for minors. Chicago, IL: AMA, 1996.
17.
English A. Treating adolescents: legal and ethical considerations. Med Clin North Am. 1990;74:1097-1112.
18.
Sigman G, Silber TJ, English A, et al.Confidential health care for adolescents. Position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 1997;1:408-415.
19.
Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e20. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e20. Accessed May 27, 2003.
20.
Pew Internet and American Life. Vital decisions: how Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. May 22, 2002. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=59. Accessed May 27, 2003.
21.
Landro L. ‘E-Medicine’ projects are gaining acceptance: what most patients really want is online interaction with doctors. Wall Street Journal. Available at: http://www.wsf.com. Accessed May 22, 2003.
22.
Abramson L. Doctor-patient e-mail. National Public Radio: All Things Considered. 5/28/03. Available at: http://www.medem.com/press/press_medeminthenews_detail.cfm?ExtranetPressNewsKey=152. Accessed June 30, 2003.
23.
Seinfeld K. Doctors, patients and privacy. National Public Radio: All Things Considered. 5/28/03. Available at: http://www.medem.com/press/press_medeminthenews_detail.cfm?ExtranetPressNewsKey=153. Accessed June 30, 2003.
24.
Medem, Inc.Promoting Online Consultation™ to your patients. San Francisco, CA. Available at: http://www.medem.com/phy/phy_promote.cfm. Accessed June 23, 2003.
25.
Dyer KA. Ethical challenges of medicine and health on the Internet: a review. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e23. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e23. Accessed May 27, 2003.
26.
Rodrigues RJ. Ethical and legal issues in interactive health communications: a call for international cooperation. J Med Internet Res. 2000;2:e8. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2000/1/e8. Accessed May 27, 2003.
27.
Eysenbach G. Towards ethical guidelines for dealing with unsolicited patient emails and giving teleadvice in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship—systematic review and expert survey. J Med Internet Res. 2000;2:e1. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2000/1/e1/index.htm. Accessed May 27, 2003.
28.
Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the world wide web. JAMA. 1998;280:1333-1335.
29.
Richardson CR, Resnick PJ, Hansen DL, et al.Does pornography-blocking software block access to health information on the Internet? JAMA. 2002;288:2887-2894.
30.
Elliott SJ, Elliott RG. Internet list servers and pediatrics: newly emerging legal and clinical practice issues. Pediatrics. 1996;97:399-400.
31.
DeVille KA. Internet listservers and pediatrics: newly emerging legal and clinical practice issues II. Pediatrics. 1996;98:453-454.
32.
Patsos M. The Internet and medicine: building a community for patients with rare diseases. JAMA. 2001;285:805.
33.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Internet resource guide. Available at: http://www.aap.org/advocacy/washing/resources/irgd4-nlink.htm. Accessed May 27, 2003.