23. In re. LHR, 253 Ga 439; 321 SE2nd 716: Supreme Court of Georgia; 1984.
24.
24. In re. Guardianship of Andrew James Barry, 445 So. 2d 365: Florida Appeals Court; 1984.
25.
25. Coordinating Council of the National Center for State Courts. Guidelines for State Court Decision-Making in Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment Cases. 2nd ed.St. Paul: West Publishing; 1992.
27. Conroy, 98 NJ. at 368, 486 A.2d at 1234: New Jersey.
28.
28. Peter, 108 N.J. 365, 529 A.2d at 428: New Jersey.
29.
29. Grant, 109 Wash. 2d at 558, 747 P.2d at 452: Washington.
30.
30. U.S. Government. U.S. Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Amendments of 1984. Pub. L No. 98-457. 1984.
31.
31. U.S. Government. Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention and Treatment Program. Fed Register1985;50:14878-14901.
32.
32. Leicher CR, Di Mario FJ Jr.Termination of nutrition and hydration in a child with vegetative state. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148:87-92.
33.
33. Clark Fl.Intensive care treatment decisions: the roots of our confusion. Pediatrics. 1994;94:98-101.
34.
34. Kopelman LM, Irons TG, Kopelman AE.Neonatologists judge the "baby doe" regulations. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(11):677-683.
35.
35. Boppj, Nimz M.A legal analysis of the child abuse amendments of 1984. In: Caplan A, Blank RH, Merrick JC, eds. Compelled Compassion: Government Intervention in the Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992:73-103.
36.
36. Department of Health and Human Services. Child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment program. Fed Register1985;50:14879-14879.
37.
37. Caplan A, Cohen CB, Levin B, et al. Report of the hastings center research project on the care of imperiled newborns. Hastings Center Rep. 1987;17(6):5-32.
38.
38. Smith SR.Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Hastings Law Rev. 1986;37:765-825.
39.
39. Murray TH.The final, anticlimactic rule on baby doe. Hastings Center Rep. 1985;15(3):5-9.
40.
40. Nelson LJ, Rushton CH, Cranford RE, et al. Forgoing Medically Provided Nutrition and Hydration in Pediatric Patients.JLaw Med Ethics. 1995;23:33-46.
41.
41. Stanley JM, Abrams F, Admiraal PV, et al. Part III: Decisions involving neonates and other patients who have never achieved decision-making capacity. J Med Ethics. 1992;18[suppl]:13-15.
42.
42. Frader JChild abuse law (letter to the editor). Pediatrics. 1995;95(3):454-455.
43.
43. Based on review of legal decisions using Nexis-Lexis and other search engines.
44.
44. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL.A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
45.
45. Frader J, Thompson A.Ethical issues in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1994;41(6):1405-1421.
46.
46. White BC, Zimelman J.Abandoning informed consent: an idea whose time has not yet come. J Med Philosophy. 1998;23(5):477-499.
47.
47. Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, et al. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313-2320.
48.
48. Hershey P.A definition for paternalism. J Med Philosophy. 1985;10(2):171-182.
49.
49. Alfonso I, Lanting WA, Duenas D, et al. Discontinuation of artificial hydration and nutrition in hopelessly vegetative children. Ann Neurol. 1992;32(3):454-455.
50.
50. Fost N.Counseling families who have a child with a severe congenital anomaly. Pediatrics. 1981;67(3):321-322.
51.
51. Levi BH.Respecting Patient Autonomy.Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois Press: 1999.
52.
52. American Nurses Association. Position Statement in Foregoing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration. American Nurses Association; April 2, 1992.
53.
53. AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Persistent vegetative state and the decision to withdraw or withhold life support. JAMA. 1990;263:426-430.
54.
54. Lantos JD, Tyson JE, Allen A, et al. Withholding and withdrawing life sustaining treatment in neonatal intensive care: issues for the 1990s. Arch Dis Childhood. 1994;71:F218-F223.
55.
55. Mc Cann RM, Hall WJ, Groth-Juncker A.Comfort care for terminally ill patients: the appropriate use of nutrition and hydration. JAMA. 1994;272(16):1263-1266.
56.
56. Ashwal S, Bale JF, Coulter DL, et al. The persistent vegetative state in children: report of the child neurology society ethics committee. Ann Neurol. 1992;32:570-576.
57.
57. Lynn J, Childress JF.Must patients always be given food and water?Hastings Center Rep. 1983;13(2):17-21.
58.
58. Coulter DL.The vegetative state in infants: criteria and prognosis. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:473-473.
59.
59. May WE.Feeding and hydrating the permanently unconscious and other vulnerable persons. Issues Law Med. 1987;3:203-217.
60.
60. Rubenstein JS, Unti SM, Winter RJ.Pediatric resident attitudes about technological support of vegetative patients and the effects of parental input-a longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 1994;94(1):8-12.
61.
61. Siegler M, Weisbard AJ.Against the emerging stream: should fluids and nutritional support be discontinued?Arch Intern Med. 1985;145:129-131.
62.
62. Stanley A.Withholding artificially provided nutrition and hydration from disabled children-assessing their quality of life. Clin Pediatr. 2000;39:575-579.
63.
63. Annas G.Do feeding tubes have more rights than patients?Hastings Center Rep. 1986;16(1):26-28.
64.
64. Paris Jj, Fletcher AB.Infant doe regulations and the absolute requirement to use nourishment and fluids for the dying infant. Law Med Health Care. 1983:210-213.
65.
65. Campbell CS.Religious Ethics and Active Euthanasia in a Pleuralistic Society. Kennedy Inst Ethicsf1992;2(3):253-277.
66.
66. St. Joseph's HospitalEthical Principles in the Care of Impaired Infants. In: Thomasma D, ed. Medical Ethics: Policies, Protocols, Guidelines, & Programs, vol supplement 6. Albuquerque, NM: Aspen Publishers; 1998:2-7.
67.
67. The President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1983.
68.
68. Amundsen DW.The physician's obligation to prolong life: a medical duty without classical roots. Hastings Center Rep. 1978;8(4):23-30.
69.
69. Temkin OThe hippocratic physician. In: Tempkin O, Temkin L, eds. Ancient Medicine. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press; 1967:87-110.
70.
70. Barber PA, Marquis JG, Turnbull HR.Parental perspectives on treatment/nontreatment decisions involving newborns with spina bifida. In: Caplan AL, Blank RH, Merrick JC, eds. Compelled Compassion: Government Intervention in the Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns. Clifton, NJ: Humana; 1992.
71.
71. Culver G, Fallon K, Londner RB, et al. Informed decisions for extremely lowbirth-weight infants. JAMA. 2000;283(24):3201-3202.