Determinants of Infant Sleep Position in an Urban Population

Abstract

The incidence of SIDS has decreased by 40% since the Back to Sleep campaign was initiated. However, the rate of SIDS in the District of Columbia continues to be approximately double the national rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and determinants of prone sleeping among infants in the District of Columbia and to ascertain what information is being provided to parents by health care professionals by a cross-sectional survey of parents of infants 0-6 months of age presenting for well child care at Children's Health Center, Children's National Medical Center, in Washington, DC. We recruited a consecutive sample of 126 parent-infant pairs, of which 92.9% were African-American. The average infant was 73 days old, was 3,003 grams at birth, and was full term. When asked how the infants were placed for sleep the night before the interview, 34.1% of parents had placed the infant supine, 50.8% side, and 15.1% prone. Nearly half (48%) of infants slept in an adult bed with the mother. More than one third of the infants had been placed prone for sleep at least once since hospital discharge. Most common reasons for sleeping supine included SIDS risk reduction or health care professional advice. Side sleepers did so primarily because of concern about vomiting, health care provider advice, or SIDS. Infants were placed prone primarily because the infant slept better. When asked about information received from a health care provider, 70.6% of parents stated that they had received information about sleep position and 64.3% about the hazards of passive smoking. Eight parents observed nursery personnel placing their infants prone. Only 16.7% of the total study population had received a Back to Sleep brochure, read it, and recalled that it recommended back sleeping. Infants were more likely to sleep prone if there was a grandparent in the home (OR 2.9, p<0.05) or if they were the firstborn (OR 2.17, p<0.05). Infants were more likely to sleep supine if parents had heard a back recommendation from a health care professional (OR 5.7, p<0.001). Infants were least likely to sleep supine if the parents had heard a side or a side/back recommendation (OR 0.26, p=0.001). Infant sleep position was not affected by receiving or reading the Back to sleep brochure. In conclusion, more than one third (35.7%) of infants in this predominantly African-American population have been placed prone for sleep at least once; 15% slept prone the night before the interview. Almost one third of parents received no information about sleep position, but parents receiving a verbal supine recommendation were most likely to place their infant supine. Receiving written information did not affect sleep position. Improved educational efforts for parents of African-American newborns should continue to focus on encouraging supine positioning, smoke cessation, and other safe sleep practices.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Ponsonby A-L , Dwyer T , Gibbons LE , et al. Factors potentiating the risk of sudden infant death syndrome associated with the prone position. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:377-382.

2. Dwyer T , Ponsonby A-LB , Newman NM , Gibbons LE . Prospective cohort study of prone sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome. Lancet. 1991;337:1244-1247.

3. Mitchell EA , Scragg R , Stewart AW , et al. Results from the first year of the New Zealand cot death study. NZ Med J. 1991;104:71-76.

4. Irgens LM , Markestad T , Baste V , et al. Sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome in Norway 1967-91. Arch Dis Child. 1995;72:478-482.

5. Taylor JA , Krieger JW , Reay DT , et al. Prone sleep position and the sudden infant death syndrome in King County, Washington: a case-control study.J Pediatr. 1996;128:626-630.

6. Willinger M , Ko C-W , Hoffman HJ , et al. Factors associated with caregivers' choice of infant sleep position, 1994-1998: the national infant sleep position study.JAMA. 2000;283:2135-2142.

7. Guyer B , Hoyert DL , Martin JA , et al. Annual summary of vital statistics 1998. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1229-1246.

8. Ottolini MC , Davis BE , Patel K , et al. Prone infant sleeping despite the "Back to Sleep" campaign. Arch Pediatr-Adolesc Med. 1999;153:512-517.

9. Every KID COUNTS in the District of Columbia: Seventh annual Fact book. Washington, DC: D.C. KIDS COUNT Collaborative for Children and Families, 2000.

10.

10. Willinger M , Hoffman HJ , Wu K-T , et al. Factors associated with the transition to nonprone sleep positions of infants in the United States: the National Infant Sleep Position Study. JAMA. 1998;280:329-335.

11.

11. Brenner R , Simons-Morton BG , Bhaskar B , et al. Prevalence and predictors of the prone sleep position among inner-city infants. JAMA. 1998;280:341-346.

12.

12. Ray BJ , Metcalf SC , Franco SM , Mitchell CK . Infant sleep position instruction and parental practice: comparison of a private pediatric office and an inner-city clinic. Pediatrics. 1997;99:URL; http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/99/5/e12.

13.

13. Moon R , Cheng T , Patel K , et al. Parental literacy level and understanding of medical information. Pediatrics. 1998;102:URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/102/2/e25.

14.

14. SAS Institute Inc. , SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1990.

15.

15. Task Force on Infant Sleep Position and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome . Changing concepts of sudden infant death syndrome: implications for infant sleeping environment and sleep position. Pediatrics. 2000;105:650-656.