The objective of this prospective, randomized, and blinded study was to compare the use of chloral hydrate versus oral midazolam sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. No adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, paradoxical agitation, or significant deviations from baseline vital signs) were noted with either medication. No differences were noted in onset of sedation between the 2 groups, however, the time to complete recovery was significantly shorter with midazolam than with chloral hydrate. The children in the chloral hydrate group had a significantly deeper level of sedation and were more likely to receive a more nearly comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Committee on Drugs, American Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1110-1115.
2.
2. Silverman NH. Pediatric Echocardiography.Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1993: 1-108.
3.
3. Latson LA, Cheatham JP, Gumbiner CH, et al. Midazolam nose drops for outpatient echocardiography sedation in infants. Am HeartJ.1991;121:209-210.
4.
4. Graham SR, Day RO, Lee R, et al. Overdose with chloral hydrate: a pharmacological and therapeutic review. MedJAust.1988;149:686-688.
5.
5. Committee on Drugs and Committee on Environmental Health, American Academy of Pediatrics. Use of chloral hydrate for sedation in children. Pediatrics. 1993;92:471-473.
6.
6. Ronchera-Oms CL, Casillas C, MartiBonmati L, et al. Oral chloral hydrate provides effective and safe sedation in paediatric magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Pharm Therapeutics.1994;19:239-243.
7.
7. Greenberg SB, Faerber EN, Aspinall CL, Adams RC. High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. Am J Roentgenol.1993;161:639-641.
8.
8. ThompsonJR, Schneider S, Ashwal S, et al. The choice of sedation for computed tomography in children: a prospective evaluation. Radiology. 1982;143:475-479.
9.
9. Fox BES, O'Brien CO, Kangas KJ, et al. Use of high-dose chloral hydrate for ophthalmologic exams in children: a retrospective review of 302 cases. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus.1990;27:242-244.
10.
10. Mack RB. The original Blues Brothers-chloral hydrate overdose. Contemp Pediatr1997;14:85-95.
11.
11. Hirsch IA, Zauder HL. Chloral hydrate: a potential cause of arrhythmias. Anesth Analg.1986;65:691-692.
12.
12. Singer AJ. Intranasal midazolam in pediatric conscious sedation. Ann Emerg Med.1995;25:851-852.
13.
13. Silver T, Wilson C, Webb M. Evaluation of two dosages of oral midazolam as a conscious sedation for physically and neurologically compromised pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent.1994;16:350-359.
14.
14. Harcke HT, Grissom LE, Meister MA. Sedation in pediatric imaging using intranasal midazolam. Pediatr Radiol.1995;25:341-343.
15.
15. Lipshitz M, Marino BL, Sanders ST. Chloral hydrate side effects in young children: causes and management. Heart Lung.1993;22:408-414.
16.
16. Rumm PD, Takao RT, Fox DJ, Atkinson SW. Efficacy of sedation of children with chloral hydrate. South MedJ.1990;83:1040-1043.
17.
17. Napoli KL, Ingall CG, Martin GR. Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. J Pediatr.1996;129:287-291.
18.
18. Levine MF, Hartley EJ, Macpherson BA, et al. Oral midazolam premedication for children with congenital cyanotic heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery: a comparative study. Can J Anaesth.1993;40:934-938.
19.
19. MalinovskyJM, Populaire C, Cozian A, et al. Premedication with midazolam in children. Effect of intranasal, rectal, and oral routes on plasma midazolam concentrations. Anaesthesia.1995;50:351-354.
20.
20. Elder JS, Longenecker R. Premedication with oral midazolam for voiding cystourethrography in children: safety and efficacy. Am J Roentgenol.1995;164:1229-1232.
21.
21. Connors K, Terndrup TE. Nasal versus oral midazolam for sedation of anxious children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med.1994;24:1074-1079.
22.
22. McMillan CO, Spahr-Schopfer IA, Sikich N, et al. Premedication of children with oral midazolam. Can J Anaesth.1992;39:545-550.
23.
23. Hasmi A, Weatherdon D, Molitor BA, et al. Midazolam versus chloral hydrate as sedation for echocardiography in children. Pediatrics. 1997;100:S437-S437 (abstract).
24.
24. D'Agostino J, Terndrup TE. Chloral hydrate versus midazolam for sedation of children for neuroimaging: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000;16:14-14.
25.
25. Reeves ST, Wiedenfeld KR, WrobleskiJ, et al. A randomized double-blind trial of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine versus midazolam/acetaminophen in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. ASDCJDent Child. 1996;63:95-100.
