In this article, we use the technique of stochastic frontier estimation for the structural gravity model to analyse Vietnam’s bilateral trade and evaluate its exploitation of trade efficiency before and after its free trade agreements (FTAs) with China and India entered into force. The results from Vietnam’s bilateral trade data between 2000 and 2015 show that the ASEAN–India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA) has had a positive impact on Vietnam’s bilateral trade flows while we found a remarkably negative effect on Vietnam’s exports but not imports after the entry into force of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA). In addition, Vietnam’s participation in the regional trade agreements (RTAs) and FTAs has significantly reduced the costs of trade over time, and these impacts on Vietnam’s imports are much higher than those on Vietnam's exports.
AllenT.ArkolakisC.TakahashiY.2014. Universal Gravity. NBER Working Paper No. 20787. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
AndersonJ.E.1979. ‘A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation’, American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No. 1, 106–16.
3.
AndersonJ.E.WincoopE.2003. ‘Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle’, American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, 170–92.
4.
AndersonJ.E.YotovY.V.2016. ‘Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990–2002’, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 99, No. C, 279–98.
5.
ArkolakisC.CostinotA.Rodriguez-ClaireA.2012. ‘New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?’, American Economic Review, Vol. 102, No. 1, 94–130.
6.
ArmstrongS.2014. ‘Economics Still Trumps Politics between Japan and China’, International Affairs Kokusai Mondai, Vol. 634, 1–17.
7.
ArmstrongS.2007. Measuring Trade and Trade Potential: A Survey. Asia Pacific Economic Papers, No. 368, 1–19. Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
8.
ArmstrongS.PeterD.KalirajanK.2008. Asian Trade Structures and Trade Potential: An Initial Analysis of South and East Asian Trade. EABER Working Paper Series, No. 32. Canberra: EABER.
9.
BergstrandJ.H.1985. ‘The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, No. 3, 474–81.
10.
BhattacharyaSwapan K.DasGouranga GopalDo South-South Trade Agreements Enhance Member Countries’ Trade? Evaluating Implications for Development Potentials in the Context of SAARC (November1, 2011). UNU-CRIS Working Papers W-20011/2.
11.
CaliendoL.ParroF.2015. ‘Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA’, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 82, No. 1, 1–44.
12.
ChaneyT.2008. ‘Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade’, American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 4, 1707–21.
13.
ChorD.2010. ‘Unpacking Sources of Comparative Advantage: A Quantitative Approach’, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 82, No. 2, 152–67.
14.
CostinotA.DonaldsonD.KomunjerI.2012. ‘What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo’s Ideas’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 79, No. 2, 581–608.
15.
DeardoffA.1998. ‘Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?’, in FrankelJ. A. (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 7–32.
16.
Do Tri Thai. 2006. ‘A Gravity Model for Trade Between Vietnam and Twenty-three European Countries’, Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 8, 114–22.
17.
DrysdaleP.GarnautR.1982. ‘Trade Intensities and the Analysis of Bilateral Trade Flows in a Many-Country World: A Survey’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 62–84.
18.
DrysdaleP.HuangY.KalirajanK.P.2000. ‘China’s Trade Efficiency: Measurement and Determinants’, in DrysdaleP.ZhangY.SongL.,(eds), APEC and liberalisation of the Chinese economy, Asia Pacific Press, Canberra, 259–71.
19.
DürA.BacciniL.ElsigM.2014. ‘The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Database’, Review of International Organizations, Vol. 9, No. 3, 353–75.
HaiN.T.H.ThangD.N.2017. ‘The ASEAN Free Trade Agreement and Vietnam’s Trade Efficiency’, Asian Social Science, Vol. 13, No. 4, 192–200.
22.
HanhP.T.H.2011. ‘Does WTO Accession Matter for the Dynamics of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade?’, Economics of Transition, Vol. 19, No. 2, 255–85.
23.
HelpmanE.MelitzM.RubinsteinY.2008. ‘Trading Partners and Trading Volumes’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 123, No. 2, 441–87.
24.
CuongHoang ChiNhanBui Thi Thanh. 2013. ‘The Impact of 2008 Global Financial and Economic Crisis 2008 on Foreign Trade of Vietnam’, Journal of Science and Development, Vol. 11, No. 5, 751–66.
25.
HoangChi CuongDoThiBichNgocBuiThiPhuongMaiDangHuyen Linh. 2013. ‘Trade Liberalization and Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam: A Gravity Model Using Hausman-Taylor Estimator Approach’, Journal of Science and Development, Vol. 11, No. 1, 85–96.
26.
KalirajanK.1999. ‘Stochastic Varying Coefficients Gravity Model: An Application in Trade Analysis’, Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 185–93.
27.
KalirajanK.2007. ‘Regional Cooperation and Bilateral Trade Flows an Empirical Measurement of Resistance’, The International Trade Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, 85–107.
28.
KalirajanK.2008. ‘Gravity Model Specification and Estimation: Revisited’, Applied Economic Letter, Vol. 15, No. 13, 1037–39.
29.
KalirajanK.FindlayC.2005. “Estimating Potential Trade Using Gravity Models: A Suggested Methodology”, Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development, Tokyo.
30.
KalirajanK.SinghK.2008. ‘A Comparative Analysis of China’s and India’s Recent Export Performances’, Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1–28.
31.
LinnemanH.1966. An Econometric Study of World Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
32.
MayerT.ZignagoS.2011. Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Paper No. 2011-25. Paris: Centre d’Études Prospectives et d’Information Internationales.
MiankhelA.K.ThangaveluS.M.KalirajanK.2009. ‘On Modeling and Measuring Trade Potential’, in Conference on Quantitative Approaches to Public Policy. Bangalore, India.
35.
NasirS.KalirajanK.2013. Export Performance of South and East Asia in Modern Services. ASARC Working Papers 2013–07. Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
36.
ThuNguyen Anh. 2012. ‘Assessing the Impact of Vietnam’s Integration Under AFTA and VJEPA on Vietnam’s Trade Flows, Gravity Model Approach’, Yokohama Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 2, 137–48.
37.
ThuNguyen AnhDucTran Trung. 2014. ‘Analyzing the Impacts of ASEAN Trade Liberalization on Vietnam’s Trading of Electronics Products’, Yokohama Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 6, 61–71.
38.
ThiNguyenHaTrangNguyenThiThanhTamVu HoangNam. 2011. An Inquiry into the Determinants of the Vietnamese Product Export. Working Paper No.2011/08. Vietnam: Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN).
39.
OliveroM.P.YotovY.V.2012. ‘Dynamic Gravity: Endogenous Country Size and Asset Accumulation’, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1, 64–92.
40.
PoyhonenP.1963. ‘A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between Countries’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 90, No. 1, 93–100.
41.
RopertoS.D.EdgardoD.C.2014. ‘Philippine Export Efficiency and Potential: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model’, World Journal of Economic and Finance, Vol. 1, No. 2, 6–15.
42.
ThanhV.T.DuongN.A.2011. Revisiting Exports and Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam’, Asian Economic Policy Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 112–31.
43.
TinbergenJ.1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
44.
HieuTran TrungThuyPham Thi Thanh. 2010. ‘Ứng dụng mô hình lực hấp dẫn trong thương mại quốc tế: Các nhân tố tác động đến xuất khẩu của Việt Nam’ [Application of Gravity Models in International Trade: Factors affecting Vietnam’s Exports], Tạp chí Quản lý Kinh tế [Economic Management Review], Vol. 31, No. (3+4/2010), 12–25.
45.
AnhTu ThuyThangDao Nguyen. 2008. ‘Các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến mức độ tập trung thương mại của Việt Nam với ASEAN + 3’ [Factors Affecting the Level of Trade Concentration of Vietnam with ASEAN +3], Research Paper No. NC-05/2008. CEPR, University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
46.
DungVu KimHuongMai Thi Lan. 2012. ‘Quan hệ thương mại Việt Nam và 19 đối tác chính – Phân tích các nhân tố ảnh hưởng và khuyến nghị chính sách’, [Vietnam Trade Relations with 19 Key Partners—Analysing Influencing Factors and Policy Recommendations], Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển [Journal of Economics & Development], Vol. Special Issue, No. Sep-2012, 88–92.
47.
WeeC.K.2013. ‘Brunei Darussalam’s Trade Potential and ASEAN Economic Integration: A Gravity Model Approach’, Southeast Asian Journal of Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 67–89.
48.
XuanN.T.XingY.2008. ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Exports the Experiences of Vietnam’, Economics of Transition, Vol. 16, No. 2, 183–97.
49.
YotovY.V.2012. ‘A Simple Solution to the Distance Puzzle in International Trade’, Economics Letters, Vol. 117, No. 3, 794–98.
50.
YotovY. V.PiermartiniR.MonteiroJ.-A.LarchM.2016. An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model. World Trade Organization.
51.
YuventusE.2014. ‘ASEAN Free Trade Agreement Implementation for Indonesian Reading Performance: A Gravity Model Approach’, Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, Vol. 8, No. 1, 73–92.
