Naturalizing a global ‘world of capitalist totality’ serves as a modality for normalizing global processes of capital accumulation. However ‘global’ remains a project evinced in specific forms of cultural action and practices. This preliminary article juxtaposes two vastly separated spheres of global economy and society that are rarely considered together. The haute sphere of a crisis ridden global financial system increasingly sees its salvation in mobilizing and disposing of the ‘surpluses of the Orient’ in a manner that speeds up global capital accumulation. In this light the financial crisis and the enhanced global role and aspirations of Asian states, in particular China and India, may lead to compromises in the ways both states have articulated local, national and global accumulation processes to one another, and mediated their impact on marginalized domestic social groups. Historians have traditionally misrecognized struggles of subordinated social groups to resist surrendering their claims to capital or resist proletarianization. It has now become more important than ever to revisit these struggles and their redoubts to uncover cultural and political actions for grounding the ‘global’, and the practices, idioms and relationships of resistance to them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderlini, Jamil, ‘German industrialists attack China’, Financial Times, 18 July 2010, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e57a722a-928f-11df-9142-00144feab49a.html (accessed on 15 July 2010).
2.
Anderson, Jonathan, ‘The Myth of Chinese Savings’, Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 172, No. 9, November 2009, pp. 24–30.
3.
Aubrey, Henry G., ‘Behind the Veil of International Money’, Princeton Essays in International Finance, No. 71, January 1969, pp. 17–21.
4.
Back, Aaron, ‘China’s Blunt Talk for Obama: Regulator Says U.S. Policy Puts Global Recovery at Risk as President Arrives in Beijing’, Wall Street Journal, 16 November 2009, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125826103009548975.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories (accessed on 15 July 2010).
5.
Balachandran, G., John Bullion’s Empire: British Gold Problems and India between the Wars (London: Routledge, 1996).
6.
Balachandran, G., ‘The Interwar Slump in India: The Periphery in a Crisis of Empire’, in Theo Balderston (ed.), The World Economy and National Economies in the Interwar Slump (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003), Chapter 6.
7.
Beattie, Alan and Jamil Anderlini, ‘Friends’ of China question relationship’, Financial Times, 19 July 2010.
8.
Bernanke, Ben, ‘The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit’, US Federal Reserve, March 2005, http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2005/200503102/ (accessed on 15 July 2010).
9.
Birla, Ritu, Stages of Capital: Law, Culture, and Market Governance in Late Colonial India (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009)
10.
Blanchard, Olivier and Francesco Giavazzi, ‘Rebalancing Growth in China: A Three-Handed Approach’, Working Paper 05–32, Department of Economics, MIT, 2005.
11.
Blinder, Alan, ‘Offshoring: The Next Industrial Revolution?’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2, March–April 2006, pp. 113–28.
12.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘Universalism and Belonging in the Logic of Capital’, Public Culture, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2000, pp. 653–678.
13.
Chamon, Marcos and Eswar Prasad, ‘Why are Saving Rates of Urban Households in China Rising?’, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2010, pp. 93–130.
14.
Chari, Sharad, Fraternal Capital: Peasan-Workers, Self-Made Men and Globalization in Provincial India (Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004).
15.
Chatterjee, Partha, The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993).
16.
Chatterjee, Partha, Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World (Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004).
17.
Cooper, Robert, The Postmodern State and the World Order (London: Demos and the Foreign Policy Centre, 2000).
18.
de Grazia, Victoria, Irresistible Empire: America’s Advance through 20th Century Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).
19.
Duara, Prasenjit, ‘History and Globalization in China’s Long Twentieth Century’, Modern China, Vol. 34, No. 1, January 2008, pp. 152–64.
20.
Edin, Maria, ‘Local State Corporatism and Private Business’, Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 30, Nos 3–4, 2003, pp. 278–95.
21.
Ferguson, James, The Anti-politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994), 25–74.
22.
Gidwani, Vinay, Capital Interrupted: Agrarian Development and the Politics of Work in India (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008).
23.
Govindu, Venu Madhav and Deepak Malghan, ‘Building a Creative Freedom: J.C. Kumarappa and his Economic Philosophy’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 40, No. 52, 24 December 2005, pp. 5477–85.
24.
Gupta, Akhil, Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999).
25.
Ho, Karen, ‘Situating Global Capitalisms, A View from Wall Street Investment Banks’, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2005, pp. 68–96.
26.
Hofman, Bert and Louis Kuijs, ‘A Note on Saving, Investment, and Profits of China’s Enterprises’, World Bank, October 2006, http://go.worldbank.org/T6AYRRWUK0. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/576f81cc-933a-11df-96d5-00144feab49a.html (accessed on 15 July 2010).
27.
Immelt, Jeffrey, ‘They Won’t Let Us Win’, China Real Time Report, Wall Street Journal, 2 July 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2010/07/02/immelt-on-china-they-wont-let-us-win/ (accessed on 15 July 2010).
28.
Joffe, Josef, ‘The Default Power: The False Prophecy of America’s decline’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 5, September–October 2009, pp. 21–35.
29.
King Jr., Neil and Jason Dean, ‘Untranslatable Word In US Aide’s Speech Leaves Beijing Baffled’, Wall Street Journal, 7 December 2005, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB113391933493415775.html (accessed on 15 July 2010).
30.
Lutringer, Christine, ‘La nouvelle gouvernance de l’agriculture en Inde: les réponses des mouvements paysans à l’ouverture internationale’, unpublished PhD Thesis, The Graduate Institute, Geneva, 2009.
31.
Maurer, Bill, ‘Forget Locke? From Proprietor to Risk-bearer in New Logics of Finance’, Public Culture, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1999, pp. 365–85.
32.
McKinsey Global Institute, ‘The “Bird of Gold”: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market’, May 2007.
33.
McKinsey Global Institute, ‘If you’ve got it, spend it: Unleashing the Chinese Consumer,’ August 2009, http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/greaterchina/mckonchina/reports/MGI_Unleashing_Chinese_Consumer_full_report.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2010).
34.
National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS), Reports on Financing of Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector & Creation of a National Fund for the Unorganised Sector (NAFUS) (New Delhi: Government of India, 2007).
35.
National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS), Main Report: The Challenge of Employment in India: An Informal Economy Perspective, Vol. 1 (New Delhi: Government of India, 2009).
36.
Nee, Victor, ‘Bottom-Up Economic Development and the Role of the State: A Focus on China’, Sociologica, Vol. 1, 2010, p. 5, http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/journal/article/index/Article/Journal:ARTICLE:370/Item/Journal:ARTICLE:370 (accessed on 15 July 2010).
37.
Nigam, Aditya, ‘Genealogies of Globalisation: Unpacking the “Universal” History of Capital’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 42, No. 12, 24 March 2007, pp. 1047–53.
38.
Stephens, Philip, ‘India faces a choice: is it a big power or great power?’, Financial Times, 19 March 2009, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/92dbb440-14bc-11de-8cd1-0000779fd2ac.html (accessed on 15 July 2010).
39.
Raj, K.N., ‘The Politics and Economics “Intermediate Regimes”’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 8, No. 27, 7 July 1973, pp. 1189–98.
40.
Roach, Stephen, The Next Asia: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Globalization (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley International, 2009).
41.
Roxborough, Ian, ‘Cold war, Capital Accumulation, and Labour Control in Latin America: The Closing of a Cycle, 1945–1990’, in Allen Hunter (ed.), Rethinking the Cold War (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998).
42.
Samuelson, Paul, ‘Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 18, No. 3, Summer 2004, pp. 135–46.
43.
Sanyal, Kalyan, Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive Accumulation, Governmentality, and Post-Colonial Capitalism (New Delhi: Routledge, 2007).
44.
Smart, Alan and George C.S. Lin, ‘Local Capitalisms, Local Citizenship and Translocality: Rescaling from Below in the Pearl River Delta Region, China’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2007, pp. 280–302.
45.
Takeda Hiroko, ‘Structural Reform of the Family and the Neoliberalisation of Everyday Life in Japan’, New Political Economy, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2008, pp. 153–72.
46.
The Economist, ‘Rural Job Guarantees: Faring Well’, 5 November 2009.
47.
Thompson, Grahame, ‘What’s in the Frame? How the Financial Crisis is Being Packaged for Public Consumption’, Economy and Society, Vol. 38, No. 3, August 2009, pp. 520–24.
48.
Walder, Andrew, ‘Local Government as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China’s Transitional Economy’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 101, No. 2, 1995, pp. 263–301.
49.
Wolf, Martin, ‘Why China must do more to rebalance its economy’, Financial Times, 22 September 2009, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/160e4cc4-a7a7-11de-b0ee-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Bfg8oTU1 (accessed on 15 July 2010).
50.
World Bank, Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, World Bank Policy Report (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).
51.
Zoellick, Robert, ‘Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility?’, Speech to the National Committee on United States–China Relations, New York, 21 September 2005, http://www.ncuscr.org/articlesandspeeches/Zoellick.htm (accessed on 15 July 2010).
