On 1 July 1997, Hong Kong, a colony (euphemistically called dependent territory) of Britain, was returned to the fold of the motherland, China, as a Special Administration Region, with a high degree of autonomy. Ten years on, we find that the common law system established by the British in Hong Kong, as guaranteed by the Basic Law, survived and thrived. A cursory review of legal and social science literature shows that there is little scholarly discourse or public debate on the proper jurisprudence standards to be applied in the making and evaluation of Hong Kong legislation. This research raises a most fundamental policy qua jurisprudence issue: Should Hong Kong law be formulated, applied or evaluated with indigenous legal standards and local jurisprudence principles, based on Asian values, Chinese culture and/or Hong Kong ethos? In so doing, this article questions the appropriateness and challenges the legitimacy of adopting Western jurisprudence principles in shaping and evaluating the Hong Kong legal system, especially after 1 July 1997.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, Jeffrey , We, The Jury ( New York: Basic Books , 1994).
2.
Alford, William P. , ‘ Law, Law, What Law?: Why Western Scholars of Chinese History and Society Have Not Had More to Say about Its Law ’, Modern China, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1997, pp. 398–419 .
3.
Bayley, David , Forces of Order ( Berkeley: University of California Press , 1991).
4.
Bell, Daniel , ‘ Which Rights Are Universal? ’, Political Theory, Vol. 27, No. 6, 1999, pp. 849–56 .
5.
Berlin, Isiah , et al. (Eds), The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence ( New York: Noonday Press , 1954), pp. 13–16.
6.
Berman, Harold J. , ‘ The Historical Foundation of Law ’, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 54, 2005.
7.
Black, Donald , The Behavior of Law ( New York: Academic Press , 1976).
8.
Bodley, John H. , ‘ An Anthropological Perspective from Cultural Anthropology: Tribes, States, and the Global System ’, http://www.wsu.edu:8001/vcwsu/commons/topics/culture/culture-definitions/bodley-text.html#top1994.
9.
Clark, David , ‘The Many Meanings of Rule of Law’, http://www.lfip.org/lawe506/documents/lawe506david`e.pdf
10.
Duara, Prasenjit , ‘ Response to Philip Huang’s “Biculturality in Modern China and in Chinese Studies” ’, Modern China, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2001, pp. 32–37 .
11.
Dubs, Homer H. , ‘ “Nature” in the Teaching of Confucius ’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 50, 1930, pp. 233–37 .
12.
Dutton, Michael R. , Policing and Punishment in China: From Patriarchy to ‘the People’ ( New York: Cambridge University Press , 1992).
13.
Dutton, Michael R. , ‘ Borge Bakken: Policing and Punishment in China: From Patriarchy to “The People” ’, The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, No. 31, 1994a, pp. 121–23 .
14.
Dutton, Michael R. , ‘ Arif Dirlik: Policing and Punishment in China: From Patriarchy to “the People” ’, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 99, No. 4, 1994b, pp. 1145–47 .
15.
Dyke, Jon M. Van , ‘ Merciful Juries: The Resilience of Jury Nullification ’, Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, 1991: pp. 164–183 .
16.
Esherick, Joseph W. , ‘ Cherishing Sources from Afar ’, Modern China, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1998, pp. 135–61 .
17.
Foucault , Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of Prison ( Harmondsworth: Peeregrine Books , 1979).
18.
Fuller, Lon , ‘ The Case of the Speluncean Explorers ’, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, 1949, pp. 616–45 .
19.
Fung, Daniel R. and Q.C., J.P. ‘ The Rule of Law in Hong Kong in the Run-Up to 1997 and Beyond ’, Heritage Lecture No. 561, 30 January 1996.
20.
Gergen, Mark G. , ‘The Jury’s Role in Deciding Normative Issues in the American Common Law’, 68 Fordham 407, 128, 1999.
21.
Gittings, Danny Gittings , ‘Changing Expectations: How the Rule of Law Fared in the First Decade of the Hong Kong SAR’, http://www.hkjournal.org/PDF/2007_fall/2.pdf.
22.
Golding, Martin P. , Philosophy of Law ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. , 1975).
23.
Granberry, Michael , ‘ Abortion Protest Juries Told to Ignore Nullification Ad ’, L.A. Times (San Diego County Edition), 27 January 1990.
Harding, Harry , ‘ From China, with Disdain: New Trends in the Study of China ’, Asian Survey, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1982, pp. 934–58 .
26.
Hovenkamp, Herbert , ‘ The Political Economy of Substantive Due Process ’, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1988, pp. 379–447 .
27.
Howard, G.J. , Newman, G. , and Pridemore, W.A. ‘Theory, Method, and Data in Comparative Criminology’, Criminal Justice 2000, Vol. 4 ( Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice ), 2000, pp. 139–211.
28.
Hu, Tao-Wei , ‘ The Chinese Version of the Law of Nature ’, International Journal of Ethics, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1927, pp. 27–43 .
29.
Hua, Ho (Ed.), The Transplantation and Indigenization of Law ( Beijing: Falu Chubanshe , 2000).
30.
Huang, Philip C.C. , ‘ County Archives and the Study of Local Social History: Report on a Year’s Research in China ’, Modern China, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1982, pp. 133–43 .
31.
Huang, Philip C.C. , ‘ Theory and the Study of Modern Chinese History: Four Traps and a Question ’, Modern China, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1998, pp. 183–208 .
32.
Huang, Philip C.C. , ‘ Biculturality in Modern China and in Chinese Studies ’, Modern China, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2000, pp. 3–31 .
33.
Huang, Philip C.C. , ‘ Court Mediation in China, Past and Present ’, Modern China, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2006, pp. 275–314 .
34.
Huang Yongmin , ‘ Hexie shehui yujing xia de “zhifa ru shui” linian ji qi shijian” (The concept and practice of “implementation of law like water” within the language of harmonious society) ’ Jaingcha Fengyun, 2007-03-05, 12:04:15, http://www.cnjccn.com/article/2007/0305/article_329.html.
35.
Huo Cunfu , ‘ The Cultural Traits of Traditional Chinese Legal Culture—The Origination, Development and Prospect of Qing-Li-Fa ’, Legal System and Society Development, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, http://www.legal-history.net/articleshow.asp?id=1824
36.
Hus, Berry Fong Chung , The Common Law System in Chinese Context ( New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc. , 1992).
37.
Jackson , ‘ Donald, Judge Instructs “Camden 28” Jury ’, New York Times, 18 May 1973.
38.
Jian, He ‘ Giving due consideration to “qing, li, fa”, magistrate fulfill his duty in settling “human relations case” (“Jiangu qing li fa” yuanling bing gong banliao “renqing an”) ’ Fazhi wen bao2006-8-5 4:38:03, http://www.oldbeijing.net/Article/200608/20060805043803.shtml.
39.
Keller, Perry , ‘ Sources of Order in Chinese Law ’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1994, pp. 711–59 .
40.
Liang Zhiping , Seeking Harmony in Natural Order (Xuzhao zhiran zhixu zhing de hexie) (Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe), 1997.
41.
Ma Zuowu , Chinese Traditional Legal Culture (Zhongguo gudai falu wenhua) (Jinan daixu chubanshje),1998, pp. 136–42.
42.
McCartney, Hervin , Cherishing Men from Afar ( South Carolina: Duke University Press , 1995).
43.
Michelson, Ethan , ‘ The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: Chinese Lawyers at Work ’, Law & Society Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2006.
44.
Mills, C. Wright , The Sociological Imagination ( New York: Oxford University Press , 1959 [1976]) (Sociological imagination allows us to see mundane social facts in different light.)
45.
Nicholson, Michael W. , ‘ Abusing Wittgenstein: The Misuse of the Concept of Language Games in Contemporary Theology ’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1996, pp. 617–30 .
46.
Patterson, Orlando , Freedom in the Making of Western Culture (Basic Books, 1991).
47.
Peerenboom, Randall , ‘ Let One Hundred Flowers Bloom, One Hundred Schools Contend: Debating Rule of Law in China ’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2002, pp. 471–544 .
48.
Perry, Elizabeth J. , ‘ Trends in the Study of Chinese Politics: State-Society Relations ’, China Quarterly (CQ), No. 139, 1994, pp. 704–13 .
49.
Prosner, William , Law of Tort ( St. Paul, Minnesotta:West Publishing Co, 1971).
50.
Pye, Lucian W. , ‘ Review: Social Science Theories in Search of Chinese Realities ’, China Quarterly (CQ), No. 132, 1992, pp. 1161–70 .
51.
Pye, Lucian W. , ‘ Asia Studies and the Discipline ’, PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2001, pp. 805–07 .
52.
Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. , Structure and Function in Primitive Society: Essays and Addresses ( London: Cohen and West , 1952).
53.
Sen, Amartya , Human Rights and Asian Values ( Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs , 1997).
54.
Shambaugh, David , ‘ Keeping Pace with a Changing China: CQ at 35 ’, China Quarterly, No. 143, 1995, pp. 669–76 .
55.
Shapiro, David L. and Lon L. Fuller , ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers: A Fiftieth Anniversary Symposium Foreword: A Cave Drawing For The Ages’, 112 Harvard Law Review1834.
56.
Siu-kai Lau and Kuan Hsin-chi , The Ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese ( Hong Kong: Chinese University Press , 1988).
57.
‘ Subverting Hong Kong’s Autonomy ’. Times.com, 20 September 2002, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,501021007-356128,00.html.
58.
Wai Man, Sin and Chu Yiu Wai , ‘ Whose Rule of Law? Rethinking Post-Colonial Legal Culture in Hong Kong ’, Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1998, pp. 147–69 .
59.
Wang, E. Yun , ‘ Qing Li Fa Conflicts in Maintenance Disputes ’, Law in Oriental Eyes, 26 April 2007, http://www.dffy.com/fayanguancha/sh/200704/20070426194557.htm (accessed on 14 February 2010).
60.
Wakeman, Frederic Jr. , Policing Shanghai, 1927–1937 ( California: University of California Press ; Reprint edition, 1996).
61.
Wesley-Smith, Peter , ‘ Hong Kong Institutions Law in Hong Kong and China: The Meshing of Systems ’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 547, 1996, pp. 104–17 .
62.
Wong, Bobby K.Y. , ‘ Dispute Resolution by Officials in Traditional Chinese Legal Culture ’, Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2003.
63.
Wong, Kam C. , Asian Policing in the 21st Century (Proceedings) ‘Closing Remarks’ (AAPS Presidency Inauguration Speech) AAPS Third Annual Conference: Asian Policing in the 21st Century, Open University, 29 July 2002. Co-sponsored by Center for Criminology, Hong Kong University, Open University, Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong: AAPS, 2002).
64.
Wong, Kam C. , ‘ Confucianization of the Law: A Study of Speech Crime Prosecution in China ’, Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2004.
65.
Wong, Kam C., ‘The Study of Criminology in China’ (on file with author).
66.
Wu Qin-dian , ‘Revelation about Traditional Chinese Law which Accommodate qing li fa’ (Qing lif fa jian ron de zhonguo gudai falu ji qishi) (Accommodating QLF, revelation of Chinese imperial law), http://www.legalhistory.com.cn/ (accessed 16 February 2007).
67.
Xu Zhongming , Precedents, Stories and Judicial Culture of Ming Qing Dynasties (Anli, Gushi yu Ming Qing shiqi de shifa wenhua) ( Beijing: Falu Chubanshe , 2006).
68.
Xin, Fan Zhong , Qing Li Fa Yu Zhong GuoRen (QLF and the Chinese) ( Beijing: Chinese People’s University Press , 1992).
69.
Xin, He , ‘ Why Do They Not Comply with the Law? Illegality and Semi-Legality among Rural-Urban Migrant Entrepreneurs in Beijing ’, Law & Society Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2005, pp. 527–62 .
70.
Yu, Fan , ‘ The Contradiction and Integration of Qing Li Fa Xinhua Wen ’, http://news.xinhuanet.com/school/2003-07/31/content_1003791.htm accessed 7 July 2003.
71.
Yuan, Gu , ‘Conflict and Reconciliation between Following and Not Following the Law: Balancing Qing and Fa “Xun fa yu beifa de maodun you tuoxie, zhuo yu fail zi ping”’, Legal History Project (16 February 2007).
72.
Zhu Xudong , ‘Regarding Certain Issues Regarding Research on Police Studies’ (Guanyu jingcha xuexi yanjiu zhong jige wenti de tantao) , Journal of Chinese People’s Public Security University, Vol. 101, 2002, pp. 149–55 .
