Geopolitical Obstacles to the DPRK's Development Strategy in a Historical Perspective

Abstract

This article will engage in a brief survey of the geopolitical impediments to development in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). One cannot comprehend the present without understanding the thread which runs from the past to the present. Even a perfunctory knowledge of regional geography will highlight that the DPRK lies at the intersection of China–Russia–Japan and US interests. The central issues in the DPRK's developmental strategy are (1) state/regime survival and (2) resource allocation. In its earliest days the administration of Kim Il Sung was bedevilled by two alternative factions within the Workers Party: the Irkutsk faction beholden to the patronage of the USSR, which opted for and lost a leadership struggle in 1955, and the Yan'an faction of Chinese-oriented veterans. Once Kim Il Sung's power was consolidated, the primary adversary was and remains the United States and its ally Japan. Cumulatively both of these historical experiences have resulted in a total distortion of resource allocation; in the first instance because of the need to establish an independent identity, mooting the juche concept as its focus; and in the second, because of military expenditure of Herculean proportions. Reportedly 25 to 30 per cent of the population is either in the Korean People's Army or the Red Militia.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brinkley, Joel , ‘U.S. Squeezes North Korea's Money Flow’, available at: nytimes.com, accessed 10 March 2006.

Chang, Jae-Soon , ‘ North Korea Touts First Strike Capability ’, Forbes, 22 March 2006.

Chol, Kim Myong , ‘Perspective on the Nuclear Stand off’, available at: http://www.kimsoft.com/2003/kmc-021118.htm

Foley, James , Jane's Intelligence Review, 1 March 2006.

General Bell , Testimony before U.S. House Armed Services Committee , Reuters, 22 March 2006.

Japan Times on line, ‘ Coordination With Japan, South Korea ’, 9 March 2006.

Johnson, Chalmers , ‘On Our Military Empire’, available at: http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?emx=x&pid=70243. Accessed on 15 September 2005.

Kyodo Washington , ‘ Pyongyang to Deploy Missiles That Threaten US in the Pacific ’, Japan Times on line, 9 March 2006.

‘Korea: Implications for Inter-Korean Security’, in Suh, Dae-Sook & Lee, Chae-jin , North Korea After Kim Il Sung ( Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner , 1998).

10.

Lee, Young, W. , Former ROK Admiral [Interview], Korean Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, May 1977, p. 18 .

11.

Marquand, Robert , Christian Science Monitor, 1 March 2006, posted on Japan Focus, 19 March 2005.

12.

New York Times, 15 April 2006.

13.

Noland, Marcus , ‘Prospects for the North Korean Economy’.

14.

Olsen, Edward A. , ‘The Conventional Military Strength of North Korea: Implications for Inter-Korean Security’, in Dae-Sook Suh and Chae-jin Lee (Eds.), North Korea after Kim Il Sung ( Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner , 1998).

15.

Vorontsov, Alexander , North Korea During the Process of Change, Joint US–Korea Academic Studies, Vol. 16, 2006 ( Washington, DC: Korean Economics Institute ).