Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-6
Sharing with the public at large? Yes! But a risky business: Possible roles,if any,of scholars of religion regarding promotion of public knowledge and understanding of religion
Based on decades of experience as a scholar who has engaged with the public through media interviews and writings in popular outlets, this article reflects on the possible roles of and methodological challenges for the scholar of religion offering his/her expertise to the broader public. The author encourages colleagues to “go public” but also warns them: it is a risky business.
BorupJ (2022) Identity Turn: Managing Decolonization and Identity Politics in the Study of Religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion34: 162–181.
2.
ChernusI (2008) The War in Iraq and the Academic Study of Peligion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion76(4): 844–873.
JensenT (1998) The scholar of Religion as a Cultural Critic: Perspectives from Denmark. CSSR Bulletin27(2): 40–43.
5.
JensenT (2007) From Respected Religion Expert to Cartoon: the Fate of a Religion Scholar Going Public?CSSR Bulletin36(4): 100–103.
6.
JensenT (2019a) From respected religion scholar expert to cartoon character: Reflections in the wake of the Danish Muhammad cartoon crisis and three decades as expert to the media. Changing Societies & Personalities3(4): 333–352.
JensenTKjeldsenK (2024) Religious Literacy in Denmark: What is That – if Anything? In: EnstedtDFlensnerKKKardemarkW (eds.) Religious Literacy in Secular Religious Education. Nordic Perspectives and Beyond. Münster: Waxmann Verlag: 125–142
9.
JensenTRothsteinM (eds.) (2000) Secular Theories on Religion. Current Perspectives. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press
10.
KjøllerC (2007) Manipulation. En Håndbog. København: Borgen
11.
LincolnB (2005) Responsa Miniscula. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion17(1), 59–67. DOI: 10.1163/1570068053429884
12.
McCutcheonR T (2005) Affinities, Benefits, and Costs: The ABCs of Good Scholars Gone Public. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion17(1), 27–43. DOI: 10.1163/1570068053429857
13.
MurphyT (2000) Speaking Different Languages: Religion and the Study of Religion. In: JensenTRothsteinM (eds.) Secular Theories on Religion. Current Perspectives. Copenhagen:Museum Tusculanum Press: 183–192
14.
RothsteinM (2007) Societal Conflict and the Scholar of Religion: A Personal Comment. CSSR Bulletin36 (4): 97–99
15.
WiebeD (2005) The Politics of Wishful Thinking? Disentangling the Role of the Scholar-Scientist from that of the Public Intellectual in the Modern Academic Study of Religion. Temenos41(1): 7–38. DOI: 10.33356/temenos.4800
