Issues pertaining to the relationship between science and religion, like creationism, Intelligent Design, and New Atheism, are increasingly the focus of social scientific research. This research often does not differentiate clearly between different kinds of social actors. At the most basic level, professional developers and distributors of systems of thought that deal with the relationship between science and religion, and laypeople who take up this knowledge, or parts of it, must be distinguished. Based upon interview material from the large, multinational study Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum, we identify five typical dimensions of lay knowledge vis-à-vis professional knowledge: reinterpretation of professional labels; neglect of important parts of knowledge systems; addition of knowledge; lower ascription of relevance; and an individual ethical framing.
AechtnerT (2014) Darwin-skeptic mass media: Examining persuasion in the evolution wars. Journal of Media and Religion13(4): 187–207.
2.
AechtnerT (2016) Challenging the Darwin skeptics: Examining proevolutionist media persuasion. Journal of Media and Religion15(2): 78–99.
3.
AllumNSibleyESturgisPStonemanP (2014) Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics. Public Understanding of Science23(7): 833–849.
4.
BakerJO (2013) Acceptance of evolution and support for teaching creationism in public schools: The conditional impact of educational attainment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion52(1): 216–228.
5.
BauerMW (2008) Survey research and the public understanding of science. In: BucchiMTrenchB (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge, pp. 111–113.
6.
BauerMWAllumNMillerS (2007) What have we learnt from 25 years of PUS research – liberating and widening the agenda. Public Understanding of Science16(1): 79–95.
7.
BeheM (2006) Darwin’s Black Box. The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: The Free Press.
8.
BrookeJCantorG (2000) Reconstructing Nature. The Engagement of Science and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
CampbellJLQuincyCOssermanJPedersenO (2013) Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research42(3): 294–320.
10.
ClémentP (2013) Muslim teachers’ conceptions of evolution in several countries. Public Understanding of Science24(4): 400–421.
11.
ClémentPQuessadaMPCastéraJ (2013) Creationism and innatism of teachers in 26 countries. Journal INEDP1(1).
12.
DawkinsR (2006) The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.
13.
DoolinBMotionJ (2010) Christian lay understandings of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Public Understanding of Science19(6): 669–685.
14.
DrummondH (1904) The Ascent of Man. New York: James Pott.
15.
Elsdon-BakerF (2015) Creating creationists: The influence of “issues framing” on our understanding of public perceptions of clash narratives between evolutionary science and belief. Public Understanding of Science24(4): 422–439.
16.
EmmelN (2014) Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
17.
EvansJH (2011) Epistemological and moral conflict between religion and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50(4): 707–727.
18.
EvansJH (forthcoming) The public’s views of the relationship between religion and science – and proposed reasons why the idea will not die. In: NumbersRLHardinJ (eds) The Idea that Wouldn’t Die: The Warfare between Science and Religion. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
EvansJHEvansMS (2008) Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology34(1): 87–105.
20.
EveRAHarroldFB (1991) The Creationist Movement in Modern America. Boston, MA: Twayne Publishers.
21.
ForrestBGrossPR (2003) Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
HilderingPConsoliLVan den BornR (2013) Denying Darwin: Views on science in the rejection of evolution by Dutch Protestants. Public Understanding of Science22(8): 988–998.
23.
HillJ (2014a) National Study of Religion and Human Origins. Grand Rapids, MI: BioLogos Foundation.
KadenT (2016) “Thousands…not billions!” Professional creationists and their opponents in the United States. Zeitschrift für Theologie und Gemeinde21: 277–289.
26.
KadenT (forthcoming) Creationism in the United States. A Sociology of the Conflict between Professional Creationists and Anti-Creationists, 1960–2013. New York: Springer.
27.
LightmanB (2001) Victorian sciences and religions: Discordant harmonies. Osiris, Science in Theistic Contexts: Cognitive Dimensions16: 343–366.
28.
LongDE (2011) Evolution and Religion in American Education: An Ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.
29.
McCainKKampourakisK (2016) Which question do polls about evolution and belief really ask, and why does it matter?Public Understanding of Science. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516642726.
30.
MeyerSC (2009) Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design. London: HarperOne.
31.
NumbersRL (2006) The Creationists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
NumbersRL (2009) Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
PetersTHewlettMJ (2003) Evolution from Creation to New Creation: Conflict, Conversation, and Convergence. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
34.
RussellB (1967) Why I am not a Christian and other essays on religion and related subjects. London: Touchstone.
35.
ScottE (2005) Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
SinatraGMSoutherlandSAMcConaughyFDemastesJW (2003) Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching40(5): 510–528.
37.
SturgisPAllumN (2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science13(1): 55–74.
38.
TaberKBillingsleyBRigaFNewdickH (2011a) To what extent do pupils perceive science to be inconsistent with religious faith? An exploratory survey of 13–14-year-old English pupils. Science Education International22(2): 99–118.
39.
TaberKBillingsleyBRigaFNewdickH (2011b) Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education95(6): 1000–1025.
40.
ToumeyCP (1994) God’s Own Scientists: Creationists in a Secular World. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41.
UeckerJELuckeG (2011) Protestant clergy and the culture wars: An empirical test of Hunter’s thesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50(4): 692–706.
42.
WeberM (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
WeberM (2001) Author’s introduction. In: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
44.
WengrafT (2001) Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods. London: Sage.
45.
WynneB (1992) Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors?Public Understanding of Science1(1): 37–43.
