In 2008 Canada’s Prime Minister apologized to survivors of Canada’s Indian Residential Schools, which had operated for almost a century, and were intended to assimilate Aboriginal children into the dominant society. Some survivors appreciated the gesture. Others were critical, especially of the Prime Minister’s description of the schools as a “mistake” rather than a crime, which they convincingly argue they were, with respect to the crime of genocide. I will suggest in this essay that this was not the only omission—that the school system also profoundly violated religious freedom. By exploring dominant Canadian narratives concerning religious freedom, I will highlight the way in which: (i) the system was intended to be a religious assault; (ii) the system contravened dominant understandings of freedom of religion; and (iii) dominant understandings of religion have marginalized Aboriginal religion, such that the profoundly religious character of the residential school assault has yet to be fully confronted.
Assembly of First Nations (21 October2005) Supreme Court Blackwater v. Plint decision re-affirms Federal Government’s liability in Residential Schools cases. Available at: http://www.afn.ca/article.asp?id=1770 (accessed 10 February 2009).
3.
BeamanLG (2002) Aboriginal spirituality and the legal construction of freedom of religion. Journal of Church and State44(1) (Winter): 135–149.
4.
BorrowsJ (2008) Living law on a living Earth: Aboriginal religion, law, and the Constitution. In: MoonR (ed.) Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 161–191.
Canadian Human Rights Commission (nd) Submission of the Canadian Human Rights Commission to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights: Same sex marriages. Government of Canada. Available at: http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/legislation_policies/submission_marriage-eng.aspx (accessed 20 September 2008).
7.
ChrisjohnRNicholasABStateKCravenJ (Omahkohkiaayo i’poyi), WasacaseTLoisellePSmithAO (62008) A sort-of apology completely and utterly not accepted. Available at: http://www.marxmail.org/ApologyNotAccepted.htm (accessed 25 February 2009).
FarrowD (ed.) (2004) Recognizing Religion in a Secular Society: Essays in Pluralism, Religion, and Public Policy. Montreal and Kingston, Ont.: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
12.
GuinDE (2002) Faith on Trial: Communities of Faith, the First Amendment, and the Theory of Deep Diversity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
LongCH (2003) Indigenous People, materialities, and religion: Outline for a new orientation to religious meaning. In: ReidJ (ed.) Religion and Global Culture: New Terrain in the Study of Religion and the Work of Charles H. Long. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 167–180.
18.
MacklemPRiskRCBRogersonCJSwintonKEWeinribLEWhyteJD (1997) Canadian Constitutional Law. Second edition. Toronto: Edmund Montgomery Publications.
19.
McLachlinB (2004) Freedom of religion and the rule of law: A Canadian perspective. In: FarrowD (ed.) Recognizing Religion in a Secular Society: Essays in Pluralism, Religion, and Public Policy. Montreal and Kingston, Ont.: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
20.
McLachlinB (542004) Remarks of the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, PC. Protecting constitutional rights: A comparative view of the United States and Canada. Supreme Court of Canada. Available at: http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/court-cour/ju/spe-dis/bm04-04-05-eng.asp (accessed 2 December 2008).
21.
MillerJR (1996) Shingwauk’s Vision: A History of Native Residential Schools. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
22.
MillerJR (2001) The State, the Church, and Indian Residential Schools in Canada. In: Van DieM (ed.) Religion and Public Life in Canada: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 109–129.
23.
OgilvieMH (2005) Between Liberté and Égalité: Religion and the State in Canada. In: RadanPMeyersonDCroucherRF (eds) Law and Religion: God, the State and the Common Law. New York: Routledge, pp. 134–167.
24.
Ontario Court of Appeal (1984) R. v. Videoflicks, 14 DLR (4th) 10.
25.
RadanPMeyersonDCroucherRF (eds) Law and Religion: God, the State and the Common Law. New York: Routledge.
26.
Supreme Court of Canada (1953) Saumur v. City of Quebec, 2 SCR 299.
27.
Supreme Court of Canada (1955) Chaput v. Romaine, SCR 834.
28.
Supreme Court of Canada (1959) Roncarelli v. Duplessis, SCR 121.
29.
Supreme Court of Canada (1985) Jack and Charlie v. The Queen, 2 SCR 332.
30.
Supreme Court of Canada (1985) R. v. Big M Drug Mart, 1 SCR 295.
31.
Supreme Court of Canada (1992) Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud, 2 SCR 970.
32.
Supreme Court of Canada (2004) Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2 SCR 551.
33.
Supreme Court of Canada (2005) Blackwater v. Plint, SCC 58, 3 SCR 3.
34.
Supreme Court of Canada (2006) Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, SCC 6, 1 SCR 256.
35.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015) The Survivors Speak: A Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Winnipeg, Man.: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.
36.
United Nations (121991) Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information DPI/1055. Available at: http://www.serendipity.li/more/con_geno.html (accessed 6 November 2008).
37.
Van DieM (ed.) (2001) Religion and Public Life in Canada: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
38.
WeaverJ (1998) Losing my religion. In: WeaverJ (ed.) Native American Religious Identity: Unforgotten Gods. New York: Orbis Books, pp. 217–229.
