In the increasingly multicultural society of north America, occupational therapists have a responsibility to develop awareness and knowledge concerning different cultural groups. By accepting and understanding clients' customs, values and beliefs, clinicians have a better chance of assessing and producing more effective outcomes. Since occupational therapy has incorporated western middle-class values into its theory and practice, many evaluation tools used are based on norrns developed for a white middle-class population. Using these evaluations with minority groups brings the danger of improper interpretation of test results. Consequently, increasing emphasis is being placed on the importance of culture fairness and the development of culture-fair evaluation tools for usage across different cultural groups. This paper will present a discussion concerning the importance, advantages and disadvantages of both culture-fair and culture-specific tests and evaluation tools.
AikenL. R. (1991). Psychological testing and assessment (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
AnastasiA. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
3.
BehnkeC. J.FetkovichM. M. (1984). Examining the reliability and validity of the play history. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 94–100.
4.
CliffordP. I.FishmanJ. A. (1963). The impact of testing programs on college preparation and attendance. Sixtysecond yearbook of National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
ChristiansenC. (1993). Continuing challenges of functional assessment in rehabilitation: Recommended changes. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 258–259.
6.
DillardM.AndonianL.FloresO.LaiL.MacRaeA.ShakirM. (1992). Culturally competent occupational therapy in a diversely populated mental health setting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 721–726.
7.
DyckI. (1989). The immigrant client: Issues in developing culturally sensitive practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 248–255.
8.
DyckI. (1993). Health promotion, occupational therapy and multiculturalism: Lessons from research. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 120–129.
9.
EvansJ.SalimA. A. (1992). A cross-cultural test of the validity of occupational therapy assessments with patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 685–695.
10.
FisherA. G.LiuY.VelozoC.PanA. W. (1992). Cross-cultural assessment of process skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 876–885.
11.
FisherA.Short-DegraffM. (1993). Improving functional assessment in occupational therapy: Recommendation and philosophy for change. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 199–201.
12.
FitzgeraldM.H. (1992). Multicultural clinical interaction. Journal of Rehabilitation, 58, 38–42.
13.
GrangerC.HamiltonB.SherwinF. (1988). Functional Independence Measure. Buffalo: State University of New York Press.
14.
GregoryR. J. (1992). Psychological testing: History, principles and application. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
15.
JungersenK. (1992). Culture, theory, and practice of occupational therapy in New Zealand / Aotearoa. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 745–750.
16.
KielhofnerG. (Ed.). (1985). A Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
17.
KinebanianA.StomphM. (1992). Cross-cultural occupational therapy: A critical reflection. American Journal of Occupation Therapy, 46, 751–757.
18.
KlavinsR. (1972). Work-play behavior: Cultural influences. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26, 176–179.
19.
KleinR. M.BellB. (1988). Self-care skills: Behavioral assessment with the Klein-Bell ADL scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 335–338.
20.
KlineP. (1986). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. New York: Methuen.
21.
KreftingL. (1992). Strategies for the development of occupational therapy in the third world. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 758–761.
22.
KreftingL.KreftingD. (1991). Cultural influences on performance. In ChristiansenC. and BaumC. (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Overcoming human performance deficits (pp. 101–122). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
23.
LawM.BaptisteB.McCollM. A.OpzoomerA.PolatajkoH.PollockN. (1990). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An outcome measurement protocol for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 82–87.
24.
LehmanA. F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51–62.
25.
LevineR. (1984). The cultural aspects of home care delivery. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 734–738.
26.
MahoneyF. I.BarthelD. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.
27.
MannW. C.KlyczekJ. (1988). Commentary on “A comparison of pediatric patients and normal subjects based on the Model of Human Occupation”. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 8, 25–37.
28.
MercerJ. (1977). System of multicultural pluralistic assessment (SOMPA). New York: Psychological Corporation.
29.
MeyersC. (1992). Hmong children and their families: Consideration of cultural influences in assessment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 737–744.
30.
MillerL. (1992). Evaluating the developmental skills of Cambodian orphans. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 8, 73–87.
31.
MirkopoulosC.EvertM. M. (1994). Cultural connections: A challenge unmet. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 67–70.
32.
MoseyA. C. (1986). Psychosocial components of occupational therapy. New York: Raven.
33.
PattonM. Q. (1985). Culture and evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Pope-DavisD. B.PrietoL. R.WhitakerC. M.Pope-DavisS. A. (1993). Exploring multicultural competencies of occupational therapists: Implication for education and training. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 838–844.
35.
ReynoldsC. R. (1982). Methods for decting construct and predictive bias. In BerkR. A., (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias (pp. 199–227). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
SamudaR.J. (1982). Psychological testing of American minorities: Issues and consequences. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
SanchezV. (1964). Relevance of cultural values. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17, 1–5.
38.
SchroederC. V.BlockM. P.TrottierE. C.CampbellM. S. (1978). Adult Psychiatric Sensory Integration Evaluation (2nd experimental ed.). La Jolla, CA: SBC Research Associates.
39.
SilvaF. (1993). Psychometric foundation and behavioral assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
40.
SkawskiK. A. (1987). Ethnic/racial considerations in occupational therapy: A survey of attitudes. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 4, 37–46.
41.
SpadoneR. A. (1992). Internal-external control and temporal orientation among south-east Asians and white Americans. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 713–719.
42.
TrickettE. J.MoosR. H. (1973). The social environment of junior high and highschool classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 93–102.
43.
TromblyC. (1993). Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 253–257.
44.
Van de VijverF. J.PoortingaY. H. (1991). Testing across cultures. In HambletonR. K. and ZaalJ. N., (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing: Theory and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45.
WeiringaN.McCollM. A. (1987). Implications of the model of human occupation for intervention with native Canadians. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 4, 73–87.
