The role of kinesthetic stimulation in motor learning and performance of a gross motor task was investigated. Forty healthy female adult volunteers, ages 20 to 30 years old, were required to learn a gross motor task involving the kicking of a ball. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two training groups, a kinesthetic stimulus group or a non-kinesthetic stimulus group. Results indicated that kinesthetic stimulation during practice and retention phases seemed to enhance task acquisition. Kinesthetic stimulation may have provided important feedback information for the learners that might have enabled them to make the necessary adjustments during performance. In addition, it appears that the stimulation affected the motor memory processes and left a more stable representation of the movement pattern. The use of continuous pressure as a means of kinesthetic stimulation for the facilitation of motor skill acquisition is recommended, although further research is required in order to generalize these findings to the clinic.
AdamsJ. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150.
2.
AdamsJ. A. (1977). Feedback theory of how joint receptors regulate the timing and positioning of a limb. Psychological Review, 84, 504–523.
3.
BairstowP.J. & LaszloJ.I. (1981). Kinaesthetic sensitivity to passive movements and its relationship to motor development and motor control. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 606–616.
4.
BurgessM. K. (1989). Motor control and the role of occupational therapy: Past, present, and future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 345–348.
5.
CohenH. (1989). Occupational therapy and motor control. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 289–290.
6.
DickinsonJ. (1974). Proprioceptive control of human movement. London: Lepus Books.
7.
FleishmanE. A. & RichS. (1963). The role of kinesthetic and spatial-visual abilities in perceptual motor learning. Journal of experimental psychology, 66, 6–11.
8.
GeronE. (1986). Kinesthesis. In ZaichkowskyL. D. & FuchsC. Z. (Eds.), The psychology of motor behavior: Development, control, learning and performance (pp. 215–235). Ithaca, NY: Mouvement Publications.
9.
GlinerJ. A. (1985). Purposeful activity in motor learning theory: An event approach to motor skill acquisition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 28–34.
10.
GlinerJ. A., & DavisC. G. (1984). The effects of movement speed and initial position on movement reproduction accuracy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4 (3), 181–192.
11.
HinsonM. M. (1981). Kinesiology. Dubuque, LA: Wm. C. Brown.
12.
JarusT. (1989). Contextual interference and task classification effects on acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skills by female adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, NY.
13.
KatzN. (1985). Occupational therapy's domain of concern: Reconsidered. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 518–524.
14.
KeeleS. W. (1973). Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
15.
KirkR.E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). California: Brooks/Cole.
16.
McCloskeyD. I. (1985). Knowledge about muscular contractions. In EvartsE. V., WiseS. P. & BousfieldD. (Eds.), The motor system in neurobiology (pp. 149–153). Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical.
17.
McCormackG.L. (1990). The Rood approach to the treatment of neuromuscular dysfunction. In PedrettiL.W., & ZoltanB. (Eds.), Occupational therapy practice skills for physical dysfunction (3rd ed.) (pp. 311–333). St. Louis: Mosby.
18.
MoseyA. C. (1981). Configuration of a profession. NY: Raven.
19.
MulderT., & HulstynW. (1984). Sensory feedback therapy and theoretical knowledge of motor control and learning. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 63, 226–244.
20.
PaillardJ. & BruchonM. (1968). Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In FreedmanS. J. (Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior (pp.37–55). New York: Dorsey.
21.
RedonC., HayL., & VelayJ.L. (1991). Proprioceptive control of goal-directed movements in man, studied by means of vibratory muscle tendon stimulation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 101–108.
22.
RoodM. S. (1962). The use of sensory receptors to activate, facilitate, and inhibit motor response, autonomic and somatic, in developmental sequence. In SattelyC. (Ed.), Approaches to the treatment of patients with neuromuscular dysfunction. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
23.
SageG. H. (1984). Motor learning and control: A new neuropsychological approach. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown.
24.
SchmidtR. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
25.
SchmidtR. A. (Ed.). (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
26.
SchmidtR. A. (1991). Motor learning and performance, from principles to practice. IL: Human Kinetics.
27.
SpencerE. A. (1988). Functional restoration: Neurologic, orthopedic, and arthritic conditions, In HopkinsH.L. & SmithH.D. (Eds), Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy (pp. 461–515, 7th Ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
28.
SteelR.G.D., & TorrieJ.H. (1960). Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Books.
29.
SwartzL. (1978). Role of kinesthesia in arousal and learning behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 1219–1225.
30.
TraceyD. J. (1985). Joint receptors and the control of movement. In EvartsE. V., WiseS. P. & BousfieldD. (Eds.), The motor system in neurobiology (pp. 149–153). Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical.
31.
TromblyC. A. (Ed.). (1989). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
32.
WatsonJ. D. G., ColebatchJ. G. & McCloskeyD. I. (1984). Effects of externally imposed elastic loads on the ability to estimate position and force. Behavioral Brain Research, 13, 267–271.
