The Effectiveness of a Multisensory Writing Programme for Improving Cursive Writing Ability in Children with Sensorimotor Difficulties

Abstract

French

Children with sensorimotor difficulties experience significant challenges in the ability to write adequately. A single case experimental design with multiple baselines across behaviours was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a multisensory writing programme for improving the cursive writing ability of four children with sensorimotor difficulties. Five distinct letter groups were taught in random order, one group every two weeks. Repeated measurements of writing speed and quality for each letter group were made. Visual analysis indicated that specific letter groups for all of the children changed following intervention. Statistical analysis indicated that quality scores of one child changed significantly while there were no significant changes in overall speed scores. Teacher reports before and following the programme suggest that intervention may have had a positive effect on self-confidence in written output. Further research is needed to evaluate the use of multisensory writing programmes by occupational therapists working with this specific population.

Keywords

Evaluation studies Handwriting retraining Sensorimotor dysfunction Single subject research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres

A. J.

(1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A. J.

(1985). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Bailey

C. A.

(1988). Handwriting: Ergonomics, assessment and instruction. British Journal of Special Education, 15, 65–71.

Barlow

Hersen

(1985). Single case experimental designs. Toronto: Pergamon Press.

Beery

K. E.

(1967). Developmental test of visual-motor integration. Chicago: Follett.

Benbow

(1988). Loops and other groups — a kinesthetic writing system. Randolph, N. J.: O. T. Ideas.

Birch

H. G.

Lefford

(1967). Visual differentiation, intersensory integration, and voluntary motor control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 32, 2.

Bruininks

R. H.

(1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Freeman

F. N.

(1917). How children learn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Furner

B. A.

(1969a). The perceptual-motor nature of learning in handwriting. Elementary English, 46, 886–894.

11.

Furner

B. A.

(1969b). Recommended instructional procedures in a method emphasizing the percepaial-motor nature of learning in handwriting. Elementary English, 46, 1021–1030.

12.

Furner

B. A.

(1970). An analysis of the effectiveness of a program of instruction emphasizing the perceptual-motor nature of learning in handwriting. Elementary English, 47, 61–69.

13.

Graham

(1983). The effect of self-instructional procedures on LD students' handwriting performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 231–234.

14.

Hammill

Larsen

(1983). Test of written language. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.

15.

Laszlo

J. I.

Bairstow

P. J.

(1983). Kinesthesis: Its measurement, training and relationship to motor control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 411–421.

16.

Laszlo

J. I.

Bairstow

P. J.

(1985). Perceptual-motor behaviour: Developmental assessment and therapy. London: Holt, Saunders & Winston.

17.

Laszlo

J. I.

Broderick

P. A.

(1991). Drawing and handwriting difficulties: Reasons for and remediation of dysfunction. In Wann

, Wing

A. M.

, & Sovik

(Eds.). Development of Graphic Skills. London: Academic Press.

18.

Lawton

S. B.

Currie

A. B.

(1980). Handwriting. Ministry of Education, Government of Ontario.

19.

Loikith

Ritter

L. K.

(1989). Review: A guide to handwriting. O.T. Week, 3, 4–5, 30–31.

20.

Oliver

(1990). A sensorimotor program for improving writing readiness skills in elementary age children. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 111–116.

21.

Ottenbacher

K. J.

(1986). Evaluating clinical change: Strategies for occupational and physical therapists. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

22.

Robin

A. L.

Armel

O'Leary

D. K.

(1975). The effects of self-instruction on writing deficiencies. Behavior Therapy, 6, 178–87.

23.

Sandler

Watson

Footo

Levine

Coleman

Hooper

(1992). Neurodevelopmental study of writing disorders in middle childhood. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 17–23.

24.

Smyth

Silvers

(1987). Functions of vision in the control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 65, 47–64.

25.

Sovik

(1975). Developmental cybernetics of handwriting and graphic behavior. Oslo: Universitestsforlaget.

26.

Sovik

(1980a). Developmental trends of visual feedback control and learning in children's copying and tracking skills. Journal of Experimental Education, 49, 106–119.

27.

Sovik

(1980b). Dynamic versus static model display related to children's tracing performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 49, 21–28.

28.

Sovik

(1981). An experimental study of individualized learning/instruction in copying, tracking, and handwriting based on feedback principles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 192–215.

29.

Sovik

(1984). The effects of a remedial tracking program on writing performance of dysgraphic children. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 28, 129–147.