Development and Reliability of an Upper Extremity Function Test for the Elderly: The TEMPA

Abstract

French

Accurate assessment of upper extremity performance is a critical element in determinimg the potential independance of the physically impaired person. An upper extremity function test for the elderly, the TEMPA (Test Évaluant les Membres supérieurs des Personnes Âgées), was developed, involving nine tasks related to routine daily activities. Each task is measured by three sub-scores: speed of execution, functional rating and task analysis. A test-retest and interrater reliability study was conducted with a sample of 29 subjects, aged 62 to 82 years, with various upper extremity impairments and varying degrees of functional independance. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from moderate to high (0.70 to 1.0), demonstrating temporal stability and sound agreement between evaluators. A preliminary construct validity study was conducted by correlating score of the TEMPA with functional independance to basic personal care (Spearman's Rho = 0.74). The TEMPA is a reliable instrument that appears to fill a void in the evaluation of the elderly. More psychometric studies are required to confirm its validity.

Keywords

Aged Arm Reliability of tests Tests by title

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aniansson

Grimby

Hedberg

Rungren

Sperling

(1978). Muscle function in old age. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, supp. 6, 43–46.

Benson

Clark

(1982). A guide for instrument development and validation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 789–800.

Bravo

Potvin

(1991). Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's Alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: Toward the integration of two traditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 381–390.

Carroll

(1965). A quantitative test of upper extremity function. Journal of Chronic Disease, 18, 479–491.

Chalmer

B.J.

(1987). Understanding statistics. Monticelli, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Cohen

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

Cohen

(1968). Weighted Kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–220.

Desrosiers

Dutil

Hébert

(1991). Revue et analyse d'instruments de mesure de la main et du membre suptérieur. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 67–76.

Donner

Eliasziw

(1987). Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 441–448.

10.

Fleiss

J.L.

(1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

11.

Hall

J.H.

(1974). Inter-rater reliability of ward rating scales. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 248–255.

12.

Hébert

Carrier

Bilodeau

(1988). The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and Aging, 17, 293–302.

13.

Jacobson-Sollerman

Sperling

(1977). Grip function of the healthy hand in a standardized hand function test. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 9, 123–129.

14.

Jebsen

R.H.

Taylor

Trieshmann

R.B.

Trotter

M.J.

Howard

L.A.

(1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50, 311–319.

15.

Landis

J.R.

Koch

G.G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

16.

Mathiowetz

Kashman

Volland

Weber

Dowe

(1985). Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, 69–74.

17.

Mathiowetz

Weber

Volland

Kashman

(1984). Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. Journal of Hand Surgery, 9A, 222–226.

18.

Smith

H.B.

(1973). Smith hand function evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 27, 244–251.

19.

Williams

M.E.

Hadler

N.M.

Earp

J.L.

(1982). Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. Journal of Chronic Disease, 37 (9/10), 705–711.