Field interviews were conducted with seven clients with disabilities for the purpose of developing design guidelines for apartments suitable for independent living. Analysis of these data generated six factors that were highly valued and felt to contribute to the success of these individuals' venture into community living. Control appears to be the central construct and to subsume the other concepts: safety/security, accessibility/mobility, function, flexibility and privacy. These findings are presented and discussed here as a working model of environmental control. These ideas are suggested as hypotheses which would need to be tested and refined further before being used as a model to guide clinical interventions.
AltmanI. (1975) Environment and social behavior: Privacy, territoriality, personal space and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brookes Cole.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (1981). Official Position Paper: Occupational therapy's role on independent or alternative living situations. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 812–814.
3.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (1983). The roles and functions of occupational therapy services for the severely disabled. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 811–814.
4.
AverillJ. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 286–303.
5.
BowersJ. (1979) Privacy, territoriality, personal space and personality. In SeidelA.DanfordS. (Eds). Environmental design: Research, theory, and application, pp. 51–62. Washington, D.C.: Environment, Design and Research Association.
6.
BrooksN. (1983). Using field research to gain subjective insights. In CreweN.I. Zola & Associates (Eds.). Independent living for physically disabled people, pp. 292–310. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1991). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
CooperB.DieckmannF. (1989). United Cerebral Palsy design guidelines for independent living units for cerebral palsy clients. Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, School of Architecture and Urban Planning.
10.
CreweN., Zola I. & Associates, (Eds.) (1983). Independent living for physically disabled people. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
LangerE.RodinJ. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.
12.
LauferR.WolfeM. (1977). Privacy as a concept and social issue: A multidevelopmental theory. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 22–42.
13.
LauferR.WolfeM. (1978) Childhood and privacy. In AltmanI.WohlwillJ. (Eds.). Children and the environment. New York: Plenum.
14.
LawtonP. (1986). Environment and aging. (2nd Ed.). Albany, NY: The Center for the Study of Aging.
15.
LifchezR.WinslowB. (1979). Design for independent living: The environment and physically disabled people. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
16.
MilesM.HubermanM. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
ReichJ.ZautraA. (1990). Dispositional control beliefs and the consequences of a control-enhancing intervention. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 46–51.
18.
ReizensteinJ.OstranderE. (1981). Design for independence: Housing for the severely disabled. Environment and Behavior, 13, 633–647.
19.
SchumakerS.ReizensteinJ. (1982). Environmental factors affecting inpatient stress in acute care hospitals. In EvansG. (Ed.). Environmental stress, pp. 179–223. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
ShearerA. (1982). Living independently. London: King's Fund Publishing Office.
21.
ShulzR. (1976). Effects of control and predictability on the physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 563–573.
22.
SmithD. (1981). Obstacles: Report of the special committee on the disabled and handicapped. (XC 2-321/5-03E). Ottawa: Minister of Supply arid Services Canada.
23.
SmithD. (1982). Obstacles: Progress report of the special committee on the disabled and the handicapped. (XC2-321/5-05E). Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada,.
ThompsonS. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 89–101.
26.
WeismanG. (1978). Modeling environment-behavior systems: A brief note. Journal of Man-Environment Relations, 1, 32–41.
27.
WindleyP.ScheidtR. (1980). Person-environment dialectics: Implications for competent functioning in old age. In PoonL. (Ed.). Aging in the 1980's: Pathological issues, pp. 407–423. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
