The purpose of this paper is to describe the application of the ethnographic approach to occupational therapy research problems. Disability ethnography is defined and a rationale for its use is provided. A review of disability ethnographies is included to support the usefulness of the technique. A description of methods and one approach to data analysis are described next. The paper concludes with a discussion of the limitations of this research approach.
AgarM. (1986). Speaking of ethnography. Beverely Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
AgarM. (1973). Ethnography and the addict. In NaderL.MaretzkiT. (Eds.) Culture, illness & health (pp. 35–42). Washington, DC: American Anthropology Association Publication.
3.
AmarasinghamL.R. (1984). “This will clear your mind”: The use of metaphors for medication in psychiatric settings. Culture. Medicine and Psychiatry, 8, 49–70.
4.
AndersonJ.M. (1986). Ethnicity and illness experience: Ideological structures and the health care delivery system. Social Science and Medicine, 22, 1277–1283.
5.
BeckerG. (1980). Growing old in silence: Deaf people in old age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
BorgW.R.GallM.D. (1979). Educational research. New York: Longman.
7.
DuffyM.E. (1985). Designing nursing research: The qualitative-quantitative debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 10, 225–232.
8.
DuvalM.L. (1984). Psychosocial metaphors of physical distress among multiple sclerosis patients. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 635–638.
9.
EdgertonR.B. (1967). The cloak of competence: Stigma in the lives of the mentally retarded. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
EstroffS.E. (1981). Making it crazy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
FieldP.A.MorseJ.M. (1985). Nursing research. The application of qualitative approaches. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.
12.
GoldinC.S. (1984). The community of the blind: Social organization, advocacy and cultural redefinition. Human Organization, 43, 121–131.
13.
GubaE.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trust-worthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Resources Information Center Annual Review Paper, 29, 75–91.
14.
GubriumJ.F. (1975). Living and dying at Murray Manor. New York: St. Martin's Press.
15.
GubriumJ.F.BuckholdtD.R. (1982). Describing care. Images and practice in rehabilitation. Cambridge, MA: Oglgeschlager, Gium, & Hain.
16.
HigginsP.C. (1980). Outsiders in a hearing world. A sociology of deafness. Beverely Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
JacobsG. (1970). The participant observer. New York: George Braziller.
18.
KaufertP.L.KaufertJ.M. (1984). Methodological and conceptual issues in measuring the long term impact of disability: The experience of poliomyelitis patients in Manitoba. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 609–618.
19.
KielhofnerG. (1981). An ethnographic study of deinstitutionalized adults: Their community settings and daily life expectations. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1, 125–142.
20.
KleinmanA.EisenbergL.GoodB. (1981). Culture, illness, and care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 88, 251–258.
LeiningerM.M. (1985a). Nature, rationale and importance of qualitative research methods in nursing. In LeiningerM.M. (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing (pp. 1–25). New York: Grune & Stratton.
23.
LeiningerM.M. (1985b). Ethnography and ethnonursing: Models and modes of qualitative data analysis. In LeiningerM.M. (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing (pp. 33–71). New York: Grune & Stratton.
24.
LockerD. (1983). Disability and disadvantage. The consequence of chronic illness. London: Tavistock Publications.
25.
MorseJ.A. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative research: Issues in sampling. In ChinnP. (Ed.) Nursing Research Methodology: issues in Nursing, pp. 181–191.
26.
MyerhoffB. (1978). Number our days. New York: Simon & Schuster.
27.
PaytonO.D. (1979). Research: The validation of clinical practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
28.
ReynoldsD.K.FarberowN.L. (1977). Endangered hope: Experiences in psychiatric aftercare facilities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
RothJ.A.EddyE.M. (1967). Rehabilitation for the unwanted. New York: Atherton Press.
30.
SandelowskiM. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 27–37.
31.
Scheper-HughesN. (1982). Saints, scholars, and schizophrenics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
SchmidH. (1981). Qualitative research and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 105–106.
33.
SeidelJ.V. (1985). The Ethnograph (Computer Program). Littleton, CO: Qualis Research Associates.
34.
SpradleyJ.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
35.
StubbinsJ. (1984). Vocational rehabilitation as social science. Rehabilitation Literature, 45, 375–380.
