Measurement Instruments are used by occupational therapists to describe patients, predict recovery and evaluate immediate treatment effect within their clinical practice. An instrument's development and methodological properties are guided by the purpose of the instrument. In this paper, criteria are proposed for evaluating the utility of measurement tools used by occupational therapists. These criteria are discussed within the framework of the intended use of the instrument. The criteria include the instrument's purpose, clinical utility, construction and scaling, standardization, reliability, validity and responsiveness. An algorithm to guide therapists' appraisal of measurement instruments is included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresA.J. (1972). Southern California Sensory Integration Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
2.
American Psychological Association. (1983). Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
Bayley Scales of Infant Development. (1969). California: The Psychological Corporation.
4.
BloomerJ.S.WilliamsS.K. (1982). Bay Area Functional Performance Evaluation. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
5.
BowkerA. (1983). Standardized tests utilized by therapists in the field of physical disabilities. American Occupational Therapy Association Physical Disabilities Newsletter, 6, 1–3.
6.
BruininksR.H. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Minnesota: American Guidance Service.
7.
ColtonT. (1974). Statistics in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
8.
ErhardtR.P. (1982). Developmental Hand Dysfunction. Laurel, MD: Ramsco Publishing.
9.
EthridgeD.McSweeneyM. (1971). Research in occupational therapy. IV Data collection and analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 90–97.
10.
FriedmanL.M.FurbergC.D.DeMetsD.L. (1984). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. Boston: John Wright, PSG Inc.
11.
GrangerC.V.SherwoodC.C.GreerD.S. (1977). Functional status measures in a comprehensive stroke care program. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 58, 555–561.
12.
GreensteinL., (1980), Teaching research: An introduction to statistical concepts and research terminology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 320–327.
13.
HarloweD.Van DeusenJ. (1984). Construct validation of the St. Mary's CVA evaluation: perceptual measure. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 184–186.
14.
HasselkusB.R.SafritM.J. (1976). Measurement in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30, 429–436.
15.
HemphillB.J. (1982). The Evaluative Process in Psychiatric Occupational Therapy. New Jersey: Slack Publishing.
16.
KirshnerB.GuyattG. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health and disease. Journal of Chronic Disease, 38, 27–36.
17.
KleinR.M.BellB. (1982). Self-care skills: Behavioural measurement with Klein-Bell ADL scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 335–338.
18.
MagillJ.BartonL. (1985). Single-subject research designs in occupational therapy literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 53–58.
19.
MillerL.J. (1982). Miller Assessment for Preschoolers, Littleton, CO: Foundation for Knowledge in Development.
20.
MitchellS.K. (1979). Inter-observer agreement: reliability and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 376–390.
21.
NunnallyJ.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, second edition. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
OttenbacherK.PetersenP. (1985). Quantitative trends in occupational therapy research: implications for practice and education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 240–246.
24.
PaytonO.D. (1979). Research, the Validation of Clinical Practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
25.
PophamW.J. (1981). Modern Educational Measurement. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
26.
SackettD.L.HaynesR.B.TugwellP. (1985). Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science. Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
27.
SmithM.E.GarrawayW.M.SmithD.L.AkhtarA.J. (1982). Therapy impact on functional outcome in a controlled trial of stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 21–24.
28.
StanleyJ.C. (1972). Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
29.
WainerH. (1976). Estimating coefficients in linear models: Don't make no never mind. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 213–217.
30.
WilsonD.J.BakerL.L.GraddockJ.A. (1984). Functional test for the hemiparetic upper extremity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 159–164.
