This paper investigates the need for Occupational Therapy to establish a philosophy of its own. Two of the Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lectures, Reilly's of 1961 and Yerxa's of 1966, are examined as being representative of the philosophies of pragmatism and existentialism, respectively. Their philosophical approaches are compared in terms of their relevance to Occupational Therapy. A base is proposed from which a new philosophy could be generated, and a personal philosophy and opinion is stated from a student's point of view.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DunningR.E.: Philosophy and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 27: 18–23, 1973.
2.
FeiblemanJ.K.: Understanding Philosophy, Horizon Press, New York, 1973: 198–223.
MoseyA.C.: An alternative: The biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Occupational Therapy28: 243–246, 1971.
5.
OwenC.M.: An analysis of the philosophy of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy22: 502–505, 1968.
6.
ReillyM.: Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of 20th century medicine. (Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture of 1961)American Journal of Occupational Therapy16: 1–9, 1962.
7.
YerxaE.J.Authentic occupational therapy. (Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture of 1966)American Journal of Occupational Therapy21: 1–9, 1967.
