The importance of the review of literature, a component of any research study, has been relatively downgraded by occupational therapists because it is time-consuming. In order to encourage novice researchers and illustrate the importance of a comprehensive review of related literature, a review was carried out in the area of auditory feedback and the teaching of the use of myo-electrically controlled prostheses. This illustration of method in research includes initial ideas, assumptions and facts, the researchable question, the literature review and the conclusions drawn from the review which help guide the researcher in his potential study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ.A.GoetzE. T.MarshallP.M.“Response feedback and motor learning”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 92#3, 1972.
2.
AlbertsonL.M.Ed.D.“Retention of a kinesthetic positioning response acquired under supplementary auditory and visual feedback”, Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 34(7A), 1974.
3.
BloomB.S., ed. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I. New York: David McKay Company, Inc., 1969.
4.
BoltonB.Introduction to Rehabilitative Research. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1974.
5.
CarlsooS.EdfeltA.W.“Attempts at muscle control with visual and auditory impulses as auxilliary stimuli”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 4, 1963.
6.
ConineT.A.“Dilemmas of research in occupational therapy”, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 6, 1972.
7.
DunningR.E.“Philosophy and occupational therapy”, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 27, 1973.
8.
EthridgeD.McSweeneyM.Research in Occupational Therapy. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt, 1971.
9.
HathawayE.“Research in occupational therapy”, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 41, 1974.
10.
HumphreyC.E.ThompsonJ.E.Auditory Display I: Comparison of Auditory and Visual Tracking in One Dimension (AB), John Hopkins University: Applied Physics Lab Report, No. TG 146/147, 1952.
11.
HumphreyC.E.ThompsonJ.E.Auditory Display II: Comparison of Auditory and Visual Tracking in One Dimension (C). John Hopkins University: Applied Physics Lab Report, No. TG 194, 1953.
12.
HuntJ.E.“Research and occupational therapy”, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 43, 1976.
13.
KarlinL.MortimerR.G.“Effect of verbal, visual and auditory augmenting cues on learning a complex motor skill”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 65# 1, 1963.
14.
LeibrechtB.C.LloydA.J.PounderS.“Auditory feedback and conditioning of a single motor unit”, Psychophysiology, Vol. 10# 1, 1973.
15.
MagmanI.H.PierceD.S.BurgerR.E.“Proprioceptive influence in volitional control of individual motor units”, NatureVol. 207, 1965.
16.
NobleC.E.NobleC.S.“Pursuit tracking and skill with separate and combined visual and auditory feedback”, Journal of Motor Behavior, Vol. 4(s), 1972.
17.
NormanK.L.“Dynamic processes in stimulus integration theory; the effects of feedback on the averaging of motor movements”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 102 #3, 1974.
18.
ReynoldsB.“Motor performance as a function of reinforcement and spacing of trials” (Abstract), American Psychologist, Vol. 289, 1951.
19.
ReynoldsB.AdamsJ.A.“Motor performance as a function of click reinforcements”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 45 #5, 1953.
20.
ScottR.N. ed. Progress Report No. 8., University of New Brunswick Bio-Engineering Institute, 1969.
21.
ScottR.N. ed. Progress Report No. 14., University of New Brunswick Bio-Engineering Institute, 1976.
22.
SmodeA.F.“Learning and performance in a teaching task under two levels of achievement information feedback”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 56 #4, 1958.
23.
StelmachG.E.“Feedback — a determinant of forgetting in short term motor memory”, Acta Psychologica, Vol. 37 #5, 1973.
