Patient case formulations have become a standard feature in occupational therapy (OT) education. Despite their demonstrated benefits in optimizing student learning, patient case formulations may unintentionally convey oppressive disability discourses.
Purpose.
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate and invite critical reflection on the use of patient case formulations in reinforcing ableist discourses and assumptions in OT education and practice.
Key Issues.
Through the lens of critical disability theory and Crip theory, the author demonstrates how patient case formulations are often reflective of institutionalized ableism that functions to support oppressive disability discourses in the profession, contributing to harmful healthcare practices.
Implications.
The ongoing use of patient case formulations rooted in oppressive disability discourses perpetuates oppressive constructions of disabled people in OT education and practice. A radical shift towards pedagogical materials and practices that support identity-affirming disability discourses would be more aligned with the profession’s expressed values.
DavisJ. A. (2016). The Canadian model of occupational performance and engagement (CMOP-E). In CurtinM.EganM.AdamsJ. (Eds.), Occupational therapy for people experiencing illness, injury or impairment (pp. 148–168). Elsevier.
4.
DiAngeloR. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for White people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
5.
DolmageJ. T. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press.
6.
EisnerE. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. MacMillan College Publishing Company.
7.
GirouxH. A.PennaA. N. (1979). Social education in the classroom: The dynamics of the hidden curriculum. Theory & Research in Social Education, 7(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1979.10506048
8.
GoodleyD.LiddiardK.Runswick-ColeK. (2018). Feeling disability: Theories of affect and critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 33(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1402752
9.
GrenierM. L. (2020). Cultural competency and the reproduction of White supremacy in occupational therapy education. Health Education Journal, 79(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896920902515
KinébanianA.StomphM. (1992). Cross-cultural occupational therapy: A critical reflection. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(8), 751–757. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.8.751
LawM.CooperB. A.StrongS.StewartD.RigbyP.LettsL. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.
15.
McRuerR. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.
16.
MeekoshaH.ShuttleworthR. (2009). What’s so ‘Critical’ about critical disability studies?Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75.
MinichJ. A. (2016). Enabling whom? Critical disabilities studies now. Lateral: Journal of the Cultural Studies Association, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25158/L5.1.9
19.
MurphyM. (2019). Teaching and learning about sexual diversity within medical education: The promises and pitfalls of the informal curriculum. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0336-y
NixonS.YeungE.ShawJ. A.KuperA.GibsonB. E. (2017). Seven-step framework for critical analysis and its application in the field of physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 97(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20160149
22.
NguyenP. (2019). Suspect communities: Anti-muslim racism and the domestic war on terror. University of Minnesota Press.
23.
PhenixA. (2019, August). What is cultural safety and why it matters as you go out into practice—Where everyone should start in relation with indigenous peoples. Presentation given during the Lavigne-Smee Visiting Scholar Award ceremony, Montreal, Québec.
24.
PeloquinS. M. (1988). Moral treatment: Contexts considered. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43(8), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.43.8.537
25.
PriyadharshiniE. (2003). Coming unstuck: thinking otherwise about “studying up”. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 34(4), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2003.34.4.420
26.
RazackS. H. (1995). The perils of talking about culture: Schooling research on South and East Asian students. Race, Gender and Class, 2(3), 67–82. Retrieved fromhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41674709
27.
RebeiroK. L. (2001). Enabling occupation: The importance of an affirming environment. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(2), 80–89.
TownsendE. A.PolatajkoH. J., & Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT). (2007). Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. CAOT Publications ACE.
30.
WendellS. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. Routledge.
