Manual wheelchair (MWC) training is important, but less than 50% of new wheelchair users receive any training. The Wheelchair training Self-efficacy Enhanced for Use (WheelSeeU), a community-based peer-led MWC training program, is feasible and effective for improving wheelchair skills. However, implementing effective programs requires an understanding of stakeholders’ experiences.
Purpose.
Explore older adults’ perceptions about their participation in the WheelSeeU program.
Method.
Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants who completed the WheelSeeU program. Thematic analysis was conducted.
Findings.
Three themes emerged. 1. Getting my life back described participants’ perceived impact of the WheelSeeU program on their lives. 2. I can do it too, implied critical facilitators for success. 3. Social gains, revealed participants’ feelings of social inclusion through participation in the program.
Implications.
Older adults expressed satisfaction and quality of participation with the WheelSeeU program that increased autonomy, improved MWC mobility and self-efficacy, and enhanced social connectedness.
BeaudoinM.BestK.-L.RouthierF. (2018). Systematic review of peer-led rehabilitation interventions for improving mobility and participation outcomes among adults with mobility impairments. Disabil Rehabil (accepted).
4.
BestK.MillerW. C.RouthierF.EngJ. J.GoldsmithC. (2014). Feasibility of the Wheelchair Self-Efficacy Enhanced for Use (WheelSeeU) training program: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d’ergotherapie, 81(5), 308.
5.
BestK. L.Arbour-NicitopoulosK. P.SweetS. N. (2017). Community-based physical activity and wheelchair mobility programs for individuals with spinal cord injury in Canada: Current reflections and future directions. The journal of spinal cord medicine, 40(6), 777–782.
6.
BestK. L.MillerW. C.HustonG.RouthierF.EngJ. J. (2016). Pilot study of a peer-led wheelchair training program to improve self-efficacy using a manual wheelchair: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, 97(1), 37–44.
7.
BestK. L.MillerW. C.RouthierF.EngJ. J. (2018). Feasibility of the trial procedures for a randomized controlled trial of a community-based peer-led wheelchair training program for older adults. Pilot and feasibility studies, 4(1), 18.
8.
BestK. L.RouthierF.MillerW. C. (2015). A description of manual wheelchair skills training: current practices in Canadian rehabilitation centers. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(5), 393–400.
9.
BradshawC.AtkinsonS.DoodyO. (2017). Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 2333393617742282. doi:10.1177/2333393617742282
10.
CarterS. M.LittleM. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative health research, 17(10), 1316–1328.
11.
CorbièreM.LarivièreN. (2014). Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes: dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé. Québec: Presse de l’Université du Québec.
12.
Cronin-DavisJ.ButlerA.MayersC. A. (2009). Occupational therapy and interpretative phenomenological analysis: comparable research companions?The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(8), 332–338.
13.
DivanoglouA.GeorgiouM. (2017). Perceived effectiveness and mechanisms of community peer-based programmes for spinal cord injuries—a systematic review of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord, 55(3), 225.
14.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research, 12(3), 189–198.
15.
KeelerL.KirbyR. L.ParkerK.McLeanK. D.HaydenJ. A. (2018). Effectiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–19.
16.
Martin GinisK. A.EvansM. B.MortensonW. B.NoreauL. (2017). Broadening the conceptualization of participation of persons with physical disabilities: A configurative review and recommendations. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 98(2), 395–402.
17.
Martin GinisK. A.NiggC. R.SmithA. L. (2013). Peer-delivered physical activity interventions: an overlooked opportunity for physical activity promotion. Translational behavioral medicine, 3(4), 434–443.
18.
MillerW. C.BestK. L.EngJ. J.RouthierF. (2019). Influence of peer-led wheelchair training on wheelchair skills and participation in older adults: Clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 100(6), 1023–1031.
19.
SakakibaraB. M.MillerW. C.RouthierF.BackmanC. L.EngJ. J. (2014). Association between self-efficacy and participation in community-dwelling manual wheelchair users aged 50 years or older. Physical therapy, 94(5), 664–674.
20.
SmithE. M.GiesbrechtE. M.MortensonW. B.MillerW. C. (2016). Prevalence of wheelchair and scooter use among community-dwelling Canadians. Physical therapy, 96(8), 1135–1142. doi:10.2522/ptj.20150574
21.
StandalØ. F.JespersenE. (2008). Peers as resources for learning: a situated learning approach to adapted physical activity in rehabilitation. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 25(3), 208–227.
22.
Sullivan-BolyaiS.BovaC.HarperD. (2005). Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: The use of Qualitative Description. Nursing Outlook, 53(3), 127–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005
23.
TuC.-J.LiuL.WangW.DuH.-P.WangY.-M.XuY.-B.LiP. (2017). Effectiveness and safety of wheelchair skills training program in improving the wheelchair skills capacity: a systematic review. Clinical rehabilitation, 31(12), 1573–1582.
24.
Van NesF.AbmaT.JonssonH.DeegD. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation?European journal of ageing, 7(4), 313–316.
