Little research has focused on the application of the Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF) to occupational therapists’ work in community development (CD).
Purpose.
This study sought to describe Canadian occupational therapists’ CD practice processes.
Method.
Using interpretive description, Canadian occupational therapists engaged in CD practice participated in an initial interview and follow-up interview or focus group. Content analysis was used to analyze the data.
Findings.
Eight occupational therapists participated in describing a process that focused on five key elements: (1) getting to know the community, (2) getting the ball rolling/planning together, (3) building (upon) occupational opportunities, (4) revisiting the approach, and (5) striving for sustainability. These elements occurred within a practice context and frames of reference related to CD practice.
Implications.
Participants outlined a process that was less discrete than the CPPF and highlighted the knowledge and skills needed along with the less tangible attitudes/approaches required to engage with communities.
BrachtN. (1999). Health promotion at the community level: New advances (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BravermanB. (2016). Health policy perspectives: Population health and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 7001090010p1–7001090010p6. doi:10.5014/ajot.2016.701002
3.
ColquhounH.LamontagneM.DuncanE.FianderM.ChampagneC.GrimshawJ. (2017). A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31, 299–309. doi:10.1177/0269215516644309
4.
DavisJ.CraikJ.PolatajkoH. J. (2013). Using the Canadian Practice Process Framework for occupational therapy: Amplifying the process. In TownsendE. A.PolatajkoH. J., Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation (2nd ed., pp. 247–272). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
FosseyE.HarveyC.McDermottF.DavidsonL. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717–732.
7.
GerlachA.TeachmanG.Laliberte-RudmanD.AldrichR.HuotS. (2018). Expanding beyond individualism: Engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 35–43, doi:10.1080/11038128.2017.1327616
8.
HammellK. R. W. (2014). Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: An exploration. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81, 39–50. doi:10.1177/0008417413520489
9.
HammellK. R. W. (2016). Empowerment and occupation: A new perspective. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83, 281–287. doi:10.1177/0008417416652910
10.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.
11.
HyettN.KennyA.Dickson-SwiftV. (2018). Re-imagining occupational therapy clients as communities: Presenting the community-centred practice framework. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 1–15. doi:10.1080/11038128.2017.1423374
12.
HyettN.McKinstryC. E.KennyA.Dickson-SwiftV. (2015). Community-centred practice: Occupational therapists improving the health and wellbeing of populations. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63, 5–8. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12222.
13.
LabonteR. (2012). Community, community development, and the forming of authentic partnerships: Some critical reflections. In MinklerM. (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health and welfare (3rd ed., pp. 95–109). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14.
LaucknerH.LeclairL.YamamotoC. (2019). Moving beyond the individual: Occupational therapists multi-layered work with communities. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82, 101–111.
15.
LaucknerH. M.KrupaT. M.PatersonM. L. (2011). Conceptualizing community development: Occupational therapy practice at the intersection of health services and community. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 260–268. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12147
16.
LaucknerH.StadnykR. L. (2014). Examining an occupational perspective in a rural Canadian age-friendly consultation process. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 61, 376–383. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12147
17.
LaverackG. (2005). Helping groups and communities gain power. In LaverackG. (Ed.), Public health: Power, empowerment and professional practice (pp. 57–74). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
LeclairL. L. (2010). Re-examining concepts of occupation and occupation-based models: Occupational therapy and community development. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 15–21. doi:10.2182/cjot.2010.77.1.3
19.
LeclairL. L.AshcroftM. L.CanningT. L.LisowskiM. (2016). Preparing for community development practice: A Delphi study of Canadian occupational therapists. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83, 226–236. doi:10.1177/0008417416631773
20.
LeclairL. L.RipatJ.WenerP.CooperJ.JohnsonL.DavisE.Campbell-RempelM. A. (2013). Advancing the use of theory in occupational therapy: A collaborative process. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80, 181–193. doi:10.1177/0008417413495182
21.
LettsL. (2003). Occupational therapy and participatory research: A partnership worth pursuing. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 77–87. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.1.77
22.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
PolatajkoH. J.CraikJ.DavisJ.TownsendE. A. (2013). Canadian Practice Process Framework. In TownsendE. A.PolatajkoH. J., Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation (2nd ed., p. 233). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
24.
RamugondoE. L.KronenbergK. (2013). Explaining collective occupations from a human relations perspective: Bridging the individual–collective dichotomy. Journal of Occupational Science, 22, 3–16. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.781920
25.
ReitzS. M.ScaffaM. E.MerrymanM. B. (2014). Theoretical frameworks for community-based practice. Occupational therapy in community-based practice settings (2nd ed., pp. 31–50). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
26.
RestallG.RipatJ.SternM. (2003). A framework of strategies for client-centred practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 103–112. doi:10.1177/000841740307000206
27.
RipatJ.RedmondJ.GraboweckyB. (2010). The winter walkability project: Occupational therapists’ role in promoting citizen engagement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 7–14. doi:10.2182/cjot.2010.77.1.2
28.
SanchezV.CarilloC.WallersteinN. (2011). From the ground up: Building a participatory evaluation model. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 5, 45–52. doi:10.1353/cpr.2011.0007
29.
ThorneS. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
ThorneS.KirkhamS. R.MacDonald-EmesJ. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods. Interpretive description: A noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 169–177.
31.
TownsendE. A.CockburnL.LettsL.ThibeaultR.TrenthamB. (2013). Enabling social change. In TownsendE. A. & PolatajkoH. J., Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation (2nd ed., pp. 153–171). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
32.
VermeulenN.BellT.AmodA.CloeteA.JohannesT.WilliamsK. (2015). Students’ fieldwork experiences of using community entry skills within community development. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(2), 51–55.
33.
WilcockA.HockingC. (2015). An occupational perspective of health (3rd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
34.
WynnK.StewartD.LawM.Burke-GaffneyJ.MoningT. (2006). Creating connections: A community capacity-building project with parents and youth with disabilities in transition to adulthood. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 26, 89–103. doi:101080/j006v26n04_0
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
