Handwriting dysfunction contributes to 40% of all school-based referrals to occupational therapy. Empirically based handwriting interventions are needed to remediate the negative effects of handwriting dysfunction on a child’s occupational performance.
Purpose.
This study examined the effectiveness of mental practice (MP) combined with repetitive task practice (RTP) to rehabilitate handwriting in children.
Method.
Twenty typically developing first and second graders with impaired handwriting received RTP twice a week for 4 weeks, then engaged in MP combined with RTP for the same duration. Using the Minnesota Handwriting Assessment (MHA), they were assessed across four time points: baseline (1), after RTP (2), after MP combined with RTP (3), and follow-up (4).
Findings.
Children significantly improved and retained this increase on all variables of MHA (p < .001) after MP combined with RTP. After RTP, the only significant improvement occurred in handwriting form (p < .001).
Implications.
MP may be a potential therapeutic addition to RTP in rehabilitating global handwriting dysfunction.
AlstonJ. (1985). The handwriting of seven to nine year olds. British Journal of Special Education, 12(2), 68–72.
2.
Case-SmithJ. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy intervention on handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 17–25. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.1.17
3.
Case-SmithJ.HollandT.BishopB. (2011). Effectiveness of an integrated handwriting program for first-grade students: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 670–678. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.000984
4.
CookL.FriendM. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–16.
5.
CornhillH.Case-SmithJ. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 732–739.
6.
CrajeC.van ElkM.BeerenM.van SchieH. T.BekkeringH.SteenbergenB. (2010). Compromised motor planning and motor imagery in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1313–1322. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.010
7.
DecetyJ.GrezesJ. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 172–178. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01312 -1
8.
DonicaD. K. (2015). Handwriting Without Tears: General education effectiveness through a consultative approach. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 6906180050p1–6906180050p8. doi:10.5014/ajot.2015.018366
9.
DoussoulinA.RehbeinL. (2011). Motor imagery as a tool for motor skill training in children. Motricidade, 7(3), 37–43.
10.
FederK.MajnemerA.SynnesA. (2000). Handwriting: Current trends in occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 197–204. doi:10.1177/000841740006700313
11.
FederK. P.MajnemerA. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 312–317. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312
12.
FrickA.DaumM. M.WilsonM.WilkeningF. (2009). Effects of action on children’s and adults’ mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 34–51. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.003
13.
GentiliR.PapaxanthisCPozzoT. (2006). Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice. Neuroscience, 137, 761–772. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.013
14.
GrabherrL.JolaC.BerraG.TheilerR.MastF. W. (2015). Motor imagery training improves precision of an upper limb movement in patients with hemiparesis. Neurorehabilitation, 36, 157–166. doi:10.3233/NRE-151203
15.
GrahamS.WeintraubN. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8(1), 7–87.
16.
HoweT. H.RostonK. L.SheuC. F.HinojosaJ. (2013). Assessing handwriting intervention effectiveness in elementary school students: A two-group controlled study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 19–27. doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.005470
17.
HoyM. M.EganM. Y.FederK. P. (2011) A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 13–25. doi:10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.3
18.
JamesK. H. (2012). Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain. Developmental Science, 13, 279–288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00883.x
19.
JeannerodM. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14, S103–S109. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
20.
JongmansM. J.Linthorst-BakkerE.WestenbergY.Smits-EngelsmanB. C. M. (2003). Use of a task-oriented self-instruction method to support children in primary school with poor handwriting quality and speed. Human Movement Science, 22, 549–566. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.009
21.
KarlsdottirR.StefanssonT. (2002). Problems in developing functional handwriting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 623–662. doi:10.2466/pms.2002.94.2.623
22.
KoenigK. P.Buckley-ReenA.GargS. (2012). Efficacy of the Get Ready to Learn yoga program among children with autism spectrum disorders: A pretest-posttest control group design. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 538–546. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.004390
23.
KwekkeboomK. L.MaddoxM. A.WestT. (2000). Measuring imaging ability in children. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 14, 297–303. doi:10.1067/mph.2000.106896
24.
LazloJ. I.BairstowP. J. (1984). Handwriting: Difficulties and possible solutions. School Psychology International, 5, 207–213.
25.
NilsenD. M.GillenG.GellerD.HrehaK.OseiE.SaleemG. T. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions to improve occupational performance of people with motor impairments after stroke: An evidence-based review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 1–9. doi:10.5014/ajot.2015.011965
26.
OlsenJ. Z. (1999). Handwriting Without Tears (5th ed.). Potomac, MD: Author.
27.
OlsenJ. Z.KnaptonE. F. (2008). Handwriting Without Tears first grade teacher’s guide (10th ed.). Cabin John, MD: Handwriting Without Tears.
28.
ReismanJ. (1993). Poor handwriting: Who is referred?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 849–852. doi:10.5014/ajot.45.9.849
RosenblumS. (2008). Development, reliability, and validity of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 298–307. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.3.298
31.
RostonK. L.HinojosaJ.KaplanH. (2008). Using the Minnesota Handwriting Assessment and Handwriting Checklist in screening first and second graders’ handwriting legibility. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 1(2), 100–115. doi:10.1080/19411240802312947
32.
SandlerA. D.WatsonT. E.FootoM.LevineM. D.ColemanW. L.HooperS. R. (1992). Neurodevelopmental study of writing disorders in middle childhood. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13(1), 17–23. doi:10.1097/00004703-199202000-00005
33.
SchmidtR. A.WrisbergC. A. (2000). Motor learning and performance: A problem-based learning approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
34.
Shumway-CookA.WoollacottM. H. (2017). Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice (5th ed.). New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
35.
SteenbergenB.CrajeC.NilsenD. M.GordonA. M. (2009). Motor imagery training in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a potentially useful therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 51, 690–696. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03371.x
36.
TimmermansA. A. A.SpoorenA. I. F.KingmaH.SeelenH. A. M. (2010). Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24, 858–870. doi:10.1177/1545968310368963
37.
TsengM. H.MurrayE. A. (1994). Differences in perceptual motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 19–36.
38.
VolmanM. J. M.van SchendelB. M.JongmansM. J. (2006). Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: A search for underlying mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 451–460. doi:10.5014/ajot.60.4.451
39.
WeintraubN.YinonM.HirschI. B.ParushS. (2009). Effectiveness of sensorimotor and task-oriented handwriting intervention in elementary school-aged students with handwriting difficulties. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 29, 125–134. doi:10.3928/15394492-20090611-05.
40.
WilsonP. H.ThomasP. R.MaruffP. (2002). Motor imagery training ameliorates motor clumsiness in children. Journal of Child Neurology, 17, 491–498.
41.
YaguezL.NagelD.HoffmanH.CanavanA. G. M.WistE.HombergV. (1997). A mental route to motor learning: Improving trajectorial kinematics through imagery training. Behavioral Brain Research, 90(1), 95–106. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00087-9
42.
Zaner-Bloser. (2013). Handwriting research: Impact on the brain and literacy development. Columbus, OH: Author.
43.
ZwickerJ. G.HadwinA. F. (2009). Cognitive versus multisensory approaches to handwriting intervention: A randomized controlled trial. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 29, 40–48. doi:10.3928/15394492-20090101-06
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
