A better understanding of the features characterizing expert evidence-based occupational therapists in stroke rehabilitation is needed to inform the design of educational and knowledge translation interventions aimed at addressing research–practice gaps.
Purpose.
The study aimed to identify the attributes of evidence-based occupational therapy stroke rehabilitation experts from the perspective of their peers.
Method.
Forty-six occupational therapy clinicians and managers completed an online questionnaire asking them to nominate “outstanding” and “expert evidence-based” occupational therapists in stroke rehabilitation and to explain their choices. A thematic analysis of respondents’ statements was conducted.
Findings.
Both outstanding and expert evidence-based occupational therapists were perceived to be motivated self-learners; to have extensive knowledge, skills, and experience; to act as scholarly practitioners; to achieve superior client outcomes; and to work in specialized settings.
Implications.
The development of future strategies supporting occupational therapy students and clinicians to become lifelong learners should take into account key attributes of expertise, such as motivation for continuous learning and professional development.
BayleyM. T.HurdowarA.RichardsC. L.Korner-BitenskyN.Wood-DauphineeS.EngJ. J.…HarrisonM. (2012). Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: Findings from a multi-site pilot project. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 1633–1638. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.656790
2.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186–3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
3.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4.
CamererC.JohnsonE. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can experts know so much and predict so badly? In EricssonA.SmithJ. (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 195–217). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery. (2018). Stroke engine. Retrieved fromhttp://www.strokengine.ca/
7.
ChiM.GlaserR.FarrM. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CraikJ.RappoltS. (2003). Theory of research utilization enhancement: A model for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 266–275. doi:10.1177/000841740307000503
9.
DavidI.PoissantL.RochetteA. (2012). Clinicians’ expectations of web 2.0 as a mechanism for knowledge transfer of stroke best practices. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), e121. doi:10.2196/jmir.2016
10.
DawesR. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520180095045
11.
EpsteinR. M.SiegelD. J.SilbermanJ. (2008). Self-monitoring in clinical practice: A challenge for medical educators. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 5–13. doi:10.1002/chp.149
12.
EricssonK. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(10), S70–S81. doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
13.
EvaK. W.LohfeldL.DhaliwalG.MylopoulosM.CookD. A.NormanG. R. (2011). Modern conceptions of elite medical practice among internal medicine faculty members. Academic Medicine, 86(10), S50–S54. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6cce
14.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). London, UK: Sage.
15.
HebertD.LindsayM. P.McIntyreA.KirtonA.RumneyP. G.BaggS.…GarnhumM. (2016). Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. International Journal of Stroke, 11, 459–484. doi:10.1177/1747493016643553
16.
HoffmanR. R. (1992). The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
17.
KingG.CurrieM.BartlettD. J.GilpinM.WilloughbyC.TuckerM. A.…BaxterD. (2007). The development of expertise in pediatric rehabilitation therapists: Changes in approach, self-knowledge, and use of enabling and customizing strategies. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 10, 223–240. doi:10.1080/17518420701302670
18.
Korner-BitenskyN.Barrett-BernsteinS.BibasG.PoulinV. (2011). National survey of Canadian occupational therapists’ assessment and treatment of cognitive impairment post-stroke. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 241–250. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00943.x
19.
Korner-BitenskyN.DesrosiersJ.RochetteA. (2008). A national survey of occupational therapists’ practices related to participation post-stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 291–297. doi:10.2340/16501977-0167
20.
Korner-BitenskyN.Wood-DauphineeS.TeasellR.DesrosiersJ.MalouinF.ThomasA.…KehayiaE. (2006). Best versus actual practices in stroke rehabilitation: Results of the Canadian National Survey. Stroke, 37(2), 631.
21.
McCluskeyA.AdaL.KellyP. J.MiddletonS.GoodallS.GrimshawJ. M.…KarageorgeA. (2015). Compliance with Australian stroke guideline recommendations for outdoor mobility and transport training by post-inpatient rehabilitation services: An observational cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 15, Article 296. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0952-7
22.
McCluskeyA.HomeS.ThompsonL. (2008). Becoming an evidence-based practitioner. In LawM.MacDermidJ. (Eds.), Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice (2nd ed., pp. 35–60). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
23.
McCluskeyA.MiddletonS. (2010). Increasing delivery of an outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: A feasibility study involving five community rehabilitation teams. Implementation Science, 5, Article 59. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-59
24.
McCluskeyA.Vratsistas-CurtoA.SchurrK. (2013). Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 13, Article 323. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-323
25.
Menon-NairA.Korner-BitenskyN.OgourtsovaT. (2007). Occupational therapists’ identification, assessment, and treatment of unilateral spatial neglect during stroke rehabilitation in Canada. Stroke, 38, 2556–2562. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484857
26.
MylopoulosM.RegehrG. (2011). Putting the expert together again. Medical Education, 45, 920–926. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04032.x
27.
MylopoulosM.WoodsN. N. (2009). Having our cake and eating it too: Seeking the best of both worlds in expertise research. Medical Education, 43, 406–413. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03307.x
NormanG.EvaK.BrooksL.HamstraS. (2006). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.FeltovichP. J.HoffmanR. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 339–354). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
PetzoldA.Korner-BitenskyN.RochetteA.TeasellR.MarshallS.PerrierM.-J. (2010). Driving poststroke: Problem identification, assessment use, and interventions offered by Canadian occupational therapists. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17, 371–379. doi:10.1310/tsr1705-371
32.
SackettD. L.RosenbergW. M.GrayJ. A.HaynesB. R.RichardsonS. W. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
33.
SalbachN. M.GuilcherS. J.JaglalS. B.DavisD. A. (2010). Determinants of research use in clinical decision making among physical therapists providing services post-stroke: A cross-sectional study. Implementation Science, 5, Article77. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-77
34.
SalbachN. M.JaglalS. B. (2011). Creation and validation of the evidence-based practice confidence scale for health care professionals. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 794–800. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01478.x
35.
SalbachN. M.JaglalS. B.Korner-BitenskyN.RappoltS.DavisD. (2007). Practitioner and organizational barriers to evidence-based practice of physical therapists for people with stroke. Physical Therapy, 87, 1284. doi:10.2522/ptj.20070040
36.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334–340. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
37.
SonnentagS. (1998). Identifying high performers: Do peer nominations suffer from a likeability bias?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7, 501–515. doi:10.1080/135943298398547
38.
ThomasA.SaroyanA.DauphineeW. D. (2011). Evidence-based practice: A review of theoretical assumptions and effectiveness of teaching and assessment interventions in health professions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16, 253–276. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9251-6
39.
ThomasA.SaroyanA.LajoieS. P. (2012). Creation of an evidence-based practice reference model in falls prevention: Findings from occupational therapy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 311–328. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.607210
40.
ThomasA.SaroyanA.SniderL. M. (2012). Evidence-based practice behaviours: A comparison amongst occupational therapy students and clinicians. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 96–107. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2012.79.2.5
41.
ThomasA.YoungM. E.MazerB. L.LubarskyS. E.RazackS. I. (2015). Candidates’ and interviewers’ perceptions of multiple-mini interviews for admission to an occupational therapy professional program. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29, 186–200. doi:10.3109/07380577.2015.1012776
42.
TuliF. (2011). The basis of distinction between qualitative and quantitative research in social science: Reflection on ontological, epistemological and methodological perspectives. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 6(1). doi:10.4314/ejesc.v6i1.65384
43.
VachonB.DurandM.-J.LeBlancJ. (2010). Empowering occupational therapists to become evidence-based work rehabilitation practitioners. Work, 37, 119–134. doi:10.3233/WOR-2010-1063
44.
VachonB.RochetteA.ThomasA.Foucar DesormeauxW.HuynhA.-T. (2016). Professional portfolios used by Canadian occupational therapists: How can they be improved? Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 4(3), Article4. doi:10.3233/WOR-2010-1063
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
